Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion of Oedipus' downfall
What is responsible for the downfall of the oedipus
Conclusion of Oedipus' downfall
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion of Oedipus' downfall
Less Is More When comparing Ulysses and Oedipus, many apparent differences can be seen. Both men are kings but view their sovereignty differently. Oedipus likes being king. He cares for his people and “his heart is heavy with the city’s pain, his own, and the people’s pain.” (i.63-34). When he is informed of the reasoning behind the plague in Thebes, Oedipus is determined to stop at nothing until Laius’s killer is avenged and the city is free of its suffering. Meanwhile, Ulysses is rather unhappy as a king. He is utterly bored and discontent with his life. He emphasizes this by saying he “cannot rest from travel” (6) and feels as though he is “always roaming with a hungry heart.”(12) Needless to say, Ulysses is a restless man that knows sitting …show more content…
Both Oedipus and Ulysses believe that knowledge is the key to fulfilling or, in some cases, avoiding the purpose of their lives. In Oedipus the King, Oedipus discovers his destiny and flees from home making him feel as though he succeeded in keeping the prophecy from coming true. So that he “might never see cruel fulfilment of that oracle,” (ii.797-798) Oedipus never returns to Corinth, the place where his parents rule. By not returning home, Oedipus assumes this will ensure that the prophecy will not happen and he can protect his parents. This reveals his desire to do what is right and how he feels his decision is beneficial for not only his parents, but himself as well. The idea that one can improve themselves through knowledge is also exhibited by Ulysses. Ulysses will not be satisfied until he has gained more knowledge from his experiences. He longs “to follow knowledge like a sinking star, beyond the utmost bounds of human thought.” (31-32). Ulysses wants to become more knowledgeable. His desire is to travel and learn. This desire is emphasized when he says his purpose in life is “to sail beyond the sunset, and the baths of all of the western stars, until I die.” (59-61). This reveals his feelings towards adventures. He believes there is more to adventuring than just gaining experiences and learning. Even though Oedipus and Ulysses want knowledge …show more content…
Ultimately, Oedipus’s decision to leave Corinth hurts him and his family. “I who am proved accursed in my conception, and in my marriage, and in him I slew.” (iv.1184-1185). Now Oedipus has discovered that he did fulfil the prophecy. Because of Oedipus’s irrational decision, he eventually causes harm to his family. Not only does Jocasta kill herself, but he gouges his own eyes out and exiles himself from Thebes like he promised he would Laius’s murderer. Because of Jocasta’s suicide and his exile, he has left his children without their parents. Eventually this will cause turmoil among them. His brother-in-law, Creon, is made king of Thebes even after he explicitly explained how he did not desire to be king. The concept that the knowledge sought can make one desert their responsibilities and hurt the ones they love is displayed by Ulysses too. Because Ulysses yearns to explore and learn, he abandons his role as king, his family, and his people and degrades them as well. Ulysses states that while he is gone his son will “work his works and I mine.” (43). He describes his subjects as “a savage race that hoard, and sleep, and feed, and know me not.” (4-7). Although Ulysses feels as though his son is a better ruler than him, he drops everything he is doing and hands over all of his responsibilities to his son. Ulysses even insults
Throughout the Catholic Bible, there are multiple verses warning the reader about the harms of excessive pride. Proverbs 16:18 states, “Prides goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.” The story of Lucifer, more commonly known as Satan or the Devil, is a quintessential example of how pride can lead to a downfall. As the story goes, before he was evil, Lucifer was the strongest and most beautiful archangel in God’s army. Thinking he was all-powerful and thirsty for more power, he denounced the works of God, built an army of demons, and fought a battle against him. In the end, Lucifer was defeated and cast into Hell where he was renamed Satan. Much like Lucifer, King Oedipus and Anakin Skywalker experienced downfalls due to pride. Not only are their
won) fighting a war against the city of Troy and has been held captive by
Oedipus becomes a more admirable character by the end of the play then during the prologue of the play. This is because his history is reveled and his fate seems to be less of his fault and more of something that was doomed to happen to him, also by his drive to help the city of Thebes shows that he cares for the city and his ability to accept his fate but to try and help others from suffering.
The tradition of the tragedy, the renowned form of drama based on human suffering that invokes an accompanying catharsis, has principally become a discontinued art. Plays that evoke the sense of tragedy-the creations of Sophocles, Euripides, and William Shakespeare-have not been recreated often, nor recently due to its complex nature. The complexity of the tragedy is due to the plot being the soul of the play, while the character is only secondary. While the soul of the play is the plot, according to Aristotle, the tragic hero is still immensely important because of the need to have a medium of suffering, who tries to reverse his situation once he discovers an important fact, and the sudden downturn in the hero’s fortunes. Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman is the modern tragedy of a common man named Willy Loman, who, like Oedipus from Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, exhibits some qualities of a tragic hero. However, the character Willy Loman should not be considered a full-on tragic hero because, he although bears a comparable tragic flaw in his willingness to sacrifice everything to maintain his own personal dignity, he is unlike a true tragic hero, like Oedipus, because he was in full control of his fate where Oedipus was not.
In Plato’s Gorgias Callicles states that “the stronger sort of man” can take advantage of the weaker. When he states this I believe he was talking about himself in general because in his eyes he saw himself as strong. He also states “Natural justice is that the better and wiser man should rule over and have more than the inferior.” He states it this way because Socrates gives him an example of how a slave can be stronger physically than his master, and therefore can be considered stronger and take advantage of his master, in which Callicles disagrees with. Thrasymachus states “…justice is nothing else than the interest of the strong…” which goes hand in hand with what Callicles states, and I believe they are both are in agreement towards the stronger being better. However, Thrasymachus believes in the benefit of the stronger “people” as in the society, because he states “stronger” while Callicles believes in the “stronger man.” Thrasymachus explains that the rules benefit the people, it is unjustly to just benefit oneself, but those are the people who can take over the people who act justly. To act just, is to sacrifice your desires, and be taken advantage of indefinitely.
Sophocles' trilogy of Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, and Antigone is a powerful, tragic tale that examines the nature of human guilt, fate and punishment. Creon, Oedipus' uncle and brother-in-law, is the story's most dynamic character. His character experiences a drastic metamorphosis through the span of the three dramas. Creon's vision of a monarch's proper role, his concept of and respect for justice, as well as his respect for the design evolve considerably by the trilogy's tragic conclusion.
The most obvious comparison is that Ulysses and his fellow escapees are based off of Odysseus and his crewman from the Odyssey. In many ways Ulysses and Odysseus resemble one another, from their main goal to both having a major weakness. Ulysses’ goal in the movie is to return home to his wife before she gets remarried to some insignificant low life. Odysseus had the same goal; wanting to return home to his family and doing so before his wife remarries an unworthy suitor. In the book “The Odyssey” Odysseus wants to go home because, in addition to stopping the marriage, he is also homesick. We are told this in book 1 line 15 and 16 “Only Odysseus Still longed to return to his home and his wife.” This comes up again in book 5 line 208-209 “Still, I want to go back. My heart aches for the day I return to my home.” It is
Oedipus the King and Othello are both plays in which are known for their dramatic tragedies. Oedipus the King is an Athenian tragedy by Sophocles that was first performed in 429 BC. The Tragedy of Othello, the Moor of Venice is a tragedy by William Shakespeare, which was written in approximately 1603. These two plays do a profound job at making sure the audience understands the background of the main characters, however, there are minor characters who are just as important. Emilia, Othello’s wife, and Jocasta, Oedipus’s mother and wife, both aid in the understanding of the major characters throughout these plays. These two plays showcase the power of love and how destructive it can be.
Oedipus was in pursuit of the truth to find out what really happened with his birth and life. Oedipus was searching for the truth and needed to know all the facts in order to convict the murderer. "Ah! All of it was destined to be true!" (Literature, Oedipus the King, Ln.
Oedipus shows himself as being very pridefull when he leaves his adopted parents in Corinth. Oedipus leaves after he is told about his destiny from an old prophet. The prophet tells Oedipus that he will one day kill his father and marry his mother. Fearing this, Oedipus decides to leave Cornith. In doing this he is going against the gods, he is saying that he is not going to let this happen to him and he is going to control his own destiny.
He did not show some remorse towards the death of his mom Jocasta by leaving Thebes, but blinding himself as his last act of king showed no strength as a ruler of Thebes. Other people might think differently because “text spring from individual contexts are read by different people, the signs of discourage will always have a multiplicity of meanings” (Demir 84) that differentiate minds. Taking the sight of life does not make any situation better nor it will bring someone back for the dead. He did this due to the fact that he was angry at everything that he has done. I think that Oedipus has a great amount of integrity that makes him a well-liked person, but that is the only thing he really has. He showed strength towards the end of the play when he was leaving Thebes, which made him look like he was not dying inside of hurt and disgust. The message that I perceived from the play is that he has no courage. This is because instead of trying to fix things, he decides that blinding himself and leaving Thebes is the best option, which is helping no one.
...old age or barriers, he will always strive to fulfill his goals. The experiences of Odysseus and Ulysses are tributes to the power of the human spirit; one can achieve much if they are determined.
Elizabeth Kubler Ross, in Death and Dying, discusses the stages one goes through when he or she comes to terms with his or her own fate. These stages include Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, and Acceptance. In Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex, and the medieval morality play, Everyman, by and anonymous author, both the title characters travel through these stages throughout the plot when they come to meet their fates or misfortunes.
For Oedipus, prophecy is not the main source of his fall towards society; rather, his hubris blinds himself from recognizing his personal sin in the world, thus leading to his demise. Sophocles even skillfully uses a metaphor through the words “ as led by a guide” to further explain the “supernatural being” that ultimately decides the tragic fate of the family of Oedipus. In addition, through the death of Jocasta, the reader is immediately attuned of Oedipus’ raging moment of violence and will be petrified by the overwhelming power of the gods, thus realizing the importance of being cautious before making a final choice. Indeed, after an individual settles on a decision, the gods take control of the person’s fate, hurling numerous consequences to him if he makes the wrong decision. Moreover, as Oedipus suddenly becomes the unintended victim of the gods through his sinful decision to execute Laius, he is forced to relinquish his predominate impetus for pridefulness in exchange for a heart of deep realization and forgiveness. At the end of the play, Oedipus sacrifices everything in order to remove his guilt through the consequences of his atrocious actions witnessed by the gods. After Oedipus realizes the astringent fate he was destined to encounter through his sinful murder of Laius, he immediately attempts to take responsibility for his
Here is a story where Oedipus the King, who has accomplished great things in his life, discovers that the gods were only playing with him. He has everything a man of that time could want; he is king of Thebes, he has a wonderful wife and children, and great fame through out the lands. He has lived a good life, but in the end everything is taken from him.