Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The cause of the arab israeli conflict
Israeli - Palestinian conflict
Arab israeli conflict
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The cause of the arab israeli conflict
The Arab-Israeli conflict has lasted for many years and has affected many lives. In such a pivotal and emotionally charged political event, most powerful and influential politicians will take sides. The conflict’s factions do not represent good and bad but rather portray the biased views of two groups locked in everlasting disputes over land. American politicians such as Condoleezza Rice and Bill Clinton are interested in the events occurring over-seas and support the conflict and the factions in a variety of ways.
Condoleezza Rice served as United States Secretary of State under George W. Bush from 2005 to 2009. Condoleezza Rice is a political scientist and diplomat. She was the 66th United States Secretary of State and the second Secretary
…show more content…
Before joining the national government she was a professor of political science at Stanford University from 1993 to 1999. Rice also served on the National Security Council as the Soviet and Eastern Europe Affairs Adviser to George H.W. Bush during the fall of the Soviet Union and the German reunification.
Rice moved to persuade Israel’s withdrawal from Palestinian territories and open commerce and travel between the areas. During the summer of 2005, Condoleezza Rice encouraged Israeli leadership to withdraw from settlements in Gaza and the West Bank. She visited the region in July to show American involvement and support in the conflict. She marked the successful withdrawal as a victory for both Israel and Palestine by stating that "[The withdrawal] is a historic moment for both sides, and the commitment of both sides to a successful disengagement process has been impressive." Despite Gaza’s new Palestinian leadership, complaints of stifled commerce and travel difficulties are still heard. Rice has further encouraged the creation of a Palestinian state by inviting both sides of the
…show more content…
American plans for the conflict has shifted dramatically since the Bush administration and Rice’s diplomatic effects. American focus has shifted from support for Israel to a more mediated or even pro-Palestinian essence. Some more recent acts of the new American administration is the denouncement of Israeli housing projects on the West Bank. The settlements were an overall failed attempt but brought attention from the United States and the United Kingdom with claims from the nations include terms such as “Illegal” and “Illegitimate”. Any peaceful intentions or ideas are buried under the constant threat of missile strikes on Israel, with many missiles crossing their skies daily. Relations will remain strained and the region’s populace will live in perpetual fear and distrust until the actions of radical groups stop. American involvement in the conflict is not likely to slow or cease, especially given the recent ISIS threat and the instability of Palestinian control over their
... the president, would be the secretaries of states, defense (war and navy), and treasury”(Davidson and Lytle, 2010). Sometimes political actors would turn a less influential office into an important command post just like Henry Kissinger did when was Richard Nixon’s security advisor. Kissinger and Nixon had rehsaped teh style and substance of froeign affairs. Kissinger had saw Russia as a rival and had sought out to achieve global balance of power by pursuing areas of cooperation with Moscow. “With Nixon’s approval, Kissinger concentrated foreign policy-making power within foreign affairs bureaucracy and effectively curtailing the authority of Secretary of States William Rodgers”(1996-2009 WGBH Educational Foundation).
...being one of the most powerful women in politics and represented Denver in 1997. People looked up to her as she represented women’s positions in politics, child care programs, and fought to decrease the spending limits that were set for defense installations (Abbott, Leonard, Noel, pp. 480, 2013).
Condoleeza Rice has been a member on the boards of directors for the Charles Schwab Corporation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Chevron Corporation, the University of Notre Dame, the International Advisory Council of J.P. Morgan and the San Francisco Board of Governors. She also has invested time working on various political books, such as “Germany Unified and Europe Transformed,” “The Gorbachev Era,” and “Uncertain Allegiance: The Soviet Union and the Czechoslovak Army.”
Condoleezza Rice once said “Life is full of surprises and serendipity. Being open to unexpected turns in the road is an important part of success. If you try to plan every step, you may miss those wonderful twists and turns. Just find your next adventure-do it well, enjoy it-and then, not now, think about what comes next.” Rice is a perfect example of success and is someone to admire. Whether she is overcoming racism, sexism, or age, she still succeeds in life. Condoleezza is a great image and role model for aspiring and emerging leaders.
The Middle East has since time immemorial been on the global scope because of its explosive disposition. The Arab Israeli conflict has not been an exception as it has stood out to be one of the major endless conflicts not only in the region but also in the world. Its impact continues to be felt all over the world while a satisfying solution still remains intangible. A lot has also been said and written on the conflict, both factual and fallacious with some allegations being obviously evocative. All these allegations offer an array of disparate views on the conflict. This essay presents an overview of some of the major literature on the controversial conflict by offering precise and clear insights into the cause, nature, evolution and future of the Israel Arab conflict.
Israel has been dealing with Palestinian pressures to give back the land that they consider “theirs” and other leaders have had different views on how to handle aggression from the Palestinians. Ehud Olmert’s views included handling the conflict with peace and not using violence. He suggested to Mohamed Abbas a convergence plan which centered around the idea that the Israeli people would be forced out of the West Bank which is an are...
The pro-Israel intervention represented the US foreign policy reaction when the violation to regional stability was committed by Israel. The cases discussed above were evaluated against the US reaction to Israel’s regional behaviour; in terms of whether the Israeli behaviour served or hampered US interest in maintaining regional stability and whether or not the US opposed Israel when it acted in ways that the United States deemed undesirable. It was concluded that, as a general rule, Washington was ready to intervene to address any violation to the status quo in the Middle East system except when this violation was committed by its regional surrogate. Israel had contributed directly in destabilizing the Middle East system (pushing the system out of its equilibrium point) in several cases, four of which have been discussed above. These crises, in spite of their negative effect on regional stability, witnessed minimal US reaction.
The department is head by the Secretary of State which is the official chief foreign policy advisor to the president; although this role at times as been taking on by the national security advisor. There secretary is assisted by a deputy secretary and four under secretaries; with access to ambassadors whom have the ability to negotiate around the world. While the department has many other functions such as Educational and Cultural Affairs and Economic and Business Affairs the main focus of the department is to maintain relationships with other countries around the world. The agenda of the Department can at times conflict with the agenda of the Department of Defense in regards to foreign threat, with the Department of State advocating the power of diplomacy and the Department of Defense encouraging the use of military action. A good example arose during the Cuban Missile Crisis in which the Department of Defense promoted air strikes against Cuba while the Department of State relied on diplomatic channels through the United Nations.
Bourke, Dale Hanson. The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: Tough Questions, Direct Answers. Downers Grove, IL: Inter Varsity, 2013. N. pag. Print.
The Israeli-Palestine conflict is an event that has been well documented throughout the course of Middle-Eastern history. The conflict dates back as far as the nineteenth century where Palestine and Zionist, will later be known as Israel, are two communities each with different ideologies had the same overwhelming desire to acquire land. However, what makes this clash what it is, is the fact that both of these up and coming communities are after the same piece of land. The lengths that both sides went to in order obtain they believed was theirs has shaped the current relationship between the two nations today.
America’s role in the establishing of Israel marked the beginning of resentment among many Arabs and Muslims communities (Evara, Stratmann & Natta 2007). With this political stand, the US was forced to adopt policies that conflicted with major political movements in the region, namely secular pan-Arabism and Islamic fundamentalism. Egypt was on the forefront pushing for the first movement; it described its position on the Middle East and the rest of the world. Both the movements called for unity among the Muslim and Arabic community. Consequently they alienated the western countries, to an extent of advocating for violence. In 1991 the relationship was complicated further when the US led the gulf war against Iraq. However the more recent September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on America soil hig...
Anne-Marie Slaughter is the first woman director of planning policy at the State Department and the president and CEO of the New America Foundation. She has taught at two of the most prestige schools in the country Princeton and Harvard Law. She is also the author and editor of several books, but the most recent one is called “The Idea That Is America: Keeping Faith with Our Values in a Dangerous World which was published in the year 2007. Slaughters essay is about trying to balance home life and work life, and it first appeared in the Atlantic in July/August 2012 issue and was also on the Huffington Post. This essay argues that women in high power jobs and government positions can have both a work life and also keep their home life. She started her essay with a little information on background about her job.
Since the inception of an Israeli nation-state in 1948, violence and conflict has played a major role in Israel’s brief history. In the Sixty-One year’s Israel has been a recognized nation-state, they have fought in 6 interstate wars, 2 civil wars, and over 144 dyadic militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) with some display of military force against other states (Maoz 5). Israel has been involved in constant conflict throughout the past half century. Israel’s tension against other states within the Middle East has spurred vast economic, social, and political unity that has fostered a sense of nationalism and unity in Israel not seen in most other states. Over the next several pages I will try and dissect the reasons for why the nation state of Israel has been emerged in constant conflict and how this conflict has helped foster national unity and identity among the people of Israel.
Andersen, Roy, Robert F. Seibert, and Jon G. Wagner. Politics and change in the Middle East: sources of conflict and accommodation. 9th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1982. Print.
Bob Hawke once said; “Unless and until something concrete is done about addressing the Israeli-Palestinian issue you won't get a real start on the war against terrorism.” Perhaps Hawke put into a few simple words one of the most complicated issues within our world today, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. As Israel continues to strip the Palestinians of their land and fears it’s very existence because of the Palestinians terrorist acts, there seems to be no solution in sight. The world appears to be split and all over the place when it comes to this matter. According to The Middle East Institute for Understanding approximately 129 countries recognize Palestine as a state while many others do not. Over all the political matters within this issue not only affect Palestine and Israel but the world as a whole, as the Middle East and the West seem to disagree. This has had and will continue to have an enormous impact on many political affairs all over the world particularly in the current fight against terrorism. Personally I feel that the Israeli Palestinian conflict while being a very complicated matter has a simple solution. Within this issue I am a firm believer that the occupation of the West Bank by Israeli forces is extremely unjust and must come to an end. Once this is achieved a two state solution will be the most effective way to bring peace to the area. The occupation of the West Bank violates political and legal rights, human rights, and illegally forces Palestinians who have lived in the area for hundreds of years from their land. This conflict is at the height of its importance and a solution is of dire need as nuclear issues arise in the Middle East due to the tension between Israel and it’s surrounding neighbors, and the...