Comparing Shcliff And Shrek

670 Words2 Pages

Thorslev, writes “The Byronic Gothic Villain (of the novel, at least) is never sympathetic” (Thorslev 22). Neither, Heathcliff nor Shrek has any sympathetic behavior. Both characters do not mind doing what they have to so they feel protected. Also, if they feel they have been wronged by someone, they will not hold back on their wrath when it comes to soliciting revenge. Heathcliff and Shrek carry themselves of being dominant characters, which is important for a Gothic Villain, Thorslev writes that “An air of mystery is his dominant trait, and characteristic of all his acts” (Thorslev 54).
Which makes sense for these characters to possess that mystery with a dominant trait. Three years after Heathcliff returned to Wuthering Heights no one …show more content…

Thorslev writes “He is suffering from unrequited love; in spite of his often-confessed preference for solitude and his dislike for mankind, he is a humanitarian” (Thorslev 137). Heathcliff’s whole meaning of happiness in life depending on Cathy loving him. While, at moments he received spurts of love from her he was happy. But because of the rules of society he never truly received the love he wanted from her. Focusing on Shrek, in this regard, it fits him perfectly. In Shrek, everyone in the swamp that lived around him depended on him to fight for their land. Although, Shrek was still an isolated person, he knew that he carried the burden of the land and swamp people. The act that he committed shows how deep down he has noble characteristics. Those characteristics just have to be brought up. Secondly, Thorslev comments that “Like most Romantic poetic personalities, he has been “fated,” set apart from other men, alienated from the social world of which he would otherwise gladly be a part” (Thorslev 137). In Wuthering Heights on countless occasions, Heathcliff tried to go out of his way to fit in with the society. As a young child he would try to set aside certain traits that he was born with just so others could be comfortable. Leaving for three years, Heathcliff returned back with money and still was not viewed as a Nobel person in society. No matter what

Open Document