Comparing The Most Dangerous Game And The Bottomless Hole By The Handsome Family

718 Words2 Pages

What makes a good story? Is it a good plot, the different characters, or a sudden change of fate, something so important and drastic that the protagonist is never the same after that? I think that in the story The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell, The Sniper by Liam O’Flaherty and The Bottomless Hole by The Handsome Family are really good stories because of what happened to the main characters. In most short stories, something happens to the protagonist that affects their fate In The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell, Rainsford survives a near-death experience running away from General Zaroff while playing his twisted game of hide and seek. Rainsford starts off the story by saying there are two types of people, hunters and the hunted, he automatically categorizes himself as a hunter. He also states that animals don't have any understandings, but when Rainsford gets trapped on the island, the game he's forced to play turns the tables on him. Rainsford is forced to be the hunted, this experience gives them the viewpoint of the animals he's hunting, and he feels nothing but fear. At the end of the story …show more content…

his life took an unexpected turn when he cut the rope and started to fall, the farmer seem like he didn't believe in things that didn't make sense, he just knows things work, so when he can’t figure out how the hole goes on forever he goes so crazy about it and he leaves his wife and kids behind see if it is bottomless. Even though the farmer forgets his name and has been falling for so long, he continues to believe the fact that the hole has a bottom to it, he even says “But until I hit the bottom I won’t believe it’s

Open Document