Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of the pope
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The feud between King Philip IV of France and Pope Boniface VIII represented a time in medieval Europe as nations sought to consolidate power under the monarch of the country. However, Pope Boniface VIII opposed this change in Europe, instead trying to maintain the great influence the papacy had reached under the rule of Pope Innocent III almost 100 years before. Another factor in the feud were the constant disputes between France and England, which required a large amount of money to fund. King Philip IV helped pay for these wars by taxing the clergy of France, which usually required the consent of the pope. In a display of power, Pope Boniface VIII released the bull Clericis Laicos, which gave the pope the power to excommunicate any monarch who taxes his clergy with the pope’s consent. …show more content…
Unfortunately for Pope Boniface, in King Philip’s efforts to consolidate France, he refused the clergy from any ability to administer law. Therefore, Clericis Laicos had little effect in France. After a few back and forth disputes between France and Rome, Pope Boniface sought to weaken France by proclaiming Albert I and the Holy Roman Empire supreme over all other nations in Europe. He followed this act up with the papal bull Unam Sanctam.
Boniface claimed that the Catholic Church is a requirement to achieve salvation, and that the pope must be the head of the Church. However, all people must submit to the Church to reach salvation, even monarchs. I find these claims unreasonable, because they seem to be an attempt to force the monarchs of Europe to realize the Church’s power by weakening their own. Naturally, King Philip, who already disliked the pope from their feuds, would be justified to ignore the bull, because it would have forced him to weaken his power and submit to the pope, exactly what he had tried to avoid during the entire feud. King Philip IV’s rebuttal to Unam Sanctam earned him a excommunication from Boniface. Instead, King Philip brought up twenty-nine accusations against Pope Boniface, which would eventually led to his untimely death. The issues between France and Rome also caused problems in England, where King Henry II struggled against Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury in an attempt to avoid having to submit to the pope’s authority. Becket claimed that the clergy could not be tried by the laws of England, only through the
Church. This mirrors Boniface’s claim that the clergy is free from taxation from monarchs. As Becket fell out of favor in King Henry’s court, he was eventually forced into exile. When he returned to England, he immediately excommunicated bishops that had aiding King Henry. This angered the king so much that four knights went out to murder Becket. As was the case with the dispute between Philip IV and Boniface VIII, the feud between Henry II and Becket escalated from small disputes over the power that the Church should have over the clergy and over the monarchs. Unfortunately for the Church, monarchs in the Middle Ages began to realize that the Church has become an interference with their power, leading to violent feuds between Church and state in France and England.
The Edict of Nantes had given Protestants, or Huguenots, in France the ability to practice their religion without fear of violence or persecution. Enacted in the late 1500s in an effort to resemble France after the destruction of the French Wars of Religion, the Edict of Nantes served as a means to unite the French population and end the violence that often accompanied religious persecution. Louis’ decision to revoke such a peace-promoting edict, in an effort to homogenize his country and align his subjects with his own beliefs, clearly illustrates his giving of priority to his own agenda, as opposed to that which would best benefit his country. However, while the claim that the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes was detrimental to French society, seems to be disproven by Doc 6, which essentially asserts that the king’s revocation has resulted in the rapid conversion of “whole towns” and describes the king as “the invincible hero destined to… destroy the terrible monster of heresy”, the author’s inherently biased point of view must be addressed. This description, which could be used as evidence to support the fact that Louis did act in interest of the state, must be taken with a grain of salt as the author himself, a member of the Assembly of the Clergy, does not even have the best interest of the state in mind; rather, he is
Since heretics were a big problem according to the church, Pope Innocent III got involved. Pope Innocent III called a crusade on heretics which started a war. Pope Innocent III called the crusade on heretics because he believed they were too big of a threat to ignore. It was a 20 year, long, bloody battle against the heretics. The result of the war was that the war destroyed many towns and thousands of people were killed. The war took place in France. He and the church wanted the country to be heretic free. Almost all heretics were killed during the bloody 20 year war. (Burstein and Shek).
The palace of Versailles was built by King Louis XIV of France and the Escorial was built by King Philip II of Spain. The two kings each had their differences about their beliefs on how to rule, yet there are some similarities. Louis XIV believed in showing off his power and being open. Philip II was a simplistic guy devoted to Catholicism. They both had military to spread their beliefs and ideas. Despite the kings’ beliefs, their palaces reflected their ideals.
by Spain and the pope, however, the league refused to accept a Protestant king of France
others on the greedy, false doctrine of indulgences. And the Pope at the time was Pope Leo X. Pope Leo reigned from 1513 to 1521 when he died. This was the act that started the Reformation and the stand that Martin Luther took to go against the Pope.
Lay investiture was a major problem during the reign of King Henry IV and the papacy of Pope Gregory VII. Up to this point, secular leaders had the power to appoint bishops and abbots in their land, causing a blend between the lines of Church and state. Gregory or “Hildebrand” recognized this dilemma and restricted investiture to the duty of the pope in 1075. Henry IV responded very cruelly and Hildebrand promptly excommunicated him. The Concordat of Worms eventually solved this controversy in 1122, in which lay investiture by secular leaders was eliminated. This was one of the first examples of the struggle between Church and state and it certainly was not the last.
After King of England, Henry VIII (1491 – 1547) separated the Church of England from the authority of the Pope, the Crown took control of the church in the country. As such, after the English Reformation in the 16th century, the Crown ordered...
The person who was most to blame for the death of Becket was King Henry, ruler of Britain and Becket’s friend. It may seem strange that Becket’s death was mainly caused by his friend, but this could have been avoided if not Henry had appointed Becket’s the Archbishop of Canterbury. Firstly, Henry did not follow the standard procedure to appoint the archbishop – he was mainly biased for the reason that he wanted it to be his friend. Secondly, Henry knew that as Becket as Archbishop, his rules and orders came from the Pope and God, so it was understandable when Becket refused to do what Henry had requested since it was against his doings as an Archbishop. However, there was a major dispute between them, which could have been settled if not for Henry’s quick temper.
The aim of absolute monarchy was to provide ‘stability, prosperity, and order’ for our territories (458). The way Louis XIV set forth to accomplish this was to claim complete sovereignty, to make laws, sanction justice, declare wars, and implement taxes on its subjects. This was all done without the approval of any government or Parliament, as monarchs were to govern ‘by divine right, just as fathers ruled their households’ (458). In Bishop Jacques-Benigne Bossuet’s Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture, he described that absolution was one of the four characteristics imperative to royal authority, “Without this absolute authority, he can do neither good nor suppress evil; his power must be such that no one can hope to escape him” (460). This was epitomized when Louis XIV sought to control the legal system as well as the funding of the financial resources through a centralized bureaucracy for the monarchy.
The prestige of papacy has faltered many times during the History of the Roman Catholic Church. One of the largest issues with papacy prior to the time of reformation was the influence of France on the church. Throughout history countries or monarchies have often fought for power and influence over the church and state. For a period of time, the papacy left residency in Rome and moved to Avignon, France due to France’s strength influence of the popes of the time. The results of this residency would affect both the church and all people in the surrounding areas. Not only that, but the effects lasted well on past the residency eventually leading to the Great Schism. In order to understand the effect of Avignon papacy it is important to
A king of England could not remove a pope from his position but popes claimed that they could remove a king by excommunicating him - this meant that the king’s soul was condemned to Hell and people then had the right to disobey the king.
If one thing is for certain, it is that the pope and the Catholic church played a huge role in Medieval Europe. They helped shaped the people’s lives and political authority. While the pope was in control of the Catholic church, he was also in control of politics; he was over the kings, and the kings had to answer to the pope. While having so much political power, it eventually lead to the kings wanting their power back and trying different ways to get it back, which lead to a decline in the pope’s authority. The decrease in the pope’s authority lead to the Great Schism; where Europe was split up due to disagreements in the Papacy.
The Christian clergy and the papacy have always been a little corrupt. This is evident before the Black Death, after the Black Death, and during the Renaissance. Christian clergy and the papacy have always had a lot of power, and they abused that power. This is apparent, from as far back as before the Black Death, in the actions of the Bishop of Munster and the Archbishop of Cologne during the year 1074. During that time the archbishop sent out his servants to take a boat from a merchant so the Bishop could have a ride home. Because of this a fight occurred. People of towns believed that archbishops were governing in a tyrannical manner. During and after the Black Death, the church declined further; as Prices went up to see a priest, illiterate
The Great Schism originated in 1309, when Pope Clement V moved the papacy from Italy to Avignon, just outside of French territory. The move was the result of the constant power struggle in Rome between the Pope and the king. The purpose of the move was to insure the Pope freedom of action, but it appeared that the move allowed the King of France, Phillip the Fair, to wield a great deal of influence over the Pope. Many felt that the presence of the papacy in France compromised the Pope's independence and made it the vassal of the French King. In 1376, Pope Gregory XI made a significant move and returned the papacy to Rome. After his death, the College of Cardinals convened to choose the new Pope. "The people of Rome and the vicinity, turbulent and easily roused, had, under the sway of circumstances, loudly declared their preferences and antipathies, and endeavored to influence the decision of the cardinals" (Knight). The Roman mobs insisted on an Italian pope, and the cardinals elected Urban VI. The French did not approve of the new Pope or the method by which he was chosen, so they elected their own Pope, Clement VII, who would once again rule from Avignon. As a result, "Western Chris...
Early in history, the Roman papacy consolidated its power. It became one of the most influential organizations in the medieval period. This rise to power resulted from the decline in the Western Empire, the leadership of Roman bishops, and special grants that gave the church land holdings. This rise to power caused some positive ramifications, such as the protection of the church from heresy. However, the absolute power of the pope also caused corruption and abuses, many of which would eventually spark the reformation.