Comparing the Books, Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the Sixties and The Sixties: Y

776 Words2 Pages

Comparing the Books, Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the Sixties and The Sixties: Years of Hope, Days of Rage

The preface to Peter Collier and David Horowitz's Destructive

Generation: Second Thoughts About the Sixties and the introduction to Todd

Gitlin's The Sixties: Years of Hope, Days of Rage both try to explain the

authors' reasons for writing their books. Both books, based on nostalgia,

deal with the good and the bad which have come out of the sixties. However,

while Collier and Horowitz describe the sixties more as a time of

destruction, Gitlin places more emphasis on the spirited atmosphere which

led to the destruction. This destruction they all refer to includes the

diminished placement of trust in America, the rising problem of drugs, and

the overall havoc created throughout the country. Therefore, the authors

give two very different descriptions of the era of which they were all a

part.

Even in the beginnings of the works, the differences are very

noticeable. Collier and Horowitz begin by trying to describe a "summary

moment" (Collier and Horowitz 11) of the decade. This "moment" involves a

revolutionary group known as the Black Panther Party. The authors seem to

criticize this group by commenting on their appearances and their actions

in certain events. For example, at a cocktail party, one Panther spit in

the face of an army draftee because he brought a black friend from the army

home while on leave. When the Panther returned to the party, the people

present pretended not to notice that anything had happened. Later, when

misunderstandings occurred between two guests at the party which resulted

in one of them making a racial remark, anger was fueled in the group and

among others who had heard about the event. Collier and Horowitz, when

remarking on their reactions, emphasize that while in ordinary times the

event would not have caused many problems, during the sixties, people

considered it more of a sign that revolution was worthwhile. Perhaps the

authors were suggesting that the revolution was created out of exaggerated

problems or that those leading the revolution, such as the Black Panthers,

did not quite understand why they were leading it. Collier and Horowitz

seem imply this belief through the portrayal of the Panthers as uneducated

when listening to Genet speak on their behalf: "The Panthers milled around

in sullen incomprehension as he talked" (P.12). These tend to be their

reasons for why the revolution caused so much destruction.

On the other hand, Gitlin begins his introduction by describing his

More about Comparing the Books, Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the Sixties and The Sixties: Y

Open Document