Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Causes of the 1956 Hungarian revolution
Causes of the 1956 Hungarian revolution
Causes of the 1956 Hungarian revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Comparing the Events in Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968
Both of these events covered the same basic outline; a revolt, reforms
in the country and the USSR’s reaction to these modifications. However
in both cases the situation differed with many similarities and
differences.
Both events started with the same cause, dissatisfaction with
Communism and the restrictions that came with it. Both countries were
bitter about losing their freedom of speech and lived in fear of the
secret police, yet in Hungary this was present on a bigger scale. In
both countries current leaders were forced to resign and received no
support from the USSR. In Hungary this event was repeated as the
leader proceeding Rakosi was no better and public demonstrations
caused a change in government yet again.
Similarly both new leaders proved capable desiring reforms in the
country. In Hungary however, reforms were demanded on a different
level, as the Hungarians had no desire in keeping Communism and
staying in the Warsaw Pact. Nagy’s government wanted free elections,
impartial courts and farmland restored to private ownership. They
wanted the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Hungary and as I mentioned
their withdrawal from the Warsaw Pact, as well as to become neutral in
the Cold War. The new American President, Eisenhower, was actually
prepared to support new independent Hungary.
In Czechoslovakia however, current leader Dubcek, new the outcomes of
the Hungarian revolt and so did not want to make the same mistakes. He
specifically told the Soviet leader Brezhnev, that the Czechs have no
intention in leaving the Warsaw Pact as the Hungarians did but less
censorship, more freedom of speech and a reduction in the secret
police. As more and more changes took place there was even talk of
allowing another political party to be set up as a rival to the
Communists, the Social Democrats Party.
In both cases the Soviet response wasn’t a positive one, but different
actions were taken. In Hungary Khrushchev was ready to accept some of
A comparison of these two are Both leaders saw that changes were essential, they knew that without reforms, the Soviet Union would grow weaker and weaker. Khrushchev’s and Gorbachev’s reforms were wide and touched almost all important aspects of the government. One important aspect is how Khrushchev and Gorbachev saw the past and future. When Khrushchev came to power he had a big problem how to replace Stalin and how to rule the country after him. Stalin ruled through a cult of personality and many people thought that he was irreplaceable. At “the Twentieth Congress of the Khrushchev attacks Stalinism and the Cult of Personality in the secret speech, he denounced Stalin and the terror of his regime, everything Stalin did or said was incorrect,
How far do you agree that the communist government faced severe economic & political challenges in the years 1917-28?
During the 20th century, the rise of communism sparked rage in people throughout the world. More towards the end of the 1900's the fall of communism and dictatorships was just the beginning of what would eventually be a large democratic change for several countries. 1989: Democratic Revolutions at the Cold War's End, speaks about the change brought to several different countries from the 1980's-1990's and plans to show "the global transformations that marked the end of the cold war and shaped the era in which we live"(Pg V). During the cold war, communist had power and control over a large area and spread communism throughout several continents. This book specifically hits on six different studies of where communism and dictatorship affected these areas and what they did to stop it. Poland, Philippines, Chile, South Africa, Ukraine, and China throughout the end of the 20th century created revolutionary movements which brought them all one step closer to freeing themselves and creating democratic change.
Despite the appearance of goodwill exhibited in Khrushchev’s speeches, a Western leader would be inherently skeptical of the Stalin crony as he attempts to gain and maintain power over the Soviet Union and his own party. An obvious politician, Khrushchev’s “peaceful coexistence” and “Secret Speech” in February 1956 served to distance him from the unpopular and failing Stalinist approach of communist control. His rhetoric, however, remains no less expansionist than his predecessor. Specifically, in his comments on “peaceful coexistence”, Khrushchev emphasized the ultimate triumph of the socialist system, but concedes that military intervention alone will not achieve such a victory (Judge & Langdon, 339). Rhetoric aside, one must consider Khrushchev’s
During 1945 and early in 1946, the Soviet Union cut off nearly all contacts between the West and the occupied territories of Eastern Europe. In March 1946, former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill warned that "an iron curtain has descended across the Continent" of Europe. He made popular the phrase Iron Curtain to refer to Soviet barriers against the West (Kennedy 1034). Behind these barriers, the U.S.S.R. steadily expanded its power. In 1946, the U.S.S.R. organized Communist governments in Bulgaria and Romania. In 1947, Communists took control of Hungary and Poland. Communists seized full power in Czechoslovakia early in 1948. These countries became Soviet satellite nations controlled by the U.S.S.R. Albania already had turned to Communism. Yugoslavia also joined the Communist bloc. The Communist Party of Yugoslavia had helped drive out the Germans near the end of the war. Communists led by Josip Broz Tito then took over the government (Cold War). East and West opposed each other in the United Nations. In 1946, the U.S.S.R. rejected a U.S. proposal for an international agency to control nuclear energy production and research. The Soviet Union believed the United States had a lead in nuclear weapons and would have a monopoly if controls were approved. The Soviet Union pictured itself as a defender of peace and accused the United States of planning a third world war.
These two men were very demanding in obtaining what they thought should be the rule of a nation by their own personal control. Stalin and Hitler were very close in the same way that they had an aggressive vigor to force a type of commanding dictatorship into their respective countries. Each had a special army that they put in high regard politically to where they were considered special police agents. These armies were under different orders, but their main objectives were to stop anyone who opposed, or were thought to be in opposition to the head of state. Also, both Stalin and Hitler had ideas to improve the education levels and economic prosperity of their own countries, each trying to put their own at the top of the world in industry and commerce. Although Hitler and Stalin were opposed to each other’s own strategies and political stance on being a world dominator, they were very similar in the way to which they fought for political power.
In the years leading up to the Prague Spring, Antonín Novotný governed Czechoslovakia. He openly supported Stalinism, and under his power, the people of Czechoslovakia suffered from fierce government regulations, censorship and poor leadership decisions. Although he led the process of de-Stalinization (since Stalin’s death in 1953), the pace of change was extremely slow and thus the people called for more reforms. In May of 1966 the Czechoslovakians began to complain that the Soviets were exploiting them, this was the first spark that eventually lead to the flame of his overthrow. Furthermore, Czechoslovakia was an industrialized nation and the Soviet’s model of economy did not suit them, in fact it hurt Czechoslovakians, and lead to a decline in their economy. In fact, the conditions for the working class were a...
Hungary experienced not only Soviet occupation, but also political oppression and economic decline. Many were critical of Hungary’s problems due to Soviet control, especially political oppression. Hungary developed into a communist state under the severe, dictatorial rule of Mátyás Rákosi. During Rákosi’s control, the Security Police began a series of eliminations, starting with...
The spread of Communism and its ideals significantly increased during the final stages of the Chinese Civil War which intensified after the Second World War and resulted in a victory to the Communists in October 1949. At this time, the majority of the provinces in China were led by either the GMD or the CCP. However, the civilians in the GMD-ruled cities were suffering rapid inflation, strikes, violence and riots which led to a collapse of public order. Adding to this instability, corruption was rife within the Nationalist party’s leadership.... ... middle of paper ...
to assume the role of dictator. This was a phenomenon which was to become a
After World War I there was a Russian Revolution in 1917 that scared many American’s which was known as the Red Scare. Bolsheviks wanted a worldwide revolution and were attempting to gain momentum. The American people saw this and thought that the United States could possibly be overthrown by communism. Though there were only about 25,000 American Communists at this time and they made themselves come off as a serious threat when a string of strikes broke out across America. There were more than 4,000 strikes that involved over 4 million workers in 1919. Government, while the majority were striking for higher wages, shorter days, and workplace control, many Americans feared the worst and believed communism was on the rise. Corporations liked
Since the Soviet Union was the world’s only communist country at this time, they had many enemies, and they needed protection. One of the Soviet Union’s main objectives during this time was to weaken other European democracies by promoting internal disruption within the governments of Europe. This would make the world safer for the world’s only communist country (Greenville
Over the next few years, Russia went through a traumatic time of civil war and turmoil. The Bolsheviks’ Red Army fought the white army of farmers, etc. against Lenin and his ways. Lenin and the Bolsheviks won and began to wean Russia of non-conforming parties eventually banning all non-communist as well as removing an assembly elected shortly after the Bolshevik’s gain of power. Lenin’s strict government, however, was about to get a lot stricter with his death in 1924.
The Communist Party of Czechoslovakia had these specific reforms spelled out in its Action Program:
Between 1985 and 1991, the youngest individual in decades to become head of the Soviet Communist Party dominated the history of the Soviet Union. Mikhail Gorbachev launched a program of political and economic reform that dramatically affected domestic life and the place of his country in world affairs. The Soviet dictatorship was transformed into a multiparty state in which the Communist Party had to struggle to maintain a role. Meanwhile, the Soviet Union moved toward a free-market economy. With equal drama, the longstanding Cold War with the United States diminished and then turned into a cooperative relationship.