Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parenting styles for infancy and childhood
Effects of different parenting styles
Effects of different parenting styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Parenting styles for infancy and childhood
Social dynamics are those in which is the study of how one is able to react within and outside one’s self as well as having the ability to react and deal with all the changes that come about. Social dynamics is a huge part of society itself, for we are those that create society itself. The two articles I have chosen to compare and contrast are titled, Unmarried With Children by Kathryn Edin and Invisible Inequality by Maria Kefalas. Both of these articles depict how social class standing of a family impacts child-rearing practices. Social class standing has for centuries impacted child-rearing practices. In the articles, Unmarried With Children and Invisible Inequality, it is evident early on that because of the social factors that are at hand, those are the primary reasons that children are being engaged in child –rearing practices. These social factors include anywhere from economics, family structure, cultural views and most evident in both articles, the way in which parenting styles affects child-rearing practices.
In the article, Unmarried With Children, the main person that is discussed is a young lady by the name of Jen, who had a child at a young age and was not married. Jen like others that grow up in poverty, it is usually hard for them since it is hard for them to access resources that aren’t even readily available to them. For example, Edin and Kefalas states at the end “until poor young women have more access to jobs that lead to financial independence-until there is reason to hope for the rewarding life pathways that their privileged peers pursue-the poor will continue to have children sooner than most Americans think they should” (Edin, Read, pg. 605). Economically, if one is living day by day, it is an unstable en...
... middle of paper ...
... parent says and ask no questions. Another type of parenting style is where the parent allows for the child to question and allows the child to give their input for decisions.
Child-rearing is an important part of a child’s life as it should guide children in the right and productive direction. In the sense that because many of the characters discussed in the readings were poor and working class, much was concluded that if they were not poor, they would not be at as high of a risk for so many potential failures. This is heartbreaking in the sense that if one is poor, there is not much that one can do other than to persevere past it all. I for one know how that life is, living poor, but with motivation and determination, nothing should get in the way of prevailing. These two articles showed hope for the individuals, which is something that I haven’t come across.
...areness of unjustifiable conditions that are imposed on societies youngest and most powerless members. Intermingled with his convictions of the necessity for equality and justice are portraits of children who display a most astounding amount of hope and courage. It is an essential read for all who have plans to enter the field of education. Those of us who aspire to shape the minds of the future need to be aware that all children possess the ability to love and prosper despite whatever environment they have emerged from. It is our duty to provide all children, without regard to race or economic status, with the tools and opportunities they require in order to flourish and lead the satisfying lives that they so greatly desire and deserve.
There is much debate on what constitutes as a family today. However, Ball (2002) states, “The concept of the traditional family…is not an immutable one. It is a social construct that varies from culture to culture and, over time, the definition changes within a culture” (pp. 68). There is a growing diversity of families today including the commonality of sole-parenting. In order to explore aspects of sole-parenthood objectively, I need to reflect and put aside my personal experience of growing up in sole-parent household. Furthermore, this essay will explore the historical origins, cultural aspects discussing the influences and implications of gender identity, and social structures of sole-parent families, as well as consider the implications in midwifery by applying the sociological imagination. Mills (2000/1959) describes the sociological imagination as “…a quality of mind that seems most dramatically to promise an understanding of the intimate realities of ourselves in connection with larger social realities” (pp.15). In other words, the sociological imagination involves the ability to consider the relationships between personal experiences and those within society as a whole.
Annette Lareau opens her book with two chapters to give the reader an idea of what the examples she gives will detail. One of the chapters introduces the different parenting styles she researches, while the other breaks down the social structure and daily life. She then separates the book into three parts: the organization of daily life, language use, and families and institutions. For such families, “sustaining children’s natural growth is viewed as an accomplishment” (Lareau 34).
Today 's generation have changed many ways since the beginning of the century. In “The American Family”, Stephanie Coontz discusses many situations that has occurred during the beginning of the 21st century and suggested solutions to solve those issues in the future. For instance, she argued that women are being treated unfairly, family are not discussing their problems openly, and institutions need to change to fit the families’ requirement. In “Complexity of Family Life among the Low-Income and Working Poor” Patricia Hyjer Dyk, argued that women still doesn’t have enough choices, low income families doesn’t have enough jobs, and Government are not helping many families. Dyk’s review of the scholarly research on low-income families support Coontz’ evaluations of the problems faced by 21st century families and the solutions Coontz recommends, like improving women 's lifestyle, discussing problems openly, improving institutions and changing institutions so it can to fit to fulfil families need. .
I believe it is very difficult to raise a child alone as well as pay for a home. Also, like Edin and Kefalas explained, children raised by 2 parents have a much greater chance of entering college and not going to jail. However, I do agree with some perspectives of the poor women. The idea of having autonomy over one 's life, or working very hard to raise a child as a source of fulfillment can both inspire the mother and even inspire others to do so. Ultimately, I believe that this decision would make sense for me. I think it is possible to raise a child successfully out of wedlock despite it being difficult. It also very interesting, these experiences gave the mother 's important life lessons. As Edin and Kefalas describe: “Women openly, and often eagerly, shared life lessons they had learned about relationships, marriage, and children.” (16.3) What is most interesting to me is the life lessons they learned through raising a child out of wedlock. I think that this is one of the most important parts of the experience because these life lessons can be shared with other individuals. In essence, when a poor women raises a child out of wedlock, it is not only for the success of herself, but it can be for the success of society as the life lessons the mother learns can be
there is also an increase in friends placed in the voluntary kin category. The article states that people who are single or live alone think of themselves as a family. Yet studies shown that these single families tend to keep more in touch with the relatives. A statement that Dr. Coontz makes is that We’re seeing a class divide not only between the haves and the have-nots, but between the I do’s and the I do nots,”. The article also states that the way demographer noticed differences in today’s family from previous one was through the birth rates, today’s rate is about half of what it used to be in 1960. After the era of the baby boom in 1964, the rate was 36 percent, and last year the number dropped to 23.5 percent predicting a 21 percent of child births by 2050. This because less women are become mothers – yet those who are only have one or two children compared the 3 children per family in the 1970s. Another reason the articles bring up about child care is the expenses, a child can easily cost a family as little as 241,080 to about a million dollars. However, the article agrees with chapter when it states that women with a bachelor or higher wait longer to get married and have children (about 90 percent)
The purpose of this study, as well as the central argument, is very well addressed by Lareau in the text and leads to many well supported conclusions. Lareau’s main argument in the text is that when children grow up in certain environments, parents are more likely to use specific methods of child rearing that may be different from other families in different social classes. In the text, Lareau describes how she went into the home of the McAllisters and the Williams, two black families leading completely different lives. Ms. McAllister lives in a low-income apartment complex where she takes care of her two children as well as other nieces and nephews. Ms. McAllister never married the father of her two children and she relies on public assistance for income.
Family structure and stability have constantly evolved and been researched in aspects of sociology. Following World War II, the family ideology in the 1950’s was brought to the attention of Talcott Parsons and Robert Bales (1955) whom demonstrated how transitioning from an agricultural society to that of an industrialization one played an important role in altering family life and structure. Parsons and Bales further expressed how gender role specialization was vital in the continuous of family solidarity. The “instrumental” male father role as the leader of the family responsible for providing the income and support as the “expressive” role which is that of the female mother delivers her contribution to the family through house work and nurture
...ildren, and then stay home and raise the children. Though this path is intended to be a positive pressure from society, it can lead to a hard life for the woman and the children. Sometimes these women become depressed or angry, and this gives the opportunity to cause an unsafe household to develop for the kids, and the woman that is raising them.The social pressure is intended to make a happy and healthy home life for the family, but can ultimately destroy the family and it’s dynamic.
A parent’s parenting styles are as diverse as the world we live in today. Nowadays, parents only want what is best for their children and their parenting styles plays a crucial role in the development of children which will in the long run, not only effect the child’s childhood years, but later prolong into their adult life as well.
Often young women have these problems even though they have good values. The problem is they are not well informed.Parents don’t talk about this because “the girl is too young to learn about this themes”. This is a really sad mentality because unfortunately young girls are more in danger of a sexual abuse or have unprotected sex because they don’t realize the consequences of this action. So now we have to think. For example, If a poor person can’t support his or her family of 4 people. what would do the family if one of the girls has a baby?. The operation that the mother needs for giving birth and the medical assistance is too expensive. According to the author ,“many people received public assistance at some point, Those who worked usually in low-wage jobs made less than $10,000 in the years prior to the birth of the first child’’ . By focusing on what the author said we can assume that with some income you can support a little the birth of a child because the government is also helping you with medical assistance .But poor families that don’t work , and don’t qualify for this
While divorce can either bring or relieve emotional burdens, the biggest burden generally revolves around finances. It is not a new phenomenon that poverty has deep, damaging effects on children. In Jonathan Swift’s 1729 essay, “A Modest Proposal”, it is clear that a single parent’s life has not changed when it comes to bearing the weight of poverty. He even goes on to suggest the idea of eating children, rather than putting them through the pain of poverty. Nevertheless, our communities urge the importance of a strong idealistic family rather than attempting a stronger attack on improving the lives of poor single parents. While I was fortunate enough to be raised in a household with an upper middle class income, I have seen first-hand what it is like for the lower class to survive. The families of most of my close friends in high school struggled to find money for even the most basic essentials of everyday life. Personal transportation was never an option and some couldn’t even afford to eat a school lunch. What I have noticed is students in that situation feel partially responsible for the lack of finances in their families. Because of this sense of responsibility, the child will focus less on school and more on providing for their families. It’s difficult for millions of Americans to grasp on to the fact that there are children in America who go to bed hungry. Far too often the blame is placed on the single parents who are trying to raise them. Maybe, instead of shaming them for getting a divorce, we try helping them and their fight to successfully raise healthy
The style of parenting with which children are raised can profoundly affect their social development, as well as their abilities to deal with life situations as adults. Parents who follow the permissive style of parenting have very few rules, no consistent limits, and more often than not give in to their children.. In a permissive family, the children are in charge.
It limits children’s opportunities and confines their cognitive and modern society’s development. This is why it is important that during early childhood parents understand that this is a critical developmental time, in which they need to establish financial stability, a house on top of the child’s head, and food on the table. Reducing child poverty has been a policy that needs attention from parents, educators, and media. However, the need for reduction of persistent poverty in homes with children has been dismissed and only urgent to social service professionals and adults who grew up through poverty. It is relevant that parents, single or married, are aware of what contributes to families’ poverty before they consider starting a family. Persistent poverty, during childhood, is a hidden social issue that parents and societies must start to engage in. Without conversations, defects of poor children will continue to be a problem within social services professionals and not our
There are four main types of parenting style. This includes (1) authoritative, (2) authoritarian, (3) indulgent, and (4) neglectful parenting. Authoritative parenting is a type of parenting style which is both demanding and responsive. It is often referred to as assertive democratic primarily because the parents encourage their child to be independent, but at the same time, they tend to place limits as well a...