The connect between time, memory, and place.
Many people have different perspective of toward time, memory and place. In the short stories from Eiseley, “The Naturalist” and from E.B White, “Once More to the Lake”, both share different attitudes toward time, memory, place. Where, in Eiseley story, has a negative attitude and whereas, E.B. White story has a more positive attitude.
Firstly, Eiseley story attitude toward time is more negative unlike E.B. White story, which is more positive. For example, in the story “The Naturalist” by Eiseley, it states “In sixty years the house and street had rotted out of my mind” (Eiseley 5). Also, in the story “Once More to the Lake”, it states “It was the arrival of this fly that convinced me beyond any doubt that everything was as it always had been, that the years were a mirage and there had been no years” (White 2). Therefore, in the story “The Naturalist” the attitude towards time is more negative, because the character in the story says that throughout time everything is changed. Whereas, in the story “Once More to the Lake”, the character feels very happy that even throughout the years that not much has changed. To summarize, one person could
…show more content…
view time as a good thing, which means that even with time not much would change and another person could view that it is less good. Because, throughout the years things change and it is not how the person imagine it to be. Furthermore, in both stories the attitude toward memory is slightly both positive.
For example, in the story “The Naturalist” by Eiseley, it states “It was from this tree that his memories, which are my memories, let away into the world” (Eiseley 4). Also, in the story “Once More to the Lake” by E.B. White. It states, “As I kept remembering all this, that those times and those summers had been infinitely precious and worth saving” (White 3). Thus, in both stories the characters have good memories from when they grew up and both remember their father. The attitude toward memories are both positive, because it is good memories and not bad ones. To summarize, in both stories the authors have positive attitude toward memories, because in both stories both characters has good
memories. Thirdly, in both stories the attitudes toward place are fairly positive. For example, in the story “The Naturalist” by Eiseley, it states “There was more than an animal’s attachment to a place” (Eiseley 5). Also, in the story “Once More to the Lake” by E.B. White, it states “On the journey over to the lake I began to wonder what it would be like” (White 1). Therefore, both characters in both stories were drawn by a specific place that they were curious about if it had changed or not. In the story “Once More to the Lake”, the place has not change, but in the story “The Naturalist”, the place has change. To summarize, the attitude towards the stories are positive because both were drawn to a specific place. To conclude, both authors from the two stories have similar attitude toward time, memory, and place, because in the two stories it is mostly good outcome that relates to it. Also, a place would bring back old memories and would get a person to wonder how have time change the place.
In the essay “Once More to the Lake,” E.B. White, uses diction and syntax to reveal the main character’s attitude towards the lake in Maine. He has an uncertain attitude towards the lake throughout the essay because he is unsure of who he is between him and his son. On the ride there White, pondering, remembering old memories, keeps wondering if the lake is going to be the same warm place as it was when he was a kid. The lake is not just an ordinary lake to White, it’s a holy spot, a spot where he grew up every summer. “I wondered how time would have marred this unique, this holy spot-the coves and streams, the hills that the sun set behind, the camps and the paths behind the camps” (29). White’s diction and syntax
The past dictates who we are in a current moment, and affects who we might become in the future. Every decision people make in lives has an influence on future, regardless of how minimal or large it is. Some decisions people decide to make can have dire consequences that will follow them for the rest of the life. Moreover, even though if someone would want to leave any memories from past behind, however it will always be by his side. Specific memories will urge emotional responses that bring mind back to the past and person have no choose but to relieve those emotions and memories again. Nonetheless, certain events change people and make them who they are, but at the same time, some wrong choices made past haunts us. This essay will discuss the role of the past in novel Maestro, that was written by Australian author Peter Goldsworthy in 1989 and also in Tan Shaun's story Stick Figures which was included in book called "Tales from outer suburbia" and published in 2008.
Authors often use details that evoke a response in readers to produce an effective description. Their aim is not simply to tell readers what something looks like but to show them. Katherine Anne Porter’s “The Grave” and E.B. White’s “Once More to the Lake” are essays that use subjective language to illustrate the principles of effective description. Porter’s “The Grave” describes a childish afternoon of rabbit hunting that brings death close enough to be seen and understood, while White’s “Once More tot he Lake” is a classic essay of persona; reminiscence in which he recreates the lakeside camp he visited with his son.
E.B. White's essay, Once More to the Lake demonstrate his own security in consistency from growing up on into adulthood. White begins to set the stage mid way through the first paragraph, mentioning that he and his father "returned [to the lake] summer after summer- always on August 1 for one month" followed up by the fact that "has since become a salt-water man," longing to one day return to the "holy spot." This trip back to the lake brings back a great deal of memories, as if there "[had] been no passage of time." It is on this trip that White begins to realize that his son seems to possess the same enthusiasm that he did when White was a boy. To White, all of this is a shock because now his role is now reversed from a flamboyant and energized child to an observational parent, as he remembered his father.
When the topic of childhood memory pops up in a conversation the listeners would think the story teller is telling the truth right? Well, what if I said that the people telling the stories might not even know if they aren’t? When these stories are told most don’t realize the little bit of memory actually involved. So how much or it is true and how much it came from another inaccurate place? Where could something like that come from? Were Jennette Walls’ memories real? Does this affect you or is it not a big dilemma? Should these be considered There are several different debates within itself but the main one to focus on is are your memories even your memories?
E. B. White's story "Once More to the Lake" is about a man who revisits a lake from his childhood to discover that his life has lost placidity. The man remembers his childhood as he remembers the lake; peaceful and still. Spending time at the lake as an adult has made the man realize that his life has become unsettling and restless, like the tides of the ocean. Having brought his son to this place of the past with him, the man makes inevitable comparisons between his own son and his childhood self, and between himself as an adult and the way he remembers his father from his childhood perspective. The man's experience at the lake with his son is the moment he discovers his own mortality.
Their memories will give them an ideal live to go towards or a life in which they want to progress from. If an individual chooses to run from the past in which they lived, it is still a component in their life which shaped them to be who it is they became, despite their efforts to repress those memories. Nevertheless, the positive memories of an individual’s past will also shape who they are. Both good and bad memories are able to give an individual a glimpse into their ideal life and a target in which they wish to strive for and memories in which they can aim to prevent from happening once
Yet throughout White’s essay you see how peaceful he keeps the tone the entire time. With the subtle approach White has on the parts of his memories he thoroughly explains to this audience. Look at the melodrama of the storm White uses. While in The Pond the tone is more spiritual and religious. For example in The Pond, Thoreau is using The Pond as a spiritual symbol. Then there is the dominant impression. In both The Ponds and Once More to the Lake they share something. The way they share their views. The views of the memories, environment around them, and the way they felt throughout the entire thing. Once More to the Lake is on the memories surround the lake White has always known of as a boy and that is his dominant
Eiseley’s essay on water is from a reflective stance, connecting past, present, and future by water. He links his own magical experiences to water, by telling of when “…I lay back in the floating position that left my face to the sky, and shoved off” (Eiseley 139) he sets his mind adrift, and “… this sort of curious absorption by water¬¬—the extension of shape by osmosis…” (Eiseley 137) he becomes an embodiment of water. He goes on to articulate his interpretation of being one with nature, geology, history, and archeology, via water. All his reveries are brought about by a view of a stagnant pool on a roof. He not only feels connected to life through water, but he lets us glimpse that water is able to dredge up his past, and stir speculations of his future. He speaks of our current evolutional phase as a waypoint on the path to the future, he writes “…I have seen myself passing by—...
"Once More to the Lake," by E.B. White is a short story in which White recalls his annual summer vacations to the lake, and in turn develops a conflict within himself regarding the static and dynamic characteristics of this lake, and their relation to the changes that White himself is experiencing as he is growing older. When White takes his son to the lake, he comes to the sharp realization that certain aspects of both the lake and himself are different, and with a sense of reminiscence, White takes us from the time his father first took him to the lake, and tells the new story of his most recent visit when he is no longer a boy, but a father, showing his son this "holy place" for the very first time. Throughout the story, White comments on how many of the elements of the lake have changed, and how other things have stayed constant with the passage of time.
Of the lessons of this course, the distinction made between story and situation will be the most important legacy in my writing. I learned a great travel essay cannot be merely its situation: its place, time, and action. It requires a story, the reader’s internal “journey of discovery.” While the importance of establishing home, of balancing summary and scene, and other lessons impacted my writing, this assertion at least in my estimation the core argument of the course.
The title of this piece, “Remembered Morning,” establishes what the speaker describes in the stanzas that follow as memory; this fact implies many themes that accompany works concerning the past: nostalgia, regret, and romanticism, for instance. The title, therefore, provides a lens through which to view the speaker’s observations.
In “Once More to the Lake,” E.B. White expresses a sense of wonder when he revisits a place that has significant memories. Upon revisiting the lake he once knew so well, White realizes that even though things in his life have changed, namely he is now the father returning with his son, the lake still remains the same. Physically being back at the lake, White faces an internal process of comparing his memory of the lake as a child, to his experience with his son. Throughout this reflection, White efficiently uses imagery, repetition, and tone to enhance his essay.
In order to understand the relationship between Roquentin’s “feeling of adventure” and his friend Anny’s idea of a “perfect moment” the defining characteristics of each idea must be discerned. Roquentin explicitly defines the feeling of adventure as being “that of the irreversibility of time.”(pg. 57). Although Roquentin has traveled the world and had many exotic experiences, he does not consider any of them to be adventures because in those moments he was not conscious of his own existence or of the passing of time. By this definition, a true adventure is characterized as beginning the moment in which the adventurer becomes conscious of the passing of each precious moment in time that can never be repeated. Another defining characteristic of Roquentin’s feeling of adventure is the way in which it “comes when it pleases.”(pg. 56). Even though a person may be conscious of their own existence as well as the passing of time, this does not mean that an adventure can be realized because adventures, for Roquentin, seem to be contingent on a certain linkage of moments. To Roquentin, it is unknown what determine...
Important aspects of naturalism are the ideas that people are essentially animals responding to their basic urges without rational thought, and the insignificance of man to others and nature. In The Jungle, Sinclair portrays Jurgis as a man slowly changing into animal as well as a man whose actions are irrelevant to the rest of the corrupt capitalist world of Chicago in order to show the reader the naturalist ideas of the struggles between man and society.