Connie Robinson V. Thr & Association Case Summary

429 Words1 Page

Shannon Lee & Connie Robinson v. THR & Association, Inc. 12-vb-3078 (2012). This case comprises the plaintiffs, who file a lawsuit against the defendants for denying them overtime pay, which are an infraction of extra hour’s provisions and exemptions under the Fair Labor Standard Act. These non-exempted employees worked 59.33 hours per week with 19.33 additional hours being overtime hours. Moreover, the plaintiffs unpaid hours combined totaled 9,483 in a permissible retro. The claimant’s claim was asserted and bestowed $12, 207,880.84 plus attorney’s fees of, $119.843.75. Megan Pellino v. Brink’s Incorporated 164 Wn. App. 668; 267 P.3d 383 (2011). This case implicates employees who did not get legitimate meal periods or rest breaks. The laborers were demanded to stay vigilant continually and execute a number of extra errands while on the interstate with no leisure time to rest or eat. This is an infraction of the Labor’s Wage and Hour Division; therefore, the claimant’s claim asserted for “$874,775.70 for overtime pay, $422,536.75 in interest benefits, and $799,155.98” for attorney’s stipends and restitutions (LexisNexis, 2011). …show more content…

J. (2014). Give-me-a-Break or $56.5 Million. Asian Journal. This article implicates that five hourly non-exempt restaurant’s employees who worked ten hours before receiving a meal period and was made to work during their lunch period (Sayas, 2014). Thus, the workers did not get a rest break and demanded to work off the clock without pay (Sayas, 2014). This infraction is in violation of the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division under the minimum paid rest period. Moreover, the employees’ cases were settled out of court for $56.5 million (Sayas,

Open Document