Comparison Of Home And La Puerta

647 Words2 Pages

The meaningful proverb “Home is where the heart is” reflects on how home is not simply defined as a location on a map, but a place where cherished memories and a loving family live. Between Home by Gwendolyn Brooks and La Puerta by José Antonio Burciaga, the concept of home is fluid, shifting constantly between ideas of a strong and magnetizing pull towards home and sometimes quite the opposite, as something that could be given up if necessary. These two stories’ defining themes are shaped by a similar sense of both sweet and sour nostalgia and a sense of family, and yet the authors differ in how their tone and characters react to the possibility of losing everything. Both stories’ homes have a powerful ability to create an environment which envelops the characters in a combination of many emotions that illustrates a general theme. These bittersweet feelings create a unique atmosphere that reinforces the idea that a home is special. The homes in both La Puerta and Home tether the characters through a linking of family ties. They use family in order to show how a home is not a home without the people in it. In Home, this is shown quite clearly when Maud Martha cries “He loves this …show more content…

In Home, Brooks wrote that “she felt that the little line of white, sometimes ridged with smoked purple, and all that cream-shot saffron would never drift across any western sky except that in back of this house. The rain would drum with as sweet a dullness nowhere but here.” This passage perfectly encompasses how memories can so powerfully affect the idea of home. La Puerta includes this idea as well, as Sinesio’s dread at leaving is explained: “[His] heart sank as if he was being pushed out or had already left his home… Already he missed his three children, Celso, Jenaro, and Natasia his eldest, a joy every time he saw her. ‘An absence in the heart is an empty pain,’ he thought.” These stories share a great heartache for the

Open Document