Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative analysis essay
Comparative analysis essay
Comparative analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparative analysis essay
In this essay, I will be analyzing the meaning of the two pictures shown above that are found on the internet. Both pictures are very vivid with minimal use of color. The two images such as the ones shown are used to spread awareness against the use of dirty needles, along with the risk of HIV/AIDS that come with it. The first picture caught my attention due to the giant needle stretched across the entirety of the image. While as the second picture did a good use of using the one white/ clean person that separated it from all the red/infected people. Each picture has a unique way of expressing the idea and creating a suspense towards the viewer's feelings. The two pictures display very bold statements along with their art. Although the first picture used superior words, the second picture does a better job of putting it into perspective. Neither picture display bad views, nor do they lack in the sense of making a viewer think about the statement being made. The two pictures follow the same color scheme; black, red, and white. The variety of dark black and off white with bright red, make the two pictures appealing to the bystanders eye. Both pictures display or lack …show more content…
ethos, pathos, and logos. Throughout the two pictures, ethos is displayed very well.
The creators do a good job of strongly appealing the picture on both a physical and emotional aspect. Emotions are touched by the strong use of language and the vibrant colors. The three colors make it untroubled for someone to connect to the negative effects that come about when sharing dirty needles. Colors such as red, white, and black are displayed to represent life, shadow, and light. Bolded words displayed in the first picture one show the major problem. They state, “AIDS CAN BLOW YOUR HIGH”. This draws the viewer's attention due to the immense word choice. While this happens, the image begins to arise and become more appealing to the viewer’s eye. A needle is displayed in the image as it relates to the dirty needles used by drug
users. Picture two has a different approach. When the picture displays nine red people it’s displaying the nine out of ten people who used dirty needles and now test positive for HIV/AIDS. The image also shows one out of ten people who aren’t infected, also, who doesn’t use a dirty needle. Related to the people displayed on the picture, the bold words across the bottom of the image state, “BE THE ONE WHO DOESN’T”. This sends a viewer into deep thought about the pressure, negative-choices, and the consequences that come from the use of dirty needles.While the use of dirty needles is popular, drug users admit that they have no other options. Logos is displayed strongly in the picture. The second picture states a stronger logos argument when it states a real fact. It displays a statement that says “9 out of 10 people who share injection needles test positive for HIV/AIDS”. While picture two displays the strongest logos argument, picture one lacks a logos argument. The first picture doesn’t state any facts, it states much of a persuasive opinion. A strong opinion displayed is “AIDS CAN BLOW YOUR HIGH”. This opinion can change someone's choice of using dirty needles, but it does not display real world statistics. The main group that the first picture draws attention to is worried drug users. Also, picture two is displaying a stronger pathos statement. The viewers connect to the image on a stronger emotional level. The way the creator portrays the consequences creates a powerful mindset. When the image displays “BE THE ONE WHO DOESN’T” it is convincing the user to stand out, not risking their chances of contracting HIV/AIDS. Most people who share dirty needles aren’t worried about the consequences that come with it. Picture one also shares an intense pathos representation. It connects to the users feelings by saying “AIDS CAN BLOW YOUR HIGH”. The designer does a good job of connecting to users with the contrast of dark colors and the use of red. A needle stretched across the image displays the needle with blood dripping off the end. The blood is used to represent the used needle. The image is put together well, connecting deeply to emotional aspects in many different ways. As for the second image, it draws in the viewers and makes the consequences look worse. The image uses people rather than just a needle. Both pictures are strong in raising awareness against the sharing of dirty needles; especially targeting drug users. When someone looks at either image, they can see the terrible risk of HIV/AIDS when users share the same (dirty) needles. Dark, deep colors such as the three used in both images, give the vibe of negative outcomes. Even after displaying the repercussions that come from sharing, it is still important to spread awareness against the issue.
Many different sensory properties compose the artwork. There is a soft light that seems very natural coming off the boy’s face. The light shines at the boy’s face at an elevated level, as if he were outside on a hot afternoon with the sun overhead. There is a wide range of tones from very bright, in the reflection off the boys cheeks to very dark in the skin of the boys face. Muniz does an excellent job using shadows to provide a feeling of depth and adding curves to the boys body and face. The shape of the boy is positive, but the background is not defined, allowing a negative shape or void in the picture. Although there is no actually texture on the photograph the texture from the original work of art is apparent. The use of sugar gives off a hazy effect preventing the photo from having a clear focus.
The similar controversial natures of Fury’s Kissing Doesn’t Kill and Manuel Ramos Otero’s “Nobility of Blood” suggest that perhaps their intended audiences may have shared characteristics as well. Because Kissing Doesn’t Kill is a piece of poster art, it was displayed out in the public, instead of a museum or convention like usual pieces of art. The poster was plastered in large sizes to the sides of public transportation buses, billboards, and even mass mailings. People of all kinds of backgrounds came across the artwork, whether they wanted to or not. However, since the point of activist artwork like this is to create social change, the effect of this artwork on its viewers is the main focus. To people who agreed with the statements on the
Having such an image before our eyes, often we fail to recognize the message it is trying to display from a certain point of view. Through Clark’s statement, it is evident that a photograph holds a graphic message, which mirrors the representation of our way of thinking with the world sights, which therefore engages other
One important scene in the film ‘The Age of Aids’ is “Port Au Prince, Haiti”. In this scene it outlines the conditions in Haiti, which were very poor and it turn left the city defenseless against the new disease. In 70’s and 80’s the disease began to be seen by doctors and priests who were being sought after to cure a unseen disease which left the people with the “look of death, [making them] so skinny you could see their bones”. The scene then goes on to take a look at one of the first HIV clinics in Port Au Prince, which was opened in the roughest parts of town. One of the surprising things that this clinic found when they were looking at the patients coming in was that the mean they were analyzing had more contact with women then they had with men. This was extremely interesting because this was completely different from what the pattern of the disease had been in the US. The doctors believed this was because homosexual males had been coming into Haiti as tourists and where having sex with locals, who in comparison didn’t call themselves homosexuals because even though they had been having sex with men, the number of women they were having sex with greatly outnumbered the men. This was extremely important because it allowed people to open their eyes, and realize that this was not a homosexual disease, that anyone could get the disease. And that’s exactly what happened within the Haitian community. Within three years the disease had spread across the entire island effects all aspects of society. This scene was effective because it is able to change a viewer with little knowledge of the disease to understand how doctors were able to come to the conclusion that the disease was not in fact a homosexual ...
Art has always been considered the effervescent universal tool of communication. Art does not require a concrete directive . One sculpture,drawing or written creative piece, can evoke a myriad of emotions and meaning . Artistic pieces can sometimes be considered the regurgitation of the artist's internal sanctum. In Richard Hooks graphic painting,Adoption of the Human Race, the effect of the imagery,symbols ,color and emotional content projects a profound unification of a spiritual edict.
People tend to views an image based on how society say it should be they tend to interpret the image on those assumption, but never their own assumptions. Susan Bordo and John Berger writes’ an argumentative essay in relation to how viewing images have an effect on the way we interpret images. Moreover, these arguments come into union to show what society plants into our minds acts itself out when viewing pictures. Both Susan Bordo and John Berger shows that based on assumptions this is what causes us to perceive an image in a certain way. Learning assumption plays into our everyday lives and both authors bring them into reality.
This essay will focus on political and social printmaking in the 1960s onwards and it will show how these artists used printmaking to express political views of their times. Pop Art had emerged five years prior to the 1960’s; the Pop Art movement presented a challenge to traditions of fine art by including imagery from popular culture. It was the visual art movement that characterised a sense of optimism during the post war consumer boom of the 1950's and 1960's. Warhol was the leader of the Pop art movement; he was a major influence for socially conscious art work in the 1960s. Warhol was also a postmodernist artist; he broke down the barrier of high art and low art, much of Warhol’s work went onto address many social/political issues in the 1960s which were produced using the medium of silk screening, although he denied any interest in politics, Warhol did create silkscreen prints Red Race Riots, of 1963 (fig 9), which were based on photographs of the civil rights protesters in Birmingham, and he also created The electric chair, of 1971 (fig 10) which is a haunting image of the execution chamber at Sing Sing. Over the next decade, he repeatedly returned to the subject of the chair, reflecting on the political controversy surrounding the death penalty in America in the 1960s. Warhol presented the chair as a brutal reduction of a life to nothingness, the image of an unoccupied electric chair in an empty execution chamber became a poignant metaphor for death. Warhol strived to communicate the true feeling which is aroused by this terrifying instrument of death.
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
My chosen methodology for analysis is semiology, Rose (2001) argues semiology confronts the problem of how images make meanings directly. It is not simply descriptive, as compositional interpretation does not appear to be, nor does it rely on quantitative estimations of significance, as content analysis at some level has to. Instead, semiology offers a wide range of analytical tools for depicting an image apart and tracing how it works in relation to broader systems of meaning. A semiological analysis entails the implementation of highly refined set of concepts, which construct detailed accounts of the particular ways the meanings of an image are produced through that image.
Description: The piece shows three people with the letter x in all of there bodys. The piece reads ignorance = fear, silence = death, fight aids, act up. Haring lived with aids and later died from it. This is very much a social and cultural topic and the time in which he created this art. He was raising awareness for aids and helping to protect
In this compare and contrast essay you will read about the differences and similarities in Alice through the looking glass and Hidden Figures. You will read about the conflict in each movie. Also, you will learn about the settings in each of the movies. The final thing you will read about is the theme in each movies how they are the same and how they are different. Keep reading to find out how these two different movies can have thing in common. For example the conflicts of the book are very different, but the conflict has one thing that is in common for both the books.
Having realized art as a structured cultural phenomenon, and having emptied its direct and apparent meaning, it is possible to identify all its possible significations. Interestingly enough, I find that art reveals many diametrically opposed significations: expression and oppression, bias and acceptance, individual and society, creativity and confinement, and freedom and convention, among others. Art signifies the de-politicization of our culture, for even the most political of pieces cease to cause a stir among the masses.
Analyze the Illustrations: Challenge the essay. Use the images to help clarify the writer 's points and to see what they might have missed.
"A picture can paint a thousand words." I found the one picture in my mind that does paint a thousand words and more. It was a couple of weeks ago when I saw this picture in the writing center; the writing center is part of State College. The beautiful colors caught my eye. I was so enchanted by the painting, I lost the group I was with. When I heard about the observation essay, where we have to write about a person or thing in the city that catches your eye. I knew right away that I wanted to write about the painting. I don’t know why, but I felt that the painting was describing the way I felt at that moment.
The image and the articles show some differences with in similarities on the uses of pathos. The photographer uses pathos as a fear in order to warn people not to eat fast-food. However, author uses pathos as empathy over the poor people who have been affected with obesity and as an encouragement and motivation to people who want to lose weight and get healthier. Overall, the photographer and the author use the use of appeal in different way to send the same messages.