Comparison Of Genocides: The Holocaust Vs. The Rape Of Nanking

1208 Words3 Pages

Can Genocides be worse than Genocides?: The Holocaust vs. The Rape of Nanking
Imagine every friend, every neighbor, every single person in one city being raped, killed, tortured. In the genocide known as the Rape of Nanking, the city of Nanjing was brutally taken captive by the Japanese. On the other hand, all of Germany attacked the Jews. But both of the genocides involved killing, raping, and dehumanizing. The Holocaust exterminated a whole lot more people than the Rape of Nanking. Germany also paid for their crimes, while Japan hardly acknowledged it. Both genocides also happened during the same time period, too. The Rape of Nanking was a smaller genocide than the Holocaust, but they still have their similarities and differences.
Although …show more content…

The Jews had laws manipulated to remove and strip them of their rights. These laws were the Nuremberg laws. Next, their homes were taken from them as they were moved to concentration camps and the ghettos. The concentration camp exposed these people to severe fatigue and infection. After these two steps came the death camps. The death camps were in charge of exterminating any survivors that made it to their camp. In the Rape of Nanking, once the Chinese soldiers failed to defend the city of Nanjing, so the Japanese soldiers proceeded to go door to door killing, raping, and torturing the civilians of Nanjing. Their rights were thrown straight out of the window as they were taken captive. The difference is clearly seen as the Jewish rights were slowly stripped and the civilians of Nanjing lost them in a matter of seconds. If someone was caught, it is survival of the fittest, against weapons, blades, and any other couldn’t move away. Then they were forced out of their homes, to march to the train of convoy taking them to the concentration camp. There the gas vans, gas chambers, and the SS would murder them. In the Rape of Nanking, the civilians were taken from homes, killed, raped, kidnapped, tortured, anything the Japanese wanted to do to …show more content…

The Jews had laws manipulated to remove and strip them of their rights. These laws were the Nuremberg laws. Next, their homes were taken from them as they were moved to concentration camps and the ghettos. The their homes were taken from them as they were moved to concentration camps and the ghettos. The death camps were in charge of exterminating any survivors that made it to their camp. In the Rape of Nanking, once the Chinese soldiers failed to defend the city of Nanjing, so the Japanese soldiers proceeded to go door to door killing, raping, and torturing the civilians of Nanjing. Their rights were thrown straight out of the window as they were taken captive. The difference is clearly seen as the Jewish rights were slowly stripped and the civilians of Nanjing lost them in a matter of seconds. If someone was caught, it is survival of the fittest, against weapons, blades, and any other ive the same blame as Germany did also. Both genocides happened at the same time. The importance of researching these genocides is one so people do not make the same mistake as before. If that would happen humans are not progressing as a whole. Insane is what that it. Second, it is important to know the capabilities and what nations like and do not like. People and nations need to know what other nations are

Open Document