Comparing Rabbit-Proof Fence And Noyce's Of Mice

1143 Words3 Pages

Often in life, there are situations in which they cannot be done alone. To overcome these difficult situations, the power of relationships can prove to be of significant value. On the one hand, Phillip Noyce’s film Rabbit-Proof Fence is a great example, showing that through strong familial bonds, one can overcome a difficult situation. The situation being that three aboriginal girls have escaped from an institution meant to ‘rehabilitate’ them, leading to a long nine-week journey across the Western Australian outback to return home while being chased. On the other hand, John Steinbeck’s novel Of Mice and Men, in contrast to Rabbit-Proof Fence is the opposite, failing to overcome a difficult situation, but it does show the power of relations …show more content…

This is successfully portrayed in Rabbit-Proof Fence. In Rabbit-Proof Fence, even when all the odds were stacked against Molly and Daisy, through the power of relations, they successfully returned home, overcoming the difficult situation, albeit with the loss of Gracie. Their victory is seen at the end of the film through a close-up shot in combination with an eye-level angle of Molly, Daisy, Maud, and Molly’s grandmother all reuniting. The close-up allows the audience to see and feel their expressions, with them crying tears of joy and being extremely happy to see each other again. But amidst all this, Molly says that “I lost one”, she is referring to Gracie, who got caught, as she did not stay together with Molly and Daisy. Like in Of Mice and Men, the loss of both Gracie and Lennie can be compared, showing that both Molly and George, supposed caretakers, have failed. The use of the eye-level angle shows the audience that they are on equal footing, creating a sense of comfort. This close-up shot in combination with the eye-level angle proves that through the power of relations, a difficult situation can be overcome, which is not apparent in Of Mice and …show more content…

This in contrast to Of Mice and Men has not been successfully portrayed. This is evident from the loss of Lennie at the end of the novel, the person George, his supposed caretaker, was responsible for, this can also be compared with the loss of Gracie, as Molly can also be seen as a caretaker. The failure to overcome a difficult situation is evident through this line “George shivered and looked at the gun, and then he threw it from him, back up on the bank, near the pile of old ashes” (pg. 53). This quote expresses how George felt after he himself had shot Lennie, killing him, while also featuring some symbolism in the form of the pile of old ashes. George shivering, in this case, indicates that he himself felt remorse for his actions, knowing that he had failed Lennie as the one responsible for his wellbeing. This is further reinforced, as the old ashes symbolize penitence, meaning regret and sorrow for having done wrong, telling the audience that George was seeking repentance. These techniques in combination also tell the audience that the situation George and Lennie were presented with was far too difficult to overcome with the power of relations, hence the loss of Lennie and George’s failure. In contrast to Rabbit-Proof Fence, where it showed the ability to overcome a difficult situation with the power of relations, Of Mice and Men has shown

Open Document