Comparing The Shoemaker And The Tea Party

1165 Words3 Pages

Alfred F. Young’s The Shoemaker and the Tea Party illustrates the life of George Robert Twelves Hewes, a lowly shoemaker in Boston, and his transformation into a citizen active in the revolutionary events of his time. Young uses Hewes’ transformation to illustrate what liberty and freedom meant for the ordinary Bostonian during the revolutionary period, and emphasizes how the definition of freedom was an enigma even as the colonial rebels fought for their liberation from England. As the events of the revolution went underway, it brought an opportunity for everyone affected by and participating in these events to consider and challenge their own definitions of freedom as their new identity as Americans emerged. Hewes was directly impacted by …show more content…

As Hewes was “moved to act by personal experience that he shared with… other plebian Bostonians”, the “unwarrantable sufferings” that Britain inflicted on its American citizens, so many others felt the same need to protect themselves from the British government. Hewes was moved to action and was “politicized...by things that happened to him, that he saw, or that happened to people he knew”. The politicization of Hewes as well as of many of the Boston’s lower classes indicated a growing resentment within the public about their treatment under the crown. Many citizens of Boston abhorred the British government’s violation of their colonialist rights during the time of the Stamp Act and were “excited with an inextinguishable desire to aid in chastising them.” The fact that the famously rebellious Tea Party act was a “quasi-military action, the boldest and most dangerous in Boston up to that time” exemplifies the frustrations of Bostonians and their need to fight for their rights through massive demonstrations to get the attention of Britain. This feeling obligation of many Bostonians to fight to protect themselves from the British government suggests that there was an underlying idea among Americans that freedom meant that all humans have inherent rights and these rights need to be protected by their

Open Document