Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic reason behind the crusades
Background of the Crusades
Economic reason behind the crusades
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Knights of the Crusades: Hospitallers and the Templars There were two well-known monastic orders that rose from the Holy Wars of the Crusades. These orders were a new type of religious order- a fighting force that remained devoted to Christian values, but fought as soldiers would in the Crusades. They were known as the Knights of the Hospital (or Hospitallers) and Knights of the Temple (Templars). Throughout the Crusading period both orders of knights played a large role in the protection of the Holy Land and its Christian pilgrims. Both orders were in fact a product of the Crusades and became a largely vital element in how they were fought. This essay argues that while the Hospitallers and Templars had similar origins in the Holy Land these …show more content…
The brothers in the Templars were divided into two classes: knights and sergeants.3 They came from “milite aristocracy” and were trained in the arts of war.3 They were not doctors- or devoted to charity like the Hospitallers. The Templars served in elite leadership positions within the order and serviced royal and papal courts.3 Consequently, royal families across Europe (Spain, France, and England) gave the Templars castles and estates which allowed the Templars to become more widespread, accumulate more wealth, and defend …show more content…
Their individual roles in the Crusades had a role in how well they were received by the papacy and nobility of the time. Both orders were dependent on the papacy and nobles for donations and property.2 Where the Hospitallers were an order that provided free charity they did not get many donations until they became a fighting force.4 The Templars expanded as a vital defense towards the Crusading states and had also become religious “fighting monks” and later so financially well-off that nobles found them as appealing as bankers.4 Both orders became vastly wealthy in the long run- and eventually became rivals against one another.3 The Templars had consistent dealings with wealthy families-both of royalty and nobility.3 Many of the Templar Knights were required to give a portion of their land to the order upon joining resulting in many of the Templars sons of wealthy aristocrats.4 The Pope had allowed the Templars special privileges across the Holy Land and they had the support of both religious and secular leaders.4 This and the Templar’s exemplary military strength enabled them to safely collect, store and transport bouillon around Europe as well as their expanse network of treasure houses made them as attractive as bankers to kings and pilgrims across the Holy
The Military Orders, including the Templars and Hospitallers, were created to protect pilgrims on the route to Jerusalem, but grew into ranks of professional soldiers with a great presence in the East, answerable to the Papacy. These orders “grew rapidly and acquired castles at strategic points in the kingdom and northern states. […] They were soon established in Europe as well, they became international organizations, virtually independent, sanctioned and constantly supported by the papacy” (Madden). The Pope possessed, for the first time, a dedicated military force in Europe. These two outcomes indicate the growth of the Church’s power as a result of the First Crusade, and support the proposition that the Papacy intended it as a way for advancing its political and economic position.
Kings often struggled with the Church over power and land, both trying desperately to obtain them, both committing atrocities to hold onto them. Time and time again, the Popes of the postclassical period went to great extremes to secure the Church’s position in the world. Both the Crusades and the Inquisition are examples of this. D...
Among some of the largest conflicts in the world stand the Crusades; a brutal conflict that lasted over 200 years and was debatably one of the largest armed religious conflicts in the history of humankind. Since this is so clearly an event of importance, historians have searched vigorously for the true answer as to why the crusades began. Ultimately, because of accusatory views on both the sides of the Christians and of the Muslims, the two groups grew in such hatred of each other that they began to act in deep discrimination of each other. Moreover, Christian motives seemed to be driven mostly by the capture of Jerusalem, the dark ages of Europe and the common-folks desperation for land, wealth, and a spot in heaven. What seems to be continually
Few, if any, religious conquests were as gruesome and devastating as the Inquisition. Starting in the 13th century, monarchs from all around Europe, with approval from the Popes during their reigns, anointed inquisitors to track down a certain group of he...
Historians do not have access to many documents that elaborate on the Knights Templar, but what they do have access to demonstrates that the Knights Templar, were extremely influential on the Medieval Church. The Knights Templar, a fairly controversial and secretive order, has been greatly misunderstood since the order began in the Middle Ages. Despite the misunderstandings and controversy, the Knights Templar had many good accomplishments; including protecting Christian pilgrims, defending the Church from heresy and blasphemy, and helping oppressed Christians.
God’s Battalions: The Case for the Crusades by Rodney Stark, will cause readers to question much of what they know about the Crusades, the Crusaders themselves, and the formidable Muslim forces they encountered along the way in liberation of the Holy Land. Stark gives compelling reasons for the Crusades, and argues that readers should not be too quick in following the lead of historians who cast the Crusaders in less than positive light. Stark makes his case supported by evidence that vindicates the valiant struggles of the Crusaders who accomplished the task of keeping Christianity alive through troubled times.
The First Crusade from 1095 to 1099 has been seen as a successful crusade. The First Crusaders carefully planned out their attacks to help promote religion throughout the lands. As the First Crusade set the example of what a successful crusade should do, the following crusades failed to maintain control of the Holy Land. Crusades following after the First Crusade weren’t as fortunate with maintaining the Holy Land due united forces of Muslims, lack of organization, and lack of religious focus.
The Knights Templar were the manifestation of a "new chivalry" which united the seemingly incompatible roles of monk and warrior. As the first religious military order, these dedicated men were models for successive orders including the Order of the Hospital of St. John of Jerusalem, later known as the Hospitallers, and the Teutonic Knights of the Hospital of St. Mary, two contemporary, rival brotherhoods. These and other orders, flourishing during the 12th-14th centuries as protectors of the Holy Land, were the first standing troops to be properly trained and commanded in Western Europe since the fall of the Roman Empire (Seward 17). The extraordinary story of the Knights Templar ranges from its humble establishment to a period of extreme prosperity, and, finally, to a tragic, haunting conclusion.
In order for the crusades to begin, the Christians needed to gather an army to travel and fight the forces of Muslims. With all the power being held by monarchies at this time, the church needed to be cleaver in order to gain troops to put their lives on the line. To gain the support of these warriors and dedication of men, Pope Urban II (1088-1099) challenged those morals of men by telling them to grab their weapons and join the holy war to recover the land of Jerusalem. It was not the challenge that convinced men to take part in this war. The promise of “immediate remission of sins” attracted the men to stand up for their religion and beliefs while at the same time, promising them a trip to heaven when life comes to an end. With this statement, men instantly prepared for battle which in a very short period of time gave the church power which has been held by the monarchies. Men of rich and poor prepared for battle, some wearing ...
Contrary to many commonly held notions about the first crusade, in his book, The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading, Jonathan Riley-Smith sets out to explain how the idea of crusading thought evolved in the first crusade. In his book, Riley-Smith sets out five main arguments to show how these ideas of crusading evolved. Firstly, he argues that Pope Urban’s original message was conventional, secondly that a more positive reaction was drawn from the laity (due to the ideas surrounding Jerusalem), thirdly, that the original message of crusading had changed because of the horrible experiences of the first crusaders, fourth, that due to these experiences the crusaders developed their own concept of what a crusade was, and lastly, that these ideas were refined by (religious) writers and turned into an acceptable form of theology. Riley-Smith makes excellent points about the crusade; however, before one can delve directly into his argument, one must first understand the background surrounding the rise of the first crusade.
Knights associated in groups which they called orders. They vowed loyalty to the king they fought under and formed military org...
The crusades in the middle ages were a long-lasting series of vigorous wars between Christians and Muslims over the Holy Land, Jerusalem. The crusades lasted for almost two hundred years. They began in 1099 and approximately ended in 1291. (What were the motives, and causes of these gruesome wars?) is the first question one might ask. To properly answer this question, I am about to analyze the first four crusades that had began in 1099 and ended in 1212.
With all the events which were occurring in the world, Urban had successfully chosen to launch the crusade at a time when the Christian West was ready to put a stop to the fighting in the East by eliminating all opposition to the Christians. It was also the perfect time for the Pope’s message of ‘guiltless, meritorious violence’. To an audience bred on fighting but fearful of hell the promise of an Indulgence was irresistible.
How did the Crusades affect the Christians, Muslims, and Jews? The crusades impacted them all greatly for they were all a key part of the Crusades. Occasionally A religion may get a positive consequence but most of the time it was a negative one. Why did they all want Jerusalem? They all wanted it because it had a religious value to them. For the Jews, it was their spiritual city where the great temple once stood. For the Christians, it was where Jesus was crucified and rose from the dead. Last but not least for the Muslims it was where Muhammad rose to heaven during the night journey.
For a period stretching up to two centuries, various powers come together to intensify the struggle to take over the Holy Land. These included the aspiration of Popes to gain Rome’s "Spiritually consecrated canonical role" and the business ambition of Italian traders. Christian and Muslim leaders came to the realization that the plan of Holy War could be harnessed to vindicate programs of solidarity and military action, even to expedite the enforcement of autocratic governments. This way, the crusaders war sought to shape and direct violence. Essentially, this ended up serving the ruling class. Those involved in the fight for running of the Holy Land truly believed that their activities were entangled with the divine purposes. Popes Innocent III together with Urban II advocated for crusades to stamp their power, though also hoping to assist the Christians navigate their way to salvation. (Asbridge, 2010)