1.) Compare and Contrast the Persian War and the Peloponnesian War? Focus on answering the following questions: What led to the beginning of each war? Who were the major parties involved on either side of each of the conflict? At the conclusion of each war, who was victorious? Most importantly, how were the parties involved impacted immediately after each conflict? Why is each war important in the development of Ancient Greek history?
The Persian War was a war between the Greeks and the Persians. Even though the Greeks were still not united they fought to defend each territory that was theirs. The Peloponnesian war was a war among the Greek city states. That is the difference among the two; one was fought against an enemy who attacked the Greece land and the other was fought among the Greeks themselves. The Persian War begun because the Greeks made a military rebellion in Asia Minor which caused the Persians to face more conflicts themselves. This was known as the Ionian Revolt. After the Ionian Revolt, the Persians more than ever wanted to take over Greece Eventually leading to the Persian War. This was the reason why the Persian war began, basically of revenge. The major parties involved in the conflict of this war were the Persians and the Greek city states.
…show more content…
The Persians lost to the Athenians.
The Greeks were able to continue living the way they had done so. Themistocles, though, let his ambitions overpower him. This then resulted in a rage of the assembly. He was banned from Greece and forced to flee to the country he once had fought, Persia. There he became a Persian, being able to speak Greece and also serving as one of the administrators for the Persian king. The Persian war has a significant importance because if they would have lost this war then the values that we know even till today would have been lost. They extraordinary values gave us what is known to be the Classical
Age. The Peloponnesian war was a war in where the Greek city states fought among each other. They fought for resource and power but most importantly they fought for the democratic reforms of Cleisthenes, which basically was the reason this war was led by. The two major parties involved in this specific war was the Athenians and the Spartans. At the end of the war the Spartans were the victorious of this war with the help of the Persians. Sparta was then considered the number one city-state Greece had although they didn’t last for long. Sparta’s ambition in the central and northern Greece, Asia Minor, and Sicily brought them to difficult conflicts which eventually lead to the Corinthians war. The Peloponnesian war was important for the development of Ancient history because the Spartans weekend the Athenians leaving them with little power. This will eventually open the door for the Macedonians to come and attack the Athenians again but since they were already weak enough they no longer were able to resist. They ultimately became dominated by the Macedonians. 2.) Theater was important to Ancient Greek Civilization. Please provide 3 reasons why this artform was central to the Greeks. Focus on the festivals, the playwrights, the theatrical conventions of the time, and the various purposes for theater in Ancient Greece. The ancient Greek theatre was important to Greece because they were like rituals performed to honor their god of Dionysus, the god of wine and fertility. These festivals were led by drunk men dressed in goat skin. They would compete with another tribe and the best would win at the end. There were 4 different festivals that would be celebrated according to the seasons. Some festivals would actually contain athletic competition known as the Olympic Games, which would be held in the honor of Zeus. Although they had few festivals they only allowed the plays to be presented in one festival which was the City of Dionysia festival. It is said to believe that the traditions come from Egyptian pageants honoring Osiris. Actors, directors and dramatist were all the same person in Greek festivals. Later it evolved to 3 people used in one play. There would be no movement. Thespis was the name of the 1st actor ever. He came in and added movement as well as mask, make up and costumes. Theatre was not only used for entertaining though. It was also used to educate the public with news because there was no other way as well as to teach the audience etiquette, values attitude, etc. it also Provided income for those play writers who would dedicate and make a living to bringing out the information and entertainment to the people. Plays were held when there was a special occasion or religious festivals with the help of the rich who strongly believed it was their duty to support the plays. There were 3 types of plays in the theatre of Greece. These were Satyr plays, comedies and tragedy. The most important among all 3 was Tragedy. The first comedies mocked men in power for their vanity and foolishness. Aristophanes was the first one to master comedy plays. Menander later wrote comedies about people and made his plays more like sit-coms. Satyr plays were plays that would take place in between the acts of tragedy. Then lastly tragedy had a lot to do with themes of love, loss, pride abuse of power and the fraught relationship between men and gods. Usually the main character who makes the play alive commits some type of crime without realizing it. The 3 playwrights of this type were Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides. Mask and costumes were an important part of the whole act the actors had to put together. Masks would work as amplifiers making the actors words clearer for the audience to understand costumes also were important because it gave the audience the idea to recognize the actor by social class or gender. The males would also wear prosterneda which would basically give them the image of breast since women were not allowed to participate in plays until later on in the years. Some of the plays were Oedipus by Sophocles which is known as probably the best known classical drama. Another would be The Oresteia by Aeschylus. Then there were those plays named Prometheus Bound by Aeschylus, Antigone by Sophocles, and Medea by Euripedes. Plays have become a big part of society even today. 3.) Select either the Sumerian OR the Egyptian civilization and by using the six characteristics of civilized societies discussed in Chapter 1, please explain how your selected civilization fulfilled these six characteristics. The Sumerian is the oldest civilization known in history. It is said that it is the first civilization that ever existed. This civilization started 3,500 BC and is now known as southern Iraq. These extraordinary people who only lived for survival created a base for what we have become today. But how did these brilliant minds work together to build the urban civilization they created? That is something worth covering today. I will be explaining how the Sumerians fulfilled the 6 characteristics of civilized societies. These include the form of urban life, system of government, development of social class, and production of goods by tools and spec ialized skills leading to manufacturing and trade, written communication allowing perpetuation of information and lastly the religious beliefs. We don’t really have many records that tell us exactly how it happened but there is one thing that is probably one of the oldest piece of literature found, the Epic of Gilgamesh. These poems are said to be the earliest living document. These pieces of art have helped us uncover what we know today. Why did they urbanize a certain area if back then they had to go hunt and move around food? The Sumerian found an important crop that would change history, wheat. They figured that they could urbanize that area and survive. They became an agriculture civilization. The Sumerian settled the land between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. They knew the land there was very flat so they had to build dikes and canals so they could have water to irrigate their crops. In the Sumerian land priest governed. They controlled and administered economic as well as religious affairs. Later on it became to where on person would rule and be considered a representative of God on earth but unlike other gods it never became to him being the center of attention or divine. The Sumerian was thought to be made up of not 3 but actually 4 social classes. They were the nobles, which were slaves, clients and commoners. Then came priests, warriors, and the wealthy, who were families that owed a lot of land. The Sumerian used the rivers to their advantage, trade. They also had created boats and that’s how they were able to transport good and trade them to different parts of the land. They also used mud brick walls and dry stone foundations to make their homes. They also came up with different tools such as hammers, nails, hoes, knives, swords, etc. These tools were part of the amazing creativity and now we use them everywhere. All of what the Sumerians have done has been incredibly astonishing but probably the most important of all will be the written communications that they left behind. This was known as the cuneiform, their system of writing. This eventually lead to what now today is how we modern society communicate. Without writing there would be no history. Of course they did not develop the English words that we now speak but they had what stated it of which were like signs or pictographs embedded in stones. The cuneiform system was a very fast and efficient way for the Sumerian to store information. This is what made everything possible for them when it comes to the trade and record keeping. Among these stones was The Epic of Gilgamesh. Last but not least is their Polytheistic Religion. They believed their god was adoration to nature, sky and earth, sun and moon, lightning and storm. This is why everyone would go to the temple to worship these different gods. The names of their gods where Anu the god of the skies, Nanna the god of the moon and Abu the god of vegetation. They strongly believed that of they would not worship these gods then they will bring ruin upon themselves for they will no longer provide for them. Different rituals, food sacrifices where made in these temples, where the gods were kept, daily. Religion for the Sumerians was the most important thing on top of surviving for them. If they didn’t worship their gods they would not survive, is what they believed. We thank the Sumerians for all the history they have left us with today. If it were not for them our civilizations would have simply not been the same as what it is today.
In the later cases of Corinth and Megara, it was Athens unwillingness to agree on independence that triggered the Peloponnesian War. In effect, I believe that Athens had helped to end a war, onto to start another whilst in pursuit of her personal desire for imperialism.
The Persian War stemmed from the Ionian Revolt which began in 499 BC. The Ionians became a part of the Persian Empire in 546 BC, but after many years desired to break away from this forced bond. Therefore, the Ionians sought help from the mainland Greeks. The Athenians and Eretrians responded by sending ships, but eventually became more involved. "What began as a relatively minor involvement in the revolt became more serious when the Athenian and Eretrian forces aided in a surprise attack on Sardis, during which the city was set afire" (Demand 1996, 184). Although the Ionian revolt was ultimately unsuccessful, it sparked the anger of Darius, the King of Persia, that the Athenians dared to interfere with his vast empire. Herodotus writes he was so angry that he "ordered one of his servants to say to him three times every day before dinner, 'Sire, remember the Athenians" (Hdt. 5.105.2). Whether Darius really said this is questionable, but it is clear that either to exact venge...
... one another until they were no more. From the Persian War to the Peloponnesian the two states had changed a lot of the years. Starting from their greatest alliance yet first moment of subtle rivalry, the Persian War. Although they were indistinctly competing against one another, without each other they could not have dominated. Then there were the two blows to the peace treaty. The first blow being the Athenian assistance in the battle between Corinth and Corycra. The second blow being the idea to burn Corinth’s town down. Although these were remarkable mistakes the Athenians saw nothing wrong with them. Lastly, was the war. In 431 B.C. the Peloponnesian War broke out between the two allies, after all they had been through, their alliance was over. War was bound to happen, although they lived in tranquility for so long, one or the other was destined to break out.
The Peloponnesian War and the Decline of Leadership in Athens Thucydides set out to narrate the events of what he believed would be a great war—one requiring great power amassed on both sides and great states to carry out. Greatness, for Thucydides, was measured most fundamentally in capital and military strength, but his history delves into almost every aspect of the war, including, quite prominently, its leaders. In Athens especially, leadership was vital to the war effort because the city’s leaders were chosen by its people and thus, both shaped Athens and reflected its character during their lifetimes. The leaders themselves, however, are vastly different in their abilities and their effects on the city. Thucydides featured both Pericles and Alcibiades prominently in his history, and each had a distinct place in the evolution of Athenian empire and the war it sparked between Athens and Sparta.
The main reason that the Greeks were able to win the Second Greco-Persian War was the fact that their victory on the sea dealt a crippling blow to the land army. The Greeks owe their naval success to a man named Themistocles. If it had not been for him then Athens would have not used some newly found silver to build 200 new ships for their navy. These ships were later used in the war against the Persians. The two forces were working in unison and they were dependent upon each other for victory. The Persian naval forces were there in order to protect the flank of the army's advance. If the Persian navy were not present then the Greeks would have been able to get on ships and sail to a spot behind the Persian lines and outflank them. They also delivered supplies to the armies that were necessary for its survival.
To my understanding of the reading, the Persian war was a result of the tyrant of Miletus, Histiaeus, backstabbing king Darius of Persia. Histiaeus was supposed to conquer Sardinia and place them under the control of Persia but instead he planned of claiming Sardinia for himself. Histiaeus writes a
Of all the history of the Ancient Greece, there were two events that showed really well how disunity among the Greeks highly contributed to its downfall, which were the Peloponnesian War and Successors’ War. Interestingly, both wars occurred after a unity and followed by a unity that was carried out by “outsiders”. This may have actually shown that the Greeks had never learned from their past
The Peloponnesian War (431-404 B.C.) was a conflict between the Athenian Empire and the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta that resulted in the end of the Golden Age of Athens. The events of the war were catalogued by the ancient historian Thucydides in The History of the Peloponnesian War. Thucydides’ writings showed the ancient Greek belief that there is a parallel between the city-state and the character of its citizens; in order for the city-state to be successful, its citizens must be virtuous. Thucydides did not believe that the true cause of the Peloponnesian War were the immediate policies of the Athenian Empire against the city-states in the Peloponnesian League but rather the fundamental differences in the character of the two city-states
The book written by Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War, contains two controversial debates between distinguished speakers of Athens. The two corresponding sides produce convincing arguments which can be taken as if produced as an honest opinion or out of self-interest. The two debates must be analyzed separately in order to conclude which one and which side was speaking out of honest opinion or self-interest, as well as which speakers are similar to each other in their approach to the situation.
The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica. "Peloponnesian War (ancient Greek History)."Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, 24 Dec. 2013. Web. 05 Apr. 2014
Thucydides, Dent, J. M., & Dutton, E. P. (1910). The Peloponnesian War. London & New
The roots of the Peloponnesian war can be traced long before 431 BCE, when it officially started. It can be traced back to as early as the Persian Wars, where the Athenians had found their home burned by the hands of the Persians. That disaster left the Athenians with no home and no sanctuary. Even though that was a defeated battle amidst a victorious war, they still had reason to believe that the Persians will come back for more. Apprehensive at the thought of having their city burned yet another time, the Athenians knew they had to do something. Naturally, they chose to get help. Gathering up the neighboring city-states around them, the Athenians formed the Delian League; an alliance working directly to defend the whole of Greece from Persian attacks (Kagan 8). In the beginning, this worked out well; everybody got their say on what went on in the league, and everybody was satisfied. However, the Athenians saw that if they were to take more power, the members of the league would not be strong enough to resist. Therefore, that was exactly what they did; they took more and more power until what was the Delian League became the Athenian Empire (Kagan 8). As they grew even more powerful and wealthy, their neighbors of Sparta and the Peloponnesian League, Sparta's alliance, could not help but notice (Kagan 13). In 431 BCE, lighted b...
The causes of the Peloponnesian War proved to be too great between the tension-filled stubborn Greek city-states of Athens and Sparta. As Thucydides says in Karl Walling’s article, “Never had so many human beings been exiled, or so much human blood been shed” (4). The three phases of the war, which again, are the Archidamian war, the Sicilian Expedition and the Decelean war, show the events that followed the causes of the war, while also showing the forthcoming detrimental effects that eventually consumed both Athens and eventually Sparta effectively reshaping Greece.
The Peloponnesian War is the conflict between the pelopoponesians league led by Sparta and the Delian league, led by Athens. Much of our knowledge on the causes and events of the Peloponnesian War, depends on the Athenian Thucydides 460-400 BC, writer of the History of the Peloponessian War. He servd as an Athenian commander in Northern Greece during the early years of the war until the assembly exiled him as he lost an outpost to the enemy. During this exile, he was able to interview witnesses on both sides of the conflicted. Unlike Heredotus he concentrated on contemporary history and presented his account of the war in an annalistic framework that only occasionally diverts from chronological order. In his account, he discuses the precursors to the war, including the 30 years truce and revolutions, such as the stasis in Corcyra. When looking at wars, the primary focus is normally the fighting itself, such as what we see for World War II. However, it is important to look at the anatomy of war, meaning what effect the war has on the people who are experiencing it first hand, and the consquences that the conflict has on the rest of the world. Therefore in this essay I shall discuss, drawing directly from Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War, how the civilians reacted to the war, their involvement and socio economic factors. Furthermore, the first section of my essay shall focus on the direct effect of war on the people, regarding the plague, and violence and hopelessness that was experienced. Then I shall go on to discuss more general effects of the war and how it affected the Greek world, discussing the social and economic losses that occurred such as the cost of the war in attica, the coup d’etat that occurred in gove...
Beginning in 492 B.C., a series of wars erupted, appropriately entitled the Persian Wars, which lasted around thirteen years. Because of the constant battles between the Persians, led by Xerxes, and Greece, both civilization started growing weaker and weaker. When the wars ended, the Greeks were successful at defeating the Persians. However, being in a weakened state caused the Greek city- states (mainly Athens against Sparta) to fight amongst themselves in order to have more influence over the rest of the city-states. This type of war was termed the Peloponnesian War and continued from 431B.C. to 404 B.C. (History of Greece:The Golden Age of Greece) and