Neuromancer, by William Gibson, and The Female Vagrant, by William Wordsworth, are two pieces of literature, which are extremely different in many ways. They are unalike in literary style, geographic location, and time setting. Neuromancer is a science fiction novel, written in nineteen eighty-four, but is set in the technologically advanced dystopian world of the cyberspace future. In opposing contrast as far as setting and type of literature, The Female Vagrant is one poem within a lyrical ballad written in seventeen ninety-eight and set in the present time of its publishing. One thing both these pieces share in common though, is the theme of industrialization through advancements in technology and society. More importantly is that both these writings share how the common idea of industrialization can negatively impact the …show more content…
For William Gibson, the question he is asking is whether new technologies can change what is means to be fundamentally human. For The Female Vagrant the question William Wordsworth is asking is more directed towards the social problems which modernization caused, and is used, as more of a means of social discourse and affirmative action is his writing.
In summary Neuromancer, by William Gibson, and The Female Vagrant, by William Wordsworth, are two pieces of literature, which are extremely different in many ways. Different in literary style, tone, diction and setting yet similar under one thing, the theme of industrialization through advancements in technology and society.
More importantly is that both these writings share how the common idea of industrialization can negatively impact the characters within each story, while relaying a relevant message to the readers themselves about their own society and its current nature; nevertheless, both these pieces go about demonstrating this completely opposite
...ide: ". . .one does not remain inert to make way for the other, but both obey their own laws, and spring and grow and flourish as best they can, till one, perchance, overshadows and destroys the other." All three of these comparisons, while being beneficial to the essay's main idea, are too obscure and irrelevant to have any real persuasive power.
In conclusion both short stories were great at allowing us the reader to see the way that women were repressed in their society in the 1900s. We don't hate the men; we just wish women did not have to be so subservient. Freedom is achieved in very unconventional ways in both of these stories, but the kind of freedom these narrators achieve is not available to most women of this time era.
Thus, both novels, full of tragedy and sorrow, began with the promise of new land, new beginnings and a better life, but all three were impossible to find within the pages of these novels. In the end, it was broken relationships, broken families, broken communities, but most importantly, broken dreams and broken hopes that were left on the final pages of both woeful, yet celebrated, stories.
...sitive, as they can easily degenerate into the lowest-tier of society if they cannot cope with the feelings caused by these events. Though both novels somewhat end on a positive upbeat, and this demonstrates the mastery of both authors through their amazing literary legacy in the form of these two novels.
They both show the consequences of gaining knowledge and of staying ignorant, and why both gaining knowledge and staying ignorant help the oppressive forces gain power over the human race.
The twentieth century was filled with many advances which brought a variety of changes to the world. However, these rapid advances brought confusion to almost all realms of life; including gender roles, a topic which was previously untouched became a topic of discourse. Many authors of the time chose to weigh in on the colloquy. In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and Kate Chopin’s The Awakening, gender role confusion, characteristic of modernist literature, is seen in Nick Carraway and Edna Pontillier as they are the focal points in the exploration of what it means to be a man or a woman, their purpose, place, and behavior in society.
Both stories show the characters inequality with their lives as women bound to a society that discriminates women. The two stories were composed in different time frames of the women’s rights movement; it reveals to the readers, that society was not quite there in the fair treatment towards the mothers, daughters, and wives of United States in either era. Inequality is the antagonist that both authors created for the characters. Those experiences might have helped that change in mankind to carve a path for true equality among men and women.
Both films explore the concept of dystopia in a media controlled society and the true power which hope possesses. Moreover, both texts highlight the way leaders use their positions to manipulate to their advantage. However, both texts exemplify the oppression the characters are confronted with and endorse the way certain individuals challenge unjust authority figures.
This essay has compared the differences between the societies in these two novels. There is one great similarity however that both make me thankful for having been born into a freethinking society where a person can be truly free. Our present society may not be truly perfect, but as these two novels show, it could be worse.
In the beginning of both of the pieces of literature, the main character(s) have not had the experience that will shape their values yet. Rather, as time moves forward in the stories, the
The struggles both characters face demonstrate character development and contribute to the themes of the stories. Both short stories prove to be literally effective in that they disclose the main themes at the outset of each story. Although the themes may alter over the course of the stories, they are clearly defined in their respective introductions.
William Gibson’s Neuromancer is Cyberpunk. Science fiction somehow manages to place human characters in situations where the ideas and the thoughts of science and morality are intertwined. Science fiction must have some idea components and some human components to be successful. This novel seems to be a contrast to the believers in technological progress as it presents a colorful, but depressing and desolate future. The loss of individuality due to technological advances becomes a major theme in cyberpunk.
The 19th century was a time of massive change socially, politically and scientifically. This time saw the rise of Imperialism and of the Industrial Revolution in Britain, seeing massive changes in the way industry was run. Also during this time the literary movements of Romanticism and Victorianism emerged. Romanticism dealt with the issues of reality versus illusion, childhood and man versus nature. The first book I will examine in this essay, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, comes from this literary period and focuses on the man versus nature theme, namely the theme of scientific development and it’s contrast to nature. The second book I will look at in this essay comes from the Victorian period of the 19th century. This period saw the rise of the Industrial Revolution and of huge social and political change. Hard Times by Charles Dickens deals with these issues very closely, focussing mainly on the rise of industry in Britain and its effects on the people of Britain. Both of these novels challenge the social, political and scientific developments of the 19th century, namely the advent of science and technology.
Both stories show feminism of the woman trying to become free of the male dominance. Unfortunately, the woman are not successful at becoming free. In the end, the two women’s lives are drastically
These two works may both be looked at from a Marxist point of view in finding explanation for the authors' purpose in putting pen to paper. When using a Marxist approach to analyzing literature we must bear in mind several key terms. As we look at these texts we must bear in mind what the bourgeoisie is; this is the upper or ruling class of a society. They are in place to rule due to their control over the "base, or the economic means of production" (Bressler 212). Because the have control over the base the bourgeoisie will, "consciously and unconsciously force" their "ideology" on the proletariat, or working class. The ideology referred to is the beliefs, values, and art of a society. When analyzing Coketown and Watercress Girl we can see definite influence on the ideologies of the proletariat by the bourgeoisie conveyed in the text.