Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison between the crucible play and the crucible movie
Symbolism within the crucible
Character analysis in the crucible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Comparing the Production of the Crucible to the Film My task was to compare the production of the crucible to the film. The things I had to compare were lighting, camera angles (only applies to the film), dramatic parts, characters and atmosphere effects. Lighting ======== In the play, at the start, the lighting was used to create a spooky atmosphere, which I thought was very good as the crucible is a spooky play. Lanterns hanging from the ceilings with a dim light made this effect. The audience would feel shivers as they could only see the actors faces. The rest of the body of each actor and actress was covered by the darkness, by the rest of the stage. The second scene was well done using the light effect. The whole of Proctors house was dark and gloomy. The light source came from a burning fire, which was at the front of the stage and an open back door at the back. The effect was that the audience would feel cold, as the stage temperature looked cold, and this was done as a symbol to show how Goody Proctor felt when she was accused of being a witch. The darkness matched the atmosphere. In the third scene, the light was coming from two windows in the courtroom. This meant that the light was just strong enough for the audience to see. This matched the stage atmosphere as things were not looking too bright for John Proctor. The darkness reinforced the gloominess. The outside light was also gloomy, which shows nothing is right around Abigail. In the final scene, only the centre of the stage was lit. This again shows gloominess. Prison cells are supposed to be dark so they don't look pleasant, and with the di... ... middle of paper ... ... the play. Rushed her lines. Abigail - dramatic, pale skin colour shows spookiness. Audience would hate the way her character was. Goody Proctor - good when lying in court and the way she trembled when she was shouted at. Made eye contact with the audience. Goody Proctor - again good when lying in court. She seemed more scared of dying. Proctor - made loads of eye contact when asked to turn his back by the courtroom judges. We could see his expression. He had a deep, forceful voice. Proctor - he had a deep voice again. Showed anger and emotion at the same time, as he kissed and pushed Abigail in the space of 30seconds. Betty - woke up and shouted when least expected. Shocked the audience. Betty - when getting bullied by Abigail, viewers would feel sorry for her as she is only nine years old.
Author Arthur Miller, of The Crucible an excellent job of showing the cruelty of the witch trials. The movie based upon The Crucible, is almost an exact replica of the book. When showing many similarities, it also had some vast differences. These differences don't have much of an effect on the actually story. They are added for dramatic effect and to entice the viewer. Although there are many similarities there are some vast differences.
1. Both Arthur Miller, the author of The Crucible, and James McTeigue, the director of V for Vendetta, both convey the idea that 'governments should be afraid of their people'. Both texts express how the governments could control their people; however that control can lead to anarchy. Miller explains how the people ‘were not quite the dedicated folk that arrived on the Mayflower, [as] a vast differentiation had taken place, and in their own time a revolution unseated the royal government… at this moment of power'. Expressing how the people were controlling the government and how they were consumed by the power that they held. McTeigue expresses how the government would initially manipulate the people with how they controlled them, by treating them as lower class and enforcing laws. However, V’s rebellion, starting with blowing up the Old Bailey, caused the government to slowly begin losing control over its people as V conveyed his message and the power slowly shifted as the people
audience will not be this was shown well in that he had lots of small
The Crucible, by Arthur Miller as well as Gattaca by Andrew Niccol use the protagonist of their texts to show disapproval of the societies that they have created. While both authors vary the presentation of their societies, they both explore the damaging qualities of the societies through their central protagonist. Gattaca, set in the not too distant future explores the effects of compulsory genetic modification on society while, contrastingly, conformity and the rules of the church are explored throughout The Crucible.
The Crucible the film is an adapted version of Arthur Miller’s play of the same name, which was inspired by the 1692 Salem Witch Trials in Salem, Massachusetts. The two main characters are Abigail Williams played by Winona Ryder and John Procter played by Daniel Day-Lewis. The Crucible’s opening scene is Reverend Parris catching Abigail and her friends dancing in the woods and conjuring spirits. Abigail did not want to get in trouble so she blamed Tituba, a Barbados slave, for making her drink chicken blood, and tempting her to sin.
The successful and what could have been successful societies in both Lord of the Flies and The Crucible eventually decayed and fell apart. There were struggles with good and evil in Salem and on the island that were the result of three main elements. Fear, misuse of power and fanatical religious beliefs were the cause of the two societies failure.
I’m sure you’ve debated with yourself many times the book or the movie. This essay proves to you why the movie version is so much better. John Proctor was without a single doubt the best character in The Crucible. The film did an impeccable job of conveying a much better picture of what truly happened in the years 1692 and 1693. Even though many people may consider the book to be the better version of The Crucible their reasons do not compare to the reasons I have written to prove that the movie is the best version. The movie did a much better version of giving us more details and more personality out of the characters such as John Proctor. In the book, John Proctor was a dry and dull character but in the movie, he is incredibly influential.
... Proctor himself was more indirect in resolving conflict where he didn’t want the events that had occurred to have happen. However McMurphy was trying to change the hospital’s normal routine and rules in order to prove a point that the other patients weren’t actually mental.
What does the word crucible mean? The word crucible means a severe test or trial. Throughout the novel, The Crucible, many of the characters go through their own crucible. These trials have a major or minor impact on the characters life throughout the novel. These trials all come together creating the story based on the calamity in America around 1952, which inspired Arthur Miller to write this well known novel. In the novel, there are many different examples from various characters about life lessons and choices. Although the book and play are very similar they do share many differences.
proud of. Proctor. He did not want them to be left with the name of a
wrong. Proctor is willing to risk everything, including his good name and even his life, to
Proctor's attempt to decide his fate is reinforced by stage directions within the script. When Proctor asks Elizabeth to help him decide his future, "He turns directly to her", creating intimacy between the characters. This is later revisited after Proctor's execution with the lighting directions describing "The new sun… pouring in on her face". Together the physical movement and lighting help to increase dramatic tension and create atmosphere.
Authors often have underlying reasons for giving their stories certain themes or settings. Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, The Crucible, is a work of art inspired by actual events as a response to political and moral issues. Set in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692, The Crucible proves to have its roots in events of the 1950’s and 1960’s, such as the activities of the House Un-American Committee and the “Red Scare.” Though the play provides an accurate account of the Salem witch trials, its real achievement lies in the many important issues of Miller’s time that it dealswith.
From spring of 1692 till 1693 there was a hysteria spreading throughout the village of Salem, Massachusetts. In class, we studied the hysteria that transpired in the Salem, Massachusetts witch trials. The class studied two different interpretations of the Salem Witch Trials by comparing “The Crucible” and “Three Sovereigns for Sarah”. These two works tried to explain, in different ways, what transpired during the Salem witch trials. I believe that Three Sovereigns for Sarah is a more accurate representation of the Salem, Massachusetts witch trials than The Crucible.
I think Proctor is to be admired for the way in which he handles this