Comparing Tories and the Whigs in 18th Century Politics

912 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Political parties in the american revolution

Comparing Tories and the Whigs in 18th Century Politics

It is possible to speak of political parties in the period 1789 to

1830. Indeed political parties existed before 1789 but were further

established at the beginning of this period when they became divided

over certain issues; the monarchy, the war, taxation. The differences

between the two parties became clearer as this period goes on.

Political parties i.e. Tories and Whigs existed from the 1670s when

they were used to describe the views of those for and against the

exclusion of Charles II's catholic brother James II, from legitimate

succession to the throne[1]. The Whigs stressed the institution of

parliament as a necessary brake on royal power; the Tories implied a

defence of the established institutions and in particular, those of

the monarchy. The Whigs were seen to want to limit the power of the

crown as much as possible. So that prerogative was so greatly reduced

that the nation would be a Republic in a sense. While the Tories were

advocators of the crown; "they were fast friends to the House of

Stewart."[2]

The Whigs were identified with the glorious Revolution, the protestant

succession, a limited measure of toleration for Dissent, a more

liberal view of the Church of England, and sympathy for financial and

commercial interests. The Tories were the party of the landed interest

and the high church faction within the Anglican establishment, with

all that that implied by way of hostility towards Dissenters.[3]

Party politics was well established by the 1770s as the well known

lawyer Edmund Burke produced a famous pamphlet titled; Thoughts on the

causes of the prese...

... middle of paper ...

...ower of the monarchy and as the

period goes on the divisions become deeper and clearer. However, there

were a lot of things that were the same as before this period; there

was still a lot of independent ministers in the House of Commons and

the lords and the Whigs and Tories were not totally different, as

members of both parties still regarded themselves as the king's

ministers.

Bibliography

Peter Evans: Political Parties in Britain

J.W.Derry: Politics in the age of Fox, Pitt and Liverpool.

Peter Jupp: article

R.G.Thorne: The History of Parliament: the House of Commons.

Internet: www.dadalos.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Evans.

[2] Evans.

[3] J.W.Derry.

[4] J.W.Derry

[5] www.dadalos.org

[6] Jupp.

[7] R.G.Thorne

Show More
Related

  • Do you agree that the failure of the 1886 Home Rule Bill was due to ‘tactical mistakes’ made by Gladstone?

    616 Words  | 2 Pages

    It could be argued that Gladstone’s failure to unite his party, during a time when their ultimate support and confidence in his leadership was crucial, was a significant tactical error that contributed heavily towards the failure of the 1886 Home Rule Bill. The results of the 1885 general election were to have a significant impact on the political landscape of Britain; despite winning the most seats, the Liberals did not have an overall majority.As Parnell and the Irish Parliamentry Party (IPP) held the balance...

    Read More

  • Bacon's Rebellion, And The Boston Tea Party: An Analysis

    677 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many people know about the Revolutionary war and how the colonists seized their independence from the British. What most do not understand is that there was a series of events that steared the colonists onto the road to independence. They began to think for themselves and started to challenge authority. Coming to the New World, the colonists reached for power and financial opportunity when challenging authority in these three examples: the Witchcraft Trials, Bacon’s Rebellion, and the Boston Tea Party.

    Read More

  • Political Parties in George Washington's Cabinet

    751 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalists were in favor of a strong central government, while the anti-federalists opposed most of their ideas. Over time, the gradual development of political parties resulted in the Democrat and Republican parties we have today. The Whiskey Rebellion and the differences between the Federalists and Antifederalists were a couple of the main causes that led to the rise of political parties in the 1790’s. The conflict between the Antifederalists and the Federalists had a tremendous impact on the formation of political parties. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were both members of President George Washington's Cabinet, but had completely different views on politics.

    Read More

  • Political Parties In The 1790s

    1746 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the 1790s, soon after the ratification of the Constitution, political parties were nonexistent in the USA because President Washington feared they would drive the country apart. However, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, with their rivalling mental models, could not help but spark the division of the United States into the Democratic-Republican and Federalist parties. These parties, the Democratic-Republican wanting a small, local government system and the Federalist wanting a strong, powerful government system, turned citizens against one another and eventually led to the inimical Democratic and Republican parties of today. Hence, the formation of the original political parties in the United States is very significant. Political

    Read More

  • Revolutionary Ideas: Patriots vs. Loyalists

    1124 Words  | 3 Pages

    In early America, there were three factions that developed within the colonies- Loyalists, Patriots, and fence-sitters (neutral). This melting pot of different ideas, goals, and outlooks is what made pre-Revolutionary War America so volatile. These three factions seem easy to identify, Patriots wanted freedom from the crown all together, Loyalists want to stay British, and fence-sitters want to stay out of the political battle all together. However, it goes much farther than that, many different backgrounds and goals drove these people forward. Many did not take up the title of Loyalist or Patriot unless the struggles affected them directly, many more only took sides when it was profitably to them and for some it was because they had no choice in the matter.

    Read More

  • Compare The Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    91 Words  | 1 Pages

    By 1820 differences between the North and South grew eminent. The majority of the northern states were rapidly industrializing and anti-slavery. The opposite was true for most Southern states, which were pro-slavery and had more agriculture and plantations than factories and industry. Between 1820 and 1861 many compromises were introduced to America in order to reduce sectional tensions between the North and South. Compromises such as the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854 were ineffective in diffusing sectional tensions leading up to the Civil War.

    Read More

  • The Canadian Governing System is not Fair or Democratic

    1396 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e a lot of parties are going to be running for office. However, for the fringe parties this creates a major advantage for them. With the load of political parties in the House of Commons, there would be a wider range of interests for people but there would be a lot of indecision and coalitions.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Second Party System Of The Jacksonian Parties

    1094 Words  | 3 Pages

    Laborers were in unrest during the 1820’s and 1830’s due to the inhumane conditions they worked and lived in, because many were often non-english speaking immigrants that were immediately forced to fend for themselves, and because machinery was being introduced - the steel that threatened to steal their jobs. Another huge strain that forced people to work was the constant availability of hands; you were replaceable. In short, the unrest among the laborers was caused by the threat of a machine or another person taking your job, and the constant stress of being a foreigner in a hustling town when people constantly turned their backs to you.

    Read More

  • Conservatism: The Most Important Political Ideologies In The 19th Century

    914 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the 19th century, there were many important political ideologies all across the European continent. There was Conservatism, which favored the old or traditional political ideas. The extreme opposite of Conservatism was Liberalism. During this time period, Liberalism was considered any idea that went against the ideas of Conservatism. However, the ideas of Nationalism, possibly the most powerful political ideology of the time, did not fall under Conservatism or Liberalism. Nationalism was its own ideology that happened to be very compatible with Liberalism. Nationalism was the idea that nations should be comprised of people who share common roots and should be under one government; however, the Vienna Settlement directly opposed their ideas. The Austrians saw nationalism as a threat to them because they were comprised of many smaller nations while there were nationalist movements in

    Read More

  • Essay On The Hamiltonian Federalists

    1009 Words  | 3 Pages

    There were two primary political parties that emerged in the United States during the 1790s - the Hamiltonian Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. Each had their own distinct views on the role of the national government, as well as the method in which the Constitution should be interpreted. Due to their differences in opinion in management of the country there were several issues that arose, including the economic plan designed to reboot the country post-war and the nation’s relationship with France and the implications from their revolution.

    Read More

  • Women and Politics in the 17th Century

    1344 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the seventeenth century, there was no authorized political place for women in the social hierarchy scale. Women had entered into a modern age and created their own form of politics in the 1660s where they were able to enforce political power, gain popularity, and become independently wealthy by being a part of the royal court. When King Charles II arrived back in England after ten years in exile, he had formed relationships with various women until the end of his life. Royal mistresses were not only able to have a relationship with King Charles, but also have political influence upon the court and its king. But we can ask ourselves; was this a new form of empowerment or a new form of exploitation of women?

    Read More

  • Politics in the 1870s

    670 Words  | 2 Pages

    Believe it or not, major events occurred in the 1870s. They did not go wild in their cowboy boots and hats riding along on their horses. The American people were expanding west and man was the controversy endless. Come on now, it’s drama, it can be dated back to the B.C. years. Of course the drama was all tied into politics. Politics in the 1870s consisted of changes, first time events, and two elections.

    Read More

  • Unrest and Issues During the Gilded Age

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    Commonly referred to as the Gilded Age, the end of the nineteenth century was a period of social issues and political unrest. Following a period of Reconstruction after the Civil War, the Gilded Age was ridden with problems surrounding the countries recovery. Presidents such as Ulysses Grant and Rutherford Hayes were viewed fraudulent and incompetent leaders for the nation. Meanwhile, Congress was mostly ruled by large enterprises, allowing for little political representation of the masses. Additionally, the nation was plagued by an overwhelming amount of social issues including child labor, immigration, women and minorities, and rapid urbanization. Overpopulation was particularly troublesome for the state of democracy as most voters were

    Read More

  • Politics in the 19th Century

    1167 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the 19th century, the political climate could be closely related to a tooth gritting earthquake or a tremendous volcanic eruption. As Europe transitioned into Romanticism, socialists and classical liberals started rising from all over Europe with many different ideas. In America, slavery and social reforms were a hotbed of debate sparking many controversy’s, one of which almost lead to the secession of South Carolina. No one besides Charles Fourier, Alexis de Tocqueville, and John C. Calhoun represented the potent cocktail of varying social ideas and political theory of the 19th century better. These three were unique in their ideas and have a very impacting legacy.

    Read More

  • Political Developments In The 19th Century

    1145 Words  | 3 Pages

    The era of the Civil War brought a multitude of changes that would impact the lives of all Americans. After the conclusion of what would be the bloodiest war of the 19th century, several constitutional and social developments were brought into effect. Such constitutional developments included the Emancipation Proclamation and the Radical Reconstruction of Andrew Johnson. To a similar extent, the passage of the 15th Amendment guaranteed all African American males the right to vote, regardless of any previous condition of servitude. However, in spite of many positive constitutional developments that arose during this era, a combination of legal developments such as Black Codes and Poll taxes, combined with negative social developments such as the Rise of the Ku Klux Klan and White Supremacy resulted in an unstable

    Read More

More about Comparing Tories and the Whigs in 18th Century Politics

Open Document