Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Holocaust essay 4 grade
Holocaust essay 4 grade
Holocaust essay 4 grade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Can Genocides be worse than Genocides?: The Holocaust vs. The Rape of Nanking
Imagine every friend, every neighbor, every single person in one city being raped, killed, tortured. In the genocide known as the Rape of Nanking, the city of Nanjing was brutally taken captive by the Japanese. On the other hand, all of Germany attacked the Jews. But both of the genocides involved killing, raping, and dehumanizing. The Holocaust exterminated a whole lot more people than the Rape of Nanking. Germany also paid for their crimes, while Japan hardly acknowledged it. Both genocides also happened during the same time period, too. The Rape of Nanking was a smaller genocide than the Holocaust, but they still have their similarities and differences.
Although
…show more content…
they happened over 1000 miles away and took place at somewhat the same time, the Holocaust and the Rape of Nanking were both results in power hungry dictators seeking to control a weaker population. The Holocaust happened because of the hatred of Jews. Hitler hated their race and religion and blamed them for unfortunate events. So he decided he wanted to get rid of them altogether. Japan was angry about a very narrow end to the Chinese in the battle of Shanghai. So when Japan attacked Nanjing, they took revenge on them. The Soldiers dehumanized them and killed them. But Japan targeted everyone in Nanjing. In the Holocaust, not only Jewish people were targeted. Dissenters and the mentally handicapped also were being erased. The Holocaust started on January 30, 1933 and ended on May 8, 1945. The Rape of Nanking started December 7, 1937 and ended in February of 1938. So the two genocides happened at the same time at one point. The Holocaust occurred in Germany, Poland, and Austria, while the Rape of Nanking took place in only Nanjing, China. The methods and time are similar, but they had different locations. Both the Jewish and the civilians of Nanjing suffered horrific fates at the hands of their brutal, sadistic killers, the Nazis and the Japanese soldiers. In the Holocaust, the Jews were the main targets. Secondary targets were the mentally and physically handicapped, lastly the dissenters. In the Rape of Nanking, the targets were pretty predictable however. The victims were any civilian in Nanjing. The Chinese civilians and the Jews never stood a chance. In the Holocaust, the ones doing this awful deed to the Jews were the Nazis, the SS (Super Soldiers), and Gestapo. They were also the ones to round up the Jewish and send them off to the camps. In The Rape of Nanking, the Japanese soldiers just attacked anyone they could. The Japanese soldiers were taking revenge. Hitler hid his killings, while Japan just flat out raided Nanjing. Both of the perpetrators had no mercy towards the victims. The Jewish and the civilians of Nanjing both had to face the devastation of not only losing their rights and homes, but their life as well, although the modes and methods were different.
The Jews had laws manipulated to remove and strip them of their rights. These laws were the Nuremberg laws. Next, their homes were taken from them as they were moved to concentration camps and the ghettos. The concentration camp exposed these people to severe fatigue and infection. After these two steps came the death camps. The death camps were in charge of exterminating any survivors that made it to their camp. In the Rape of Nanking, once the Chinese soldiers failed to defend the city of Nanjing, so the Japanese soldiers proceeded to go door to door killing, raping, and torturing the civilians of Nanjing. Their rights were thrown straight out of the window as they were taken captive. The difference is clearly seen as the Jewish rights were slowly stripped and the civilians of Nanjing lost them in a matter of seconds. If someone was caught, it is survival of the fittest, against weapons, blades, and any other couldn’t move away. Then they were forced out of their homes, to march to the train of convoy taking them to the concentration camp. There the gas vans, gas chambers, and the SS would murder them. In the Rape of Nanking, the civilians were taken from homes, killed, raped, kidnapped, tortured, anything the Japanese wanted to do to …show more content…
them. The Rape of Nanking and The Holocaust are not on the same scale, but they both should be treated as the same threat. The Japanese has failed to fully recognize their actions and apologize to the families and people affected. They did not receGermany, Poland, and Austria, while the Rape of Nanking took place in only Nanjing, China. The methods and time are similar, but they had different locations. Both the Jewish and the civilians of Nanjing suffered horrific fates at the hands of their brutal, sadistic killers, the Nazis and the Japanese soldiers. In the Holocaust, the Jews were the main targets. Secondary targets were the mentally and physically handicapped, lastly the dissenters. In the Rape of Nanking, the targets were pretty predictable however. The victims were any civilian in Nanjing. The Chinese civilians and the Jews never stood a chance. In the Holocaust, the ones doing this awful deed to the Jews were the Nazis, the SS (Super Soldiers), and Gestapo. They were also the ones to round up the Jewish and send them off to the camps. In The Rape of Nanking, the Japanese soldiers just attacked anyone they could. The Japanese soldiers were taking revenge. Hitler hid his killings, while Japan just flat out raided Nanjing. Both of the perpetrators had no mercy towards the victims. The Jewish and the civilians of Nanjing both had to face the devastation of not only losing their rights and homes, but their life as well, although the modes and methods were different.
The Jews had laws manipulated to remove and strip them of their rights. These laws were the Nuremberg laws. Next, their homes were taken from them as they were moved to concentration camps and the ghettos. The their homes were taken from them as they were moved to concentration camps and the ghettos. The death camps were in charge of exterminating any survivors that made it to their camp. In the Rape of Nanking, once the Chinese soldiers failed to defend the city of Nanjing, so the Japanese soldiers proceeded to go door to door killing, raping, and torturing the civilians of Nanjing. Their rights were thrown straight out of the window as they were taken captive. The difference is clearly seen as the Jewish rights were slowly stripped and the civilians of Nanjing lost them in a matter of seconds. If someone was caught, it is survival of the fittest, against weapons, blades, and any other ive the same blame as Germany did also. Both genocides happened at the same time. The importance of researching these genocides is one so people do not make the same mistake as before. If that would happen humans are not progressing as a whole. Insane is what that it. Second, it is important to know the capabilities and what nations like and do not like. People and nations need to know what other nations are
capable of and how they will respond.
The Jews were taken from their homes and lost many of their possessions too. In both instances, these people lost many things but the worst part was they were stripped of their rights, although they were stripped of different rights the Jews lost the freedom of speech and religion. While the Japanese lost the right of freedom, to choose where to live. The Japanese not only had a rough life in the camps, but also had a long, rough road ahead of them to come out in the real world. “The truth was, at this point Papa did not know which way to turn.In the government’s eyes a free man now,he sat, like those black slaves you hear about who,when they got their freedom at the end of the Civil War, just did not know where else to go or what else to do and ended up back on the plantation, rooted their out of habit or lethargy or fear”(Houston
Genocide...genocide happens quite often in the atrocious despicable place called earth; Like in the Holocaust, and in the trail of tears. The Holocaust was a racist act exploiting the Jews. The trail of tears was over the white man wanting more land, not caring about how this effects anyone else. Both events are based on racist bigotry. They are different but they're the same concept….
Millions upon millions of people were killed in the holocaust, that is just one of many genocides. There are many similarities between different genocides. Throughout history, many aggressors have started and attempted genocides and violence on the basis of someone being the "other".
The Holocaust and Armenian genocide are similar in the reasons that started them, but they are different in who was involved and how the two genocides were executed. Even though there are differences the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust are very similar in the ways people were convinced to follow the government. Both of these genocides started with a change in government. The “Young Turks” who wanted one religion and one language told people that the Armenians were a threat to their national security and called all of them spies (Beecroft). They started with the intellectuals and the leaders.
The Holocaust and the Bosnian genocide had many similarities and differences in their course of events. Unfortunately, genocides like the Jewish Holocaust and the Bosnian genocide still continue to happen today. Jews were constantly persecuted before the Holocaust because they were deemed racially inferior. During the 1930’s, the Nazis sent thousands of Jews to concentration camps. Hitler wanted to wipe out all the European Jews in a plan called The “Final Solution to the Jewish Problem” (World History).
Of course these two horrible tragedies aren't entirely the same but in some similarities they do compare such as, how horrendous the SS guards treated the Jewish men and woman. They murdered innocent families and the ones who surrendered would be held captive in what they called Concentration Camps. Many Jewish families tried hiding and escaping during this time and some in the end were able to get to a safe area like Yang and her family. In the movie Schindlers List, it explains how many Jewish families hid their personal belongings such as necklaces, bracelets, rings by swallowing them or hiding them in food so the guards could not find them. Before the Holocaust began, some areas in Europe removed Jewish children from the school, until 1938 when they were all banned from attending German schools. Discrimination and isolation within education for children began to take place. After reading some information about the holocaust, I came across a website about why the holocaust ever started. It states that "the holocaust started because of ingrained antisemitism both in Germany and the countries it conquered, compounded by propaganda and the resources of a
In Rwanda, if the Hutsus saw a tutsis walking down the street, you would be killed immediately. For this genocide, the Hutsus didn’t hold the Tutsis in a camp, make them sleep in horrid conditions, burn them alive, make them work or even put them in gas chambers leading to death. However, the Holocaust was different, if you were a Jew you would be treated this way. Hitler would take the Jews into a concentration camp to be worked, starved, and tortured until they become weak and ill, proceeding to death. In conclusion, there are several differences between these two genocides.
Over 12 million people alone were killed in the holocaust alone. Internment camps and concentration camps were designed to oppress one group of people by the government. Both of these tragic events happened during ww2. our goal was to suppress one race theirs was to destroy theirs. The concentration and internment camps were essentially the same thing because, they put a economic burden on them, then they were forced to do unreasonable task, and finally they were both suppressed by the government.
The term genocide brings awful things to mind. For most, it probably directs their attention towards the Holocaust; this was definitely a gruesome and obvious example of genocide, but there are many others with great similarities that are not very well known. One of these is the decimation of the Native American population by the European settlers and the atrocious things that were done to them such as the trail of tears following the Indian Removal Act of 1830 during the settling of North America. The Holocaust might be the most well known but there have been many other incidents in history just as abhorrent. The Holocaust and Native American Genocide are different in weapons used and the motives for killing but similar in intent, effects and selection of the persecuted.
But no two events can be identical, just like people every event is unique in its own way. It may be in the way that the event play out its cource, or perhaps it may be in the way that the event is remembered. While we rememeber the holocaust more often than the bombing of pearl harbor we hold both events in different light. As stated in the Article Was the Holocaust unique? The uniqueness of the Holocaust does not lie in numbers. It does not lie in the method of mass murder. What makes it unique is the existence of two elements: planned total annihilation of a national or ethnic group, and the quasi-religious, apocalyptic ideology that motivated the murder (152). Pearl harbor could be said to be an act of revenge against the Japanese, or pure and simple distrust after the bombing, but as Margalit states in his article, it doesn’t compare to the Nazi isolating out the humiliation and death of a certain race, they wanted to destroy them
The first reason the Holocaust should be considered an example of genocide is based on the UN’s definition of genocide. In the treaty by the UN titled “ Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide”, they explain the punishment of genocide, stating that genocide is illegal. According to the UN, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such. That is where the Nazis put them in distinct categories to separate them from the rest of the world. As if they were not like the rest of humanity.
The atomic bombings of Japanese cities and the genocides of the Holocaust are horrific events in human history. Although these events have their differences, they influence the world greatly today because they differ from each other to provide comparisons for history, have significance because of the survivors who tell their personal story, and achieve significance morally as well as immorally.
The holocaust was a horrible time in Germany where millions of people were killed simply for not being Aryan. The group responsible for this was called the Nazis led by a man of the name Adolf Hitler. Hitler’s main target was the Jews, in fact the Nazis were responsible for the killing of 6 million Jews, which is known as one of the largest genocides ever. The way this was done was by taking the Jews to places called concentration camps where they would be kept, tortured and eventually killed by being put into gas chambers. The conditions of these camps were horrible. People had to sleep on top of each other and minimal food was supplied. The results of this was that people died by just being there because they caught a disease. Not only were the conditions bad but people were tortured, beaten and starved. The Nazis put a whole new meaning to the word cruelty. One of the cruelest things the Nazis did was use the Jews for experiments, where people were basically test dummies for Dr. Mengele, who was the head Nazi doctor and referred to as the “angel of death.”
To begin with the holocaust had a great impact in history even though it was a time of disaster, murder, and discrimination. It was a time in which Adolf Hitler,German politician and Nazi party leader, wanted all Jews suffering or dead. Adolf Hitler turned everyone against the Jews because he believed that they were to wealthy and too powerful so he wanted to eliminate all of them. The Jews went through a lot of suffering and pain. The German soldiers which took commands from their leader, Adolf Hitler, put some Jews to work and killed others. Many Jews didn't get to work they were killed instantly. All women were separated from the man and woman were mostly killed instantly only some got the opportunity to work. The some ways that the jews were killed is that they were put into gas chambers by tons or shot by soldiers. Jews were also dying by starvation dehydration soldiers would not give them enough food or water. They would only want those with blue eyes and blonde hair they discriminated all the others. Soldiers would not only kill the Jews but torture them for anything they did. The Jews would be transported from camp to camp walking even in the worst weather conditions which also many died from it.
Firstly, they both fall under the correct definition of a genocide. Both occurred on a massive scale, destroying entire generations of people, leaving a horrible legacy. Racism was a common motivator in both cases. The Anti-Semitic views and policies of Nazi Germany are paralleled with the colonial views and policies of whites as the superior race. Mechanically, military forces were used as tools to enact the genocide (the S.S. of Nazi Germany and the Force Publique of the Congo Free State). There are many places where the two genocides are similar, however, there are major differences. The aim of the Holocaust was an “ethnic cleansing” of Jews and other undesirables, total extermination was the goal of the Hitler and the Nazi party. Genocide became an official state policy and was run in a very pragmatic manner under heavy state control. It was direct and focused extermination, exemplified by the concentration camps. This contrasts the lack of state control in the Congo Free State, which the Belgian government had little control over. The genocide in the Congo was a by-product of colonial rule, the people were victims of Imperial greed. This shows that the Congolese genocide was less direct in nature when compared to the