Comparing Rosencrantz And Guildenstern In Shakespeare's Hamlet

920 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effects of betrayal

“Believe in yourself and be true to yourself always.” We’ve been taught that no matter what, people should always be their true selves. From childhood to adults, personality defines how people see each other. What if someone decided to be true to themselves but ended up doing something bad in return? Claudius stopped at nothing to get what he wanted. Polonius was just crazy and tried to please the king. Then Rosencrantz and Guildenstern did whatever they were told and ended up murdered for it! Normally when people stay true to themselves it's assumed it's positive, but these characters deciding to stay true to themselves led to the deaths of others.
Claudius is one of the best examples of a character staying true to themselves that has a …show more content…

Throughout the entire play they both are basically Claudius’ secondhand men. At different parts, they show up asking questions, giving requests by the king, or attempting to investigate a problem that Claudius told them to figure out. Hamlet brings up the fact that they are like sponges in the King's hand:
That I can keep your counsel and not mine own.
Besides, to be demanded of a sponge - what replication
should be made by the son of a king?(4.2.10-12)
They are like trained dogs that do anything their master tells them to do. Hamlet was heading back to England, since the King was trying to get rid of him, and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were sent after him to make sure that the plan was followed through. Claudius sent a letter to the King of England asking him to kill Hamlet as soon as he arrived. Hamlet found the letter and inserted Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s names into the letter instead of his. The King of England got the letter and beheaded them as soon as they arrived, showing Claudius inadvertently got them killed as well.
And our affairs from England come too late.
The ears are senseless that should give us hearing
To tell him his commandment is

Show More
Related

  • Going Sour In Hamlet

    819 Words  | 2 Pages

    In their case, it is Hamlet 's intention to make sure Rosencrantz and Guildenstern 's plan works against them. Since Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s mission is to make sure that Hamlet goes to England to be killed, Hamlet takes it upon himself to ensure their heads are on the chopping block, not his. Hamlet does this by taking the letter that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are going to give to the king of England and replacing it. The letter that Hamlet replaces it with says that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are the ones to be killed. Since Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are out of the picture this allows for Hamlet to return to Denmark to continue his plot of revenge on the King. When Hamlet returns back to Denmark Horatio asks Hamlet if he feels that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s deaths are a burden to him. Hamlet replies, “Why, man, they did make love to this employment. / They are not near my conscience. Their defeat / Does by their own insinuation grow” (Shakespeare 5.2.64-66). Since Hamlet is back in Denmark, this allows for Laertes to attempt to gain revenge on the murderer of his

    Read More

  • The Foils in Hamlet

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    Of the four young men who occupy a place in the life of Hamlet, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern appear, at least initially, to be his closest friends. They are schoolmates at Wittenburg, and Hamlet greets them both amicably, remarking, " My excellent good friends! How dost thou,....." Queen Gertrude affirms the status of their relationship when she says, "And sure I am two men there is not living to whom he more adheres." Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are unaware, however, of the real story behind the death of Hamlet’s Father. They do not have the benefit of seeing his ghost, as Hamlet has. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are very loyal to the new King. Unlike Hamlet, they initially have no reason not to trust Claudius. But they become unwitting and unknowing pawns for both factions. Their relationship with Hamlet begins to sour. Hamlet realizes what the King is up to, and he becomes distrustful of the two. "’Sblood, do you think I am easier to be played on than a pipe?...

    Read More

  • An Analysis on Claudius

    634 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Hamlet, Shakespeare developed a character, an antagonist, which produces twists and turns throughout the play. Even though in the beginning of the play, Claudius seemed to be an intelligent man, who has excellent speaking skills that helped him take the leadership of his deceased brother’s kingdom, and marry his wife. But, combining both his intelligence and excellent speaking skills, shows Claudius’s true nature: an astute, lustful conspirator. Through the different settings and situations, Claudius’s character contributes to the overall understanding of the play through psychological, biblical and philosophical methods.

    Read More

  • This above all, to thine own self be true: Being True to Yourself

    696 Words  | 2 Pages

    Claudius is also a character who is neither true to himself nor to others: he is not being true to the rest of the kingdom. He does not want to give up his gains, so the people of Denmark do not know why their previous King has died and his brother taken over. While making an attempt to pray, he realizes that his sins cannot be forgiven.

    Read More

  • Free Essays - The Trap Motif in Hamlet

    632 Words  | 2 Pages

    It scares Claudius and makes him afraid of Hamlet. * Hamlet is now sure that Claudius is the murderer, but Claudius is so worried that he sends Hamlet to England with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern with an order for Hamlet to be killed.

    Read More

  • Free Hamlet Essays: Deceit and the Downfall of Hamlet

    1033 Words  | 3 Pages

    Fortunately for Hamlet, Claudius' deceit fails. This deceit, however, still does contribute to the eventual downfall of Hamlet. Aboard the ship to England, Hamlet discovers Claudius' message being sent by Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Hamlet explains later, "Groped I to find out them, [Rosencrantz and Guildenstern] had my desire, fingered their packet, and in fine withdrew.

    Read More

  • The Character of King Claudius in Shakespeare's Hamlet

    3001 Words  | 7 Pages

    Delving into the character of King Claudius in Shakespeare’s tragedy, Hamlet, we find a character who is not totally evil but rather a blend of morally good and bad elements. Let’s explore the various dimensions of this many-sided character.

    Read More

  • Claudius As A Machiavelli Villain

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    Claudius shows no remorse for the deaths of any of the other characters that he has indirectly brought fatal ends to. Claudius also found others that were willing to do his work for him. Lastly, Claudius was continually ensuring that his throne was never at risk of being taken by eliminating anyone who may jeopardized his plan for power. Through Claudius’ lack of remorse, manipulation of others, and constant defence of his position on the throne, Claudius is a perfect Machiavelli Villain. He is one to follow all the guidelines that were essential, from Machiavelli’s point of view, to be a powerful king. Although, in the fatal end, he lost the one thing he strived for most, power.

    Read More

  • Comparision Of Hamlet With Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Are Dead

    1314 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead (R and G…) by Tom Stoppard is a transformation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet that has been greatly influenced due to an external contextual shift. The sixteenth century Elizabethan historical and social context, accentuating a time of questioning had specific values which are transformed and altered in Stoppard’s Existential, post two-world wars twentieth century historical and social context. The processes of transformation that are evident allow the shifts in ideas, values and external contexts to be clearly depicted. This demonstrates the significance of the transformation allowing new interpretations and ideas about reality as opposed to appearance, death and the afterlife and life’s purpose to be displayed, enabling further insight and understanding of both texts.

    Read More

  • Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead versus Hamlet

    1098 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, written in the 1960s by playwright Tom Stoppard, is a transforation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Stoppard effectively relocates Shakespeare’s play to the 1960s by reassessing and revaluating the themes and characters of Hamlet and considering core values and attitudes of the 1960s- a time significantly different to that of Shakespeare. He relies on the audience’s already established knowledge of Hamlet and transforms a revenge tragedy into an Absurd drama, which shifts the focus from royalty to common man. Within Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, Stoppard uses a play within a play to blur the line that defines reality, and in doing so creates confusion both onstage- with his characters, and offstage- with the audience. Using these techniques, Stoppard is able make a statement about his society, creating a play that reflected the attitudes and circumstances of the 1960s, therefore making it more relevant and relatable to the audiences of that time.

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between Hamlet And Claudius, Hamlet, And Gertrude

    1181 Words  | 3 Pages

    The path one takes to seek a personal reward may result in the treacherous acts that causes devastation for others. In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the moral corruption that occurs between family members causes animosity that results in their downfall, and eventually their ultimate demise. More specifically, the tainted view of an individual in a family may result in the downfall of the other family members involved. Evidence of the tainted view of a family member causing undue harm can be found in the relationship between Hamlet and Claudius, Hamlet and Old King Hamlet, and Hamlet and Gertrude

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Hamlet and Claudius

    1922 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...udius and Hamlet pose various similarities, but they hate each other. They plot to kill one another because of the death of Hamlet’s biological father. Their similarities come from the time period that they are living in, and the fact that Hamlet’s father was king and was involved in war leaving Hamlet with his uncle. His uncle’s behavior had an impact on the man that Hamlet became. They both have similar situations; plotting to kill someone, scheming, etc. They both create similar situations for themselves, for example having advisors or their inability to act, but they do have differences. Hamlet is angry whereas Claudius is just trying to save himself.

    Read More

  • Hamlet and Claudius’ Power Struggle

    1838 Words  | 4 Pages

    Claudius is seen in Hamlets eyes as a horrible person because he convicted murder and incest. Claudius had killed the king of Denmark, Old Hamlet, to obtain the position of the throne. He had been jealous of Old Hamlet’s wife Gertrude and wanted to marry her for her power. Although, such an act would be called incest and considered unnatural he did not care, all he had cared about was the power that he would be stealing from Hamlet and Old Hamlet, Gertrude’s son and husband (R). When Hamlet had talked to his f...

    Read More

  • Free Hamlet Essays: The Downfall of Hamlet

    695 Words  | 2 Pages

    For Guildenstern and Rosencrantz to betray Hamlet the way they did is utterly despicable. Especially considering that their taking the orders from Claudius. Claudius turns out to be quite a good lire, and shows his skill of being able to manipulate people, into doing what he wants. "Welcome, dear Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Moreover that we much did long to see you, the need we have to use you did provoke our hasty sending". ( II;ii; 1-4). Since Rosencrantz and Guildenstern spied on Hamlet, and brought back the fact that he is mad to Claudius. Claudius could then figure out Hamlet’s next move, and counter act it with his own. " Was not like madness. There’s something in his soul." ( III; i; 161). If Claudius hadn’t had Guildenstern or Rosencrantz to aid him in his efforts, I think Hamlet could have had a chance at survival.

    Read More

  • Shakespere's Hamlet and Humanism

    884 Words  | 2 Pages

    Claudius “is the most modern character” that “has no reservations” (Hamlet, Tragedy) when he murders his own brother so that he may gain the crown and the queen. He removes of a great and honorable king to please his greed. He removes his brother, the good of the country, and the pleasure of many to satisfy his own ambition. Claudius only cares about himself. Realizing it or not, most individuals, at one point or another, will be motivated by gluttony. Most, however, will not have the willpower and anxiety that Claudius shows. This is partially because of the alterations of the times. In the historical time that Shakespeare wrote the play, killing was profoundly ...

    Read More

More about Comparing Rosencrantz And Guildenstern In Shakespeare's Hamlet

Open Document