Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Romeo and Juliet compare and contrast from new versions to original
Romeo and Juliet comparison with text and 1968 and 1996 version
Romeo and Juliet comparison with text and 1968 and 1996 version
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Comparing a Modern and Older Version of Romeo and Juliet Film The modern was directed by Baz Luhrman staring Leonardo-De-Capreo as Romeo this was a contempary version set in the modern fictional city of Verona, which was based on Miami. The Franco Zefferelli is set in renaissance Italy and sticks very closely to the actual Shakespeare script. I will compare them by the usage of props, costume and the setting, at the end I will assess them on how they would fair in front of a teenage audience. I have only looked at the first few obvious aspects of the play but even now I think my conclusion will be that the Baz Luhrman would be liked more because it is contemporary and a teenage audience can relate to a contemporary version, an older version will always be second best unless it could persuade those watching that I was better and I don’t think it is. The Baz Luhrman version was interesting because it used the contrast of mostly modern props such as guns and cars which an teenage audience can relate to and the original speech, this made the film watch able, as if you did not concentrate you would get lost but because it was a good script the watcher would become increasingly interested as the story unveiled. In the film different costume was also used to bring the story as far away from renaissance Italy as possible, instead of what could be expected such as normal casual clothes along the theme of Miami, Hawaiian shirts were used on the main characters, I think to create more relaxed persona of the inhabitants of Verona even though the is a feud that is claiming lives in some cases. Also all of the gang members were gun holsters very openly and in there free time they play with them as if they were not guns but toys. One of the most influential characters is the priest who saves Romeo from being caught by the police who have banned him from entering Verona, the priest wares also a Hawaiian shirt when he is not in his
Finally, the conflict it is how to kill
Romeo and Juliet is a play about two lovers who have to risk their lives in order to demonstrate their love and will to stay together, regardless the feud between their families. By the end, the death of Romeo and Juliet finally bring the reconciliation to these two families. It is fate that the two most shall-not meet people fall in love and it love that eventually won against hatred. Since then, there have been many different versions of Romeo and Juliet, whether it was for film, stage, musicals. These different recontextualised adaptions change the original play by many ways, some modernise the language, environment, props as well as changing the original characteristics of some characters. Out of all the different adaptions of Romeo and Juliet, two stood out the most. One was the Romeo and Juliet (1996) and directed by Baz Luhrmann and the other one was Romeo and Juliet Broadway (2013) play version,
A Comparison of the Interpretations of Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet Having studied the openings of two film versions, the two directors Franco Zeffirelli and Baz Luhrmann, show they interpret the play differently because of the way they see different meanings in them. By interpreting the play differently, it also means the audience pick up a different meaning. Every image seen in the beginning decides whether the audience should continue with watching the film. But what makes a film so engaging?
The Major Differences Between Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were
Juliet’ due to the fact that his film work was about youth and how its
Chloe Fleming investigates Baz Luhrmann’s capability in embodying Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet in his own modern film adaptation and praises the hell out of it.
Have people ever wondered which is better actually reading the the Romeo and Juliet play that's about true love or being lazy and watching the movie first and go off that ? There are major differences in comparison from the actual play from 1595 to the movie that was made in 1969. That Zeffirelli had chosen to changed while directing the Romeo and Juliet Movie were scenes like the balcony,the fighting, and the very end of Romeo and Juliet Scenes. Why did he do it no one really knows why he did.
Baz Lurhmann’s creation of the film Romeo and Juliet has shown that today’s audience can still understand and appreciate William Shakespeare. Typically, when a modern audience think of Shakespeare, they immediately think it will be boring, yet Lurhmann successfully rejuvenates Romeo and Juliet. In his film production he uses a number of different cinematic techniques, costumes and a formidably enjoyable soundtrack; yet changes not one word from Shakespeare’s original play, thus making it appeal to a modern audience.
‘Romeo and Juliet’ is a tragic play about two star crossed lovers written by Shakespeare in 1595. The play is a timeless teenage tradgedy. “The play champions the 16th Century belief that true love always strikes at first sight,” (Lamb 1993: Introduction) and even in modern times an audience still want to believe in such a thing as love at first sight. Act II Scene II the balcony scene displays that romantic notion perfectly.
music changes to show that she is sad. We then get a close up of
Romeo and Juliet - Movie vs. Book & nbsp; Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend. They are correct. It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet was written. centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo. and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts. The play had better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a better presentation of the. & nbsp; One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood. An example of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and Juliet is very serious. The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4).
One of the most celebrated plays in history, “Romeo and Juliet”, was written by William Shakespeare in the late 16th century. It is a story about two lovers that have to meet in secret because of an ongoing family feud. Tragically, because of their forbidden love Romeo and Juliet take their lives so they can be together. In 1997, a movie was adapted from the play “Romeo and Juliet”, directed by Baz Lurhmann. However, as alike as the movie and the play are, they are also relatively different.
William Shakespeare has provided some of the most brilliant plays to ever be performed on the stage. He is also the author of numerous sonnets and poems, but he is best known for his plays such as Hamlet, Macbeth, A Midsummer Night's Dream, and Romeo and Juliet. In this essay I would like to discuss the play and movie, "Romeo and Juliet", and also the movie, Shakespeare in Love.
In both final movie scenes of Romeo and Juliet, Romeo takes his life, because of Juliet's supposed death. Although, there are differences between the 1968 and 1996 versions. In both movies Juliet hears her own spoken words and begins to cry, becoming unstable, eventually leading to her taking her own life. The pure feeling she encounters leads to her death, knowing that only a matter of minutes would have saved her and her love. Therefore, Romeo and Juliet seeing each other briefly in the 1996 version adds unnecessary drama, as the 1968 depiction of the scene gives the audience more a more emotional view.
One of the greatest questions addressed in both Romeo and Juliet and Shakespeare in Love is the question "does love conquer all?" Should one follow his heart or should one conform to society's view as to what is proper? In the movie, love does in fact conquer all, but, in the play, it does not. In the play Romeo and Juliet decide to follow their hearts and they do not conform to society's wishes. Romeo and Juliet end up dead and the feud between the Montagues and Capulets is over. In the case of Shakespeare in Love, Will loses Viola but his love for her lives on as seen in his later writings. So, one could argue that in some instances love does indeed conquer all and, in other cases, it does not. Following the path of true love can be a tragic one as seen in Romeo and Juliet. As for Shakespeare in Love, both characters meet society's wishes and therefore return to their normal lives never being quite the same.