Comparing Mein Kampf And The Origin Of Species By Charles Darwin

679 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Arguments against charles darwins theory of evolution

In their work Mein Kampf (My struggle) and The Origin of Species, Charles Darwin and Darwin explains how we live by the laws that act around us that we have no control over. Hitler in his auto biography Mein Kampf he explains almost the same thing also describing that humans “cannot be subject to special laws”. I feel that the two pieces of work have the same message of natural selection being a factor in war and the way we behave, but the two authors both have their own way looking at it. Charles Darwin I fell is trying to explain the laws of life and Hitler seems like he is demanding and telling the reader what they should believe. Both of them make valid arguments but they are coming from different point of views. In the …show more content…

But he describes it with a different tone than Darwin did as he seems to talk about himself as a dictator. He does this by saying “He will then feel that in a world in which planets and suns follow circular trajectories, moons revolve around planets, and force reigns everywhere and supreme over weakness”(Hitler) explaining that he himself is natural selection and nothing else is more powerful than him. Which is why he was responsible for so many deaths and the holocaust because he felt that he was a higher being than the Jews, who he thought were in a conspiracy to take the world over. Which causes his to say “Man cannot be subject to special laws of his own.” meaning that everyone he sees as inferior has no power over

Show More
Related

  • Historical Analysis Of Gerald Fleming's 'Hitler And The Final Solution'

    1079 Words  | 3 Pages

    before he came to power, he just used World War II as his golden opportunity to turn his dream into a reality. Others, with Andreas Hillgruber, argue Hitler was the only reason genocide even happened. If Hitler had not been in control, the Holocaust would have ceased to exist. His key sources include the Nuremburg Trials, quoting him saying “this struggle will not end with annihilation of Aryan mankind, but with the extermination of the Jewish people of Europe.” By using Hitler’s own words against him, Hillgruber makes it easy to prove Hitler’s malicious intent clearly and depict him as the mastermind behind the mass murder of the Jewish population. Gerald Fleming creates the last sub-argument in his book, “Hitler and the Final Solution,” provides an in-depth historical evaluation of German fascism and the mechanization behind the Nazi Party bureaucracy. His main point of reference is David Irving’s, “Hitler’s War,”

    Read More

  • Is Dr. Seuss Portrayal Of Hitler's Character In A Political Cartoon

    971 Words  | 2 Pages

    Dr. Seuss portrayed Hitler’s character in the political cartoon, “The latest Self-Portrait” (86). He “depicts Hitler as simultaneously sculptor, subject, mermaid and putti crowning Hitler with knight’s helmet” (74). The multiple Hitlers in the cartoon takes “a jab at Hitler’s unlimited ego” (74). In this cartoon, it seems as if Dr. Seuss is telling the American people that Hitler thinks too highly of himself and shows his distrust in other people. It comes across that Hitler is the kind of person who believes that they have to do everything in order for it to be right. “Dr.

    Read More

  • The Perfect Race: Adolf Hitler And His Nazis

    122 Words  | 1 Pages

    Did you know that even though Hitler had brown hair and blue eyes, his idea of a superior race was those with blond hair and blue eyes? He wanted this group of people to be superior to all other races because they represented a clean view of Germany. Hitler used his power to achieve this goal by enforcing many rules and creating many different projects. He wanted the people of Germany to believe that they were superior to all other races and they must do everything to maintain the standards of living in Nazi Germany. Adolf Hitler and his Nazis created the perfect race by influencing the education of children and creating bride schools, the Hitler Youth Program, and Lebensborn birthing homes.

    Read More

  • Discourse On Colonialism In The City Of God By E. L Doctorow

    1743 Words  | 4 Pages

    He states and restates that the Aryan race is the supreme race of the world and that the Jews are at the bottom. So for the Aryan race to succeed and grow, Hitler strongly believes that a pure Aryan blood is the answer. He says that many Aryan conquerors have failed to maintain power because they start to mix with those who are conquered. In his book he heavily belittles the Jews by denouncing them imitators, egoistic, and destructive. According to him they are imitators because “his [Jewish] intelligence is not the result of his own development, but of visual instruction through foreigners” (Hitler, Pg. 134). He also believes that they have “no culture of their own”, and that the “sham” of the culture they have is the “property of other people”. He also expresses his view about that Jew’s egoistic and lack of self sacrificing nature. He describes the Jews as only looking out for themselves and claiming that they are only “united when a common danger forces him [Jews] to be” (Hitler, 135). He professes that if Jews were left alone in the world then their destructive nature would lead them to exterminate one another. Other reason for his allegation that Jews are destructive include that they destroy the property they own and that they destroy other cultures. He comes to the conclusion that those who are not pure Aryan blood are “chaff”,

    Read More

  • Racial Theories Leading to the Third Reich

    967 Words  | 2 Pages

    As one learns when reading The Racial State, Adolf Hitler's eugenic and racial-hygienic theories were not original. Theorists long before his time wrote of the same racist theories. Hitler never mentions any of these theorists in his work, but one can see when reading The Racial State, that the horrific acts that occurred during the Third Reich reflected the ideas of these theorists.

    Read More

  • The Doctrine Of Fascism: A Comparative Analysis

    565 Words  | 2 Pages

    In all accounts Hitler’s book is way more convincing. By showing examples of why he wants a fascist state, unlike Benito who was explaining why he rejected to other types of governments, but he does make a point that Fascism should not treat men as animals. But, I do believe that Hitler made his point more convincing than

    Read More

  • Cultural Relativism: A Critical Examination

    1027 Words  | 3 Pages

    He argues that the ideas of Hitler’s Nazi regime was just as ethical as Mother Teresa’s sermons on peace. This is where his argument begins to fall apart. He argues that Hitler 's Nazi regime was morally correct for his time, but only regards importance of moralistic qualities to the people in

    Read More

  • Survival in Auschwitz by Primo Levi

    1143 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hitler believed that life was all about struggle; in order to live a full life you must struggle and overcoming this struggle is the true meaning of life. Hitler believes that only the strongest will survive, and the weak will succumb and cease to exist, which ultimately will better the country as a whole. Hitler carried out many projects to weed out the weak, and build his strong ‘perfect’ nation; this included Action T4, concentration and death camps. Auschwitz is Hitler’s creation; it is his constructed society to exterminate the Jewish population through immense struggle, by not only killing them, but he also attempts to strip them of every single shred of humanity until there is nothing left and they serve simply as economic investments. Those who survived did not allow their humanity to be confiscated.

    Read More

  • The Duel

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    Of course, the threat of violence was always present but Hitler was smart enough that he could scare his enemies enough that they would not want to engage in combat. Once actually forced to fight, Hitler still dominated and he could have very possibly won the war if not for that one fatal mistake he made by hesitating in his plans against the English. I think it is important that Lukacs makes sure to get this message across because some people choose to ignore this truth due to the devastating outcomes that would have resulted if Hitler succeeded. The major point presented by Lukacs concerning the difference between Hitler and Churchill has to do with nationalim versus patriotism. Lukacs describes Hitler as a nationalist and Churchill as a patriot. He describes Hitler as a man of ideas and Churchill as a of man principles, because Churchill's ideas changed throughout the war while Hitler tended to think that his ideas were principles.

    Read More

  • Social Darwinism In The Jungle By Upton Sinclair

    619 Words  | 2 Pages

    Social Darwinism is the central theme that dominated the novel “The Jungle” by Upton Sinclair. Upton had demonstrated successfully how social Darwinism is not the way for a functional society to thrive, thus providing a solution like Socialism to the readers. Social Darwinism, putting into the simplest context, is the theory of society where the rich survives and the poor dies; whoever could make the most money and bribe the most power would win the game, while for the people who have to find job and money are the one designated to fail. Jurgis Rudkus was a Lithuanian immigrant that came to America seeking fortune for his family, thinking that he would achieve the “American Dream” if only he retained his diligence with work. Sadly he is not getting any prosperity, “The great corporation which employed you lied to you, and lied to the whole country—from top to bottom it was nothing but one gigantic lie.” (Sinclair 62) He soon found out he would not be able to gain success, but only through corruption and later Socialism.

    Read More

  • Why Did A.J.P Taylor’s Analysis of the Origins of the Second World War Cause Such Controversy Among Historians?

    774 Words  | 2 Pages

    It was broadly considered that the Second World War began in 1939 because of Hitler’s plan for world domination; many historians validated this view at the time until A.J.P. Taylor published his book ‘Origins of the Second World War’ in 1961. A. J. P Taylor was the first historian to examine the war with a completely open mind, forcing people to view the origins not as a moral issue but as a political history. Taylor regards the start of the war as a blunder on both sides, stating that “Hitler had no clear-cut plan and instead was a supreme opportunist, taking advantages as they came.” From this Taylor suggests that neither Hitler nor any other Powers want this war. However, because his argument caused such a debate, it led other historians to criticise the methods Taylor used to establish his argument. Hugh Trevor-Roper says that “Mr Taylor hardly ever refers to Mein Kampf...” Mein Kampf is seen as an essential piece of writing when examining the origins of the war. Within Mein Kampf was not a detailed policy of what Hitler planned to do, but the “oracular pronouncement, pointing the way towards the harsh historical path that Germany must tread” argues Overy. Therefore, Taylor’s analysis was so controversial because it forced people to view the origins of the war in a totally new way, not looking at Hitler as a world dominating fascist like everyone thought, but as a normal statesman.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Mein Kampf

    1260 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mein Kampf was Adolf Hitler’s life story and his ideals about the world. The first nine chapters of the book explain how he got into his current predicament. Then he goes into great detail on why he dislikes the Jews and why all Germans should dislike the Jews as well. Hitler writes about the Jewish press and how they influence the society:

    Read More

  • Archetypes of Wisdom

    747 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jonathan Judaken. Review of Weikart, Richard, From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany. H-Ideas, H-Net Reviews. June, 2005.

    Read More

  • Nazi Eugenics and Racial Hygiene

    1198 Words  | 3 Pages

    Adolf Hitler (the Führer or leader of the Nazi party) “believed that a person's characteristics, attitudes, abilities, and behavior were determined by his or her so-called racial make-up.” He thought that those “inherited characteristics (did not only affect) outward appearance and physical structure”, but also determined a person’s physical, emotional/social, and mental state. Besides these ideas, the Nazi’s believed tha...

    Read More

  • The Characteristics Of Adolf Hitler

    1529 Words  | 4 Pages

    This is what had made Hitler one of the greatest public speakers that the world had ever seen from his time and in history. "The German people and it 's soldiers work and fight today not for themselves and their own age, but also for many generations to come. A historical task of unique dimensions has been entrusted to us by the Creator that we are now obliged to carry out." Hitler, the Fuhrer of Germany, was a very talented spokesman in ways that leaders today could not even begin to compare with. He was charismatic and bold, making it easier for him to win over the minds of many Germans with these two traits. He believed that during his rise to power, he and the people of Germany had been given a duty by God to purify the nation of its imperfect races and weaker people so as to make the mother country strong again for future generations. "Those who want to live, let them fight, and those who do not want to fight in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live." In many ways, Hitler felt he was justified in what he was doing, and in some

    Read More

More about Comparing Mein Kampf And The Origin Of Species By Charles Darwin

Open Document