Comparing Two Arguments To Legalize Prostitution

648 Words2 Pages

Prostitution is one of the world’s largest criminal trades. The exploitation of women, men, and even children happen all over the world. The legalization of prostitution has been a recurring and controversial debate for decades. Many people believe that legalizing prostitution has greater benefits to the prostitutes in the system, while others disagree and argue it needs to stay an illegal crime. Both arguments could be proven when provided enough efficient evidence. In the case of the two articles written by Rachel Moran and Holmes, Satterberg, and Boyer, there are weak and strong points to the arguments. After analyzing each argument and the evidence provided, Moran’s argument is the better argument, providing better evidence and clearer warrants. …show more content…

Moran argues that legalizing prostitution would allow prostitutes to seek help if abused or assaulted on the job. If free to claim themselves as prostitutes, they can seek help to remove themselves from the degrading system without being harassed or arrested. As Moran states, there are some prostitutes in the business that consider themselves “sex workers” and they are in the business consensually, but the majority of prostitutes are stuck in the business with no way out. Holmes, Satterberg, and Boyer argue that legalizing prostitution would only cause further harm to the victims in the system. Legalizing prostitution would further the exploitation of the prostitutes in the system. Pimps, brothels, and Johns would only be more encouraged to sell and buy the prostitutes. In the article it says 90% of prostitutes were pimped, which is one of the biggest causes of harm. If it was legalized, pimps would only hold a tighter control and demand more from the prostitutes than

Open Document