Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis
After twenty years of literary analysis
Literary analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary analysis
The two works of focus are James Wright’s poem Lying in a Hammock at William Duffy’s Farm in Pine Island, Minnesota, and Emily Dickinson’s poem I heard a Fly buzz-when I died. The formal features that will be used to analyze these works are the use of first person singular speaker, and content type. In addition, these two formal features work together to in each poem to clarify the illustration of the main idea. Interestingly, content type and first person singular speaker are used quite similarly in each work, but with their own small variations.
Before analyzing these two works, the two formal features must be understood first. Using a first person singular speaker means the poet is using I statements frequently and is talking about themselves.
…show more content…
For example, each work hardly mentions anyone else, besides the poet in a series of I statements. As for the type of content, it will be described as focusing on images, thoughts, or both. For instance, both poems portray images of the physical surroundings, and include the poets’ intuitions. Moreover, the formal features help the reader comprehend the poets’ illustrations of the main ideas, and know the messages that are being presented. Although these formal features are present in each poem, they are not used in the exact same way. Dickinson and Wright use first person singular speaker quite similarly in certain instances within their works. For example, all of Wright’s work uses his own view alone on the situation being illustrated. In addition, most of Dickinson’s poem also maintains a steady focus on her interpretation of her physical surroundings. To put it another way, both works only or mainly consider the poet’s perspective, and mostly leave out the perspective of other people and/or any other outside view point to portray their works. In essence, the focus on the poets’ outlook allows the reader to understand the poem’s overall message much better because it gives the reader the sense of looking through the poet’s eyes instead of simply trying to imagine it on the reader’s own. Even though this in an instance when the two poets use the first person singular speaker similarly, they do not do so continuously. Wright and Dickinson do in fact implement their own subtle variations into the first person singular speaker. Wright’s poem takes a narrow focus on images he is illustrating, and his thoughts alone. For example, Wright only portrays the physical surroundings around him and thoughts that only concern himself, while never directly mentioning the involvement of any other person. Keeping a narrow focus on himself within the imagery and perceptions of his work makes it obvious that Wright’s main messages pertain to solely himself. On the other hand, Dickinson’s work manages to mention images and ideas that are not all about her. For instance, Dickinson illustrates other grieving people in the same room as her deathbed, and implements messages associated with these other people. Choosing to include other people in the imagery of her poem leads the reader to believe Dickinson’s main messages pertain to people outside of herself. In other words, Wright’s use of first person singular speaker is far more egocentric than Dickinson’s use of the formal feature. Additionally, these subtle differences in the way first person singular speaker is implemented allows the reader to realize Dickinson’s work goes a bit beyond her own reality, and that Wright’s poem just stays in his own reality. Even though first person singular speaker makes the similarities and differences between these work obvious, they can be compared on another formal feature. Content type is another formal feature Dickinson and Wright can be analyzed on. Specifically, the use of thoughts within the poets’ content. Dickinson illustrates multiple thoughts of her own within her work. For instance, Dickinson portrays a series of her thoughts on ideas such as death, spirituality, and humans in the natural world. Including her thoughts on humans in the natural world, spirituality, and death allow the reader to comprehend that her poem is mentioning multiple thoughts of hers, and that each idea is significant in its own way. As for Wright’s work, it illustrates a single one of his conceptions. For instance, Wright includes his opinion on his life decisions and overall success in the last line of his poem. Implementing his single thought at the end of his work shows the reader that it contains one main idea that is the focus of the entire poem. Thus, the similar inclusion of the poets’ thoughts allows the reader to essentially see into the minds of the poets, which makes understanding the main messages of their works significantly easier. Interestingly, the content of these works shares another characteristic. Wright and Dickinson also implement images of their imagined or possibly current physical setting at the time, within their content.
For example, Dickinson’s poem illustrates her laying on her deathbed while a fly is buzzing around the room. Furthermore, Wright’s work portrays him lying in a hammock on a farm while noticing the animals and nature that are apart of it. The implementation of images in both works gives the reader the sense of looking through the eyes of the poet, which can clarify the main idea because the physical setting usually goes hand in hand with the main idea. To put it another way the similar use of imagery in the content of these poems provides an additional resource that helps the reader understand the main point of the poem. However, the content of these works is not completely …show more content…
alike. Plenty of differences exist between the content of the Dickinson and Wright works. Specifically, each poet portrays their thoughts in a different manner. For instance, Wright only includes one conception of the quality of his life in the last line of his work. Wright’s decision to only include one of his thoughts allows the reader to recognize his poem has a single central idea, instead of a cluster of numerous messages. On the other hand, Dickinson portrays her thoughts on death, spirituality and other themes throughout her entire poem. Dickinson’s choice of multiple thoughts clarifies that her work is meant to address various ideas, instead of just a central message. In essence, both poets do include their conceptions in their content, but do so in their own unique ways that help the reader grasp the main messages of each work. Interestingly, the content of these works contains another difference. The content of Dickinson and Wright also differs in terms of the portrayal of images.
Wright’s images are most likely based on actual objects and beings he is seeing with his own eyes. For instance, his images consist of various features he is noticing about a farm while laying on a hammock. Wright’s images of actual objects and beings allow the reader to infer that his poem is connect to actual events in his life instead of being purely based on his current mood. However, Dickinson’s images are most likely based on objects and beings she is imagining in her mind, because it is very hard to believe someone on their deathbed was writing poetry. Dickinson’s use of imagined images clarifies her main messages because it strongly suggests they are connected to her current mental state, instead of literal events in her life. Therefore, the content of these works includes numerous images, but each work uses them differently to illustrate their main
ideas. In conclusion, these works use the formal features of first person singular speaker and content type similarly, while including their own variations. Additionally, the unique variations in the way each poet uses the formal features allows the message and/or messages of their work to be portrayed more clearly. Furthermore, these formal features seem to clarify the messages of these poems in a more effective manner than different formal features of other works. Other poems use people and/or objects as the speaker/interpreter, which makes comprehending the overall meaning quite a bit more challenging. In addition, other works are composed of images or thoughts alone which can make interpreting their main ideas difficult, because there can be so many different thoughts that do not seem to be connected or there can be only images that do not appear to be suggesting anything concrete. Thus, Wright’s use of the formal features enhance the clarity of the main message of his poem, which is that he thinks his life is unfulfilled. Additionally, Dickinson's use of the formal features improve the main idea of her work, which is that she is thinking about death and where she will go after.
Authors use many different types of imagery in order to better portray their point of view to a reader. This imagery can depict many different things and often enhances the reader’s ability to picture what is occurring in a literary work, and therefore is more able to connect to the writing. An example of imagery used to enhance the quality of a story can be found in Leyvik Yehoash’s poem “Lynching.” In this poem, the imagery that repeatably appears is related to the body of the person who was lynched, and the various ways to describe different parts of his person. The repetition of these description serves as a textual echo, and the variation in description over the course of the poem helps to portray the events that occurred and their importance from the author to the reader. The repeated anatomic imagery and vivid description of various body parts is a textual echo used by Leyvik Yehoash and helps make his poem more powerful and effective for the reader and expand on its message about the hardship for African Americans living
There are multiple examples of visual imagery in this poem. An example of a simile is “curled like a possum within the hollow trunk”. The effect this has is the way it creates an image for the reader to see how the man is sleeping. An example of personification is, “yet both belonged to the bush, and now are one”. The result this has is how it creates an emotion for the reader to feel
Imagery is an integral part of any narrative. The multiple narratives and cross observations made in As I Lay Dying are complex and they consist of many spectrums. Imagery alone can be sufficient to give the reader a rich sense of emotion, but when it symbolizes the themes of the story and reflects on the characteristics of the narrator it is truly a master piece. Imagery has been used by William Faulkner to create parallels that strengthen the themes of the story. The imagery is used a tool to appeal to the reader to convey the authors purpose.
Imagery is a key part of any poem or literary piece and creates an illustration in the mind of the reader by using descriptive and vivid language. Olds creates a vibrant mental picture of the couple’s surroundings, “the red tiles glinting like bent plates of blood/ the
While these works by Whitman and Dickinson are different in many ways, a few similarities can be found between the two. The most obvious of these similarities involves the themes and subject matter of the pieces. Both poems present the idea that life is a continuous and constant circle and that no one is ever really dead as long as he is remembered. Each also suggests that Earth is a living thing which all humans are a piece of in both life and death. Another likeness which can be found in these two poems is the imagery used by the authors. Through Whitman's detailed and vivid description, he allows the reader to form a clear picture of the scene in his head. Likewise, Dickinson use of personification causes the poem to come alive in the reader's mind. Indeed, by observing the themes and imagery found in these two poems, one can see that they do contain some similarities.
Dickinson, Emily. “I heard a fly buzz – when I died.” Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and writing. Seventh Edition. X.J. Kennedy, Dana Gioia. Saddle River. Pearson Education, 2013. 776. Print.
Comparing and Contrasting Dickinson’s Poems, Because I Could Not Stop for Death and I Heard a Fly Buzz - When I Died
Imagery is one of the many ways Edgar Allen Poe used to convey his message. At the beginning of the poem, the reader can instantly recognize imagery. A man is sitting in his study trying to distract himself from the sadness of a woman who has left him.
In both Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman’s works, they emphasize some differences in their writing. In Dickinson’s works she shows that her works are short and simple poems, while Whitman’s poems and often long and complex. With Dickinson showing that her works are short and simple, while Whitman brings on a more sophisticated style, it truly shows that they use their own unique style of writing. In both Whitman and Dickinson works they have been known for being such unique artist and being original, while people try so hardly to impersonate their style, but they are unable to come close to accomplishing it. Whitman wrote in ambitious proportions, while creating a style of rhythmic structure, creating stanzas and complex lines.
Emily Dickinson and Robert Frost both think that individuality is very important to a person equally like Ralph Emerson. Although they may have a lot in common these poets are different in many ways. Both Frost and Dickinson were American poets and were both from New England. A big similarity between Frost and Dickinson both talk about death. Emily Dickinson and Robert Frost both talk about the power of nature in their poetry. Frost and Dickinson have a reasonable evidence on why human beings should live life to their own agenda but, what if that person cannot stop living somebody else dreams? How can these poems help people break away for society and become a strong confidence individual person?
Similar to Shakespeare, Dickinson choses to put into use the iambic pentameter. The use of the meter enhances the poem, enabling the reader to go through the text with an easy rhythm in which one can digest the passage. “I Heard a Fly Buzz- When I Died” is a very complex poem, that may be difficult to analyze, but by breaking the poem apart piece by piece, using the iambic pentameter, analyzation becomes much easier. “I heard /a Fly /buzz - when /I died -/” (1) the pentameter stresses heard, fly, when, and died. Using those clues it is noted that the speaker is perhaps no longer living, based on the fact that he or she said “when” and “died”, which is past tense.the next three lines “The Still/ness in/ the Room/, Was like/ the Still/ness in/ the Air -/, Between /the Heaves/ of
Imagery is a big component to most works of poetry. Authors strive to achieve a certain image for the reader to paint in their mind. Dickinson tries to paint a picture of ?death? in her own words. Thomas A. Johnson, an interpretive author of Dickinson's work, says that ?In 1863 Death came into full statue as a person. ?Because I could not stop for Death? is a superlative achievement wherein Death becomes one of the greatest characters of literature? (Johnson). Dickinson's picture to the audience is created by making ?Death? an actual character in the poem. By her constantly calling death either ?his? or ?he,? she denotes a specific person and gender. Dickinson also compares ?Death? to having the same human qualities as the other character in the poem. She has ?Death? physically arriving and taking the other character in the carriage with him. In the poem, Dickinson shows the reader her interpretation of what this person is going through as they are dying and being taken away by ?Death?. Dickinson gives images such as ?The Dews drew quivering and chill --? and ?A Swelling of the Ground --? (14, 18). In both of these lines, Dickinson has the reader conjure up subtle images of death. The ?quivering an chill? brings to the reader's mind of death being ...
Dickinson, Emily. A. I heard a fly buzz. Norton Anthology of English Literature. Ed. M. h. Abrams.
Emily Dickinson and John Greenleaf Whittier were both exuberantly creative writers. Dickinson’s Hope is a thing with feathers and Whittier’s Snowbound prove that fact. Both writers were very strategic in how and what they wrote and it is because of that, that they are two of the greatest writers in early America. Dickinson and Whittier used vivid imagery to tap into a person’s senses and to help a person truly feel as if they were in a poem. Both Dickinson in her Hope is a thing with feathers and Whittier’s Snowbound both used imagery to a great extent.
First, the author reveals their style through the first-person point of view that they use throughout the poem. The entirety of the poem is written in two characters’ perspectives,