Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character analysis where are you going
123 essays on character analysis
Into the wild character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Character analysis where are you going
Deborah Ellis’ anthology Lunch With Lenin yields two boys named Matthew and Ramon share like and unlike traits. Both characters are the protagonists of their stories and remain static as they’ve been always making sacrifices for their family members. Matthew from “Through the Woods” courageously breaks the law to bring marijuana and care for his loving grandma. He also sacrifices his time, freedom, and happiness to ensure his Gran is at a state of peace. Ramon from “Dancing with Beads” faithfully serves his boss, Emilio by selling shaboo. Even though it’s illegal, Ramon fearlessly must work as a drug dealer anyways since it’s his only way for him to make a living to support his family. Both Matthew and Ramon care so deeply about their loved …show more content…
ones that they would go through extreme measures to support them. However, Ramon reveals himself to be anxious in his story contrasting from Matthew’s ability to stay calm. With their exceptional courage leading to their selfless acts, they make their families feel content and protected at all times. Not deterred by the law, Matthew and Ramon courageously face their obstacles.
Matthew undoubtedly purchases marijuana even though he could get a criminal record and face charges. Even the thugs at Matthew’s school do not bring fear into him. “It was no fun messing with someone who didn’t look scared… He wasn’t afraid of pain. Not anymore” (Ellis 2). It was clear that nothing was able to erode his courage. To compare, Ramon illegally and fearlessly makes a living for his family selling crystal meth. He also wants to traffick his kidney for the sake of his family despite his fear of going to jail. Both children don’t allow themselves to be stopped no matter how risky their actions are as long as they focus on their respective …show more content…
goals. Matthew and Ramon would both selflessly do what it takes to give their families peace of mind.
Matthew risks going to jail from his parents by giving his grandma marijuana to relieve her pain. He also gives up his time come visit his grandma, lying to her that he’s fine at home to negate her worries even further. “‘How are things at home?’ Gran asked. ‘The same,’ he said, then corrected himself. ‘Better.’ He tugged on his shirt cuff” (Ellis 9). Notwithstanding that his grandmother can care for Matthew, freeing him from his suffering at home, Matthew decided to instead tell his grandma otherwise because that’s just how much Matthew cares about her. Likewise, Ramon considered giving up his kidney and possibly his freedom because organ trafficking is illegal so his family wouldn’t have to be homeless. Also, he postponed his only career, risking getting fired, to spend quality time with his mother to make her happy. At the end of the day, Ramon and Matthew succeed to make their loved ones content all because they’re selfless. Due to the pain he’s used to, Matthew is easy-going and who can work well under pressure unlike Ramon who’s rather anxious because of his inexperience of adversity. Rather than asking the many “what if” questions Ramon would do, Matthew is quick and calm to when he executes his plans. He’s able to cope well with stress when he handles drugs in public which helps him lose suspicion and make his job even easier. Contrasting from Matthew, Ramon was anxious
and asking himself many questions, like when he was in the bathroom checking himself in the mirror. ‘Ramon slipped his hand up under his barong and felt the skin on his belly, tight under his ribs. He tried to remember where his kidneys were. He felt for organs, pressing and trying to guess at shapes. Would there be just an empty space in him with one kidney gone? Would one side of his body feel heavier than the other side. Would it hurt?’ (Ellis 96). His mom also surprised Ramon, telling him they would be going to the museum. Panicked, Ramon was confused and forgot his mother’s whole plan. These are what make Ramon a nervous and anxious person, contrasting from Matthew’s ability to stay calm. In Deborah Ellis’ Lunch With Lenin anthology Ramon and Matthew both courageously put themselves in danger for their loved ones but Ramon expresses his stress more than Matthew. In Ramon’s case, he gets his family their basic necessities by illegally working despite the consequences are for selling crystal meth. He also risks losing his only job to spend time with his mom. Similarly, Matthew periodically offers Gran relief from her pain not only physically from the marijuana, but emotionally as well, allotting himself time to keep his grandmother company. Matthew is easy-going because he’s adapted to the abuse his parents gives him at home. Ramon never suffered as much as Matthew so when the bad news of his home getting destroyed broke out, he panicked, not knowing how to deal with it. Matthew and Ramon continue to commit their courageous and selfless acts throughout their respective stories despite the adversity they both witness. In the end, family always comes first for both Ramon and Matthew and it has always been that way. Courageous sacrifices for family are what make Matthew and Ramon similar, however their ability to stay calm varies.
Martinez’s story is not so much one that pieces together the events of the crash, nor the lives of the three youths, but it is an immigrant’s tale, discovered through the crossings of the various Chavez family members and profiles of Cheranos in Mexico.
The lesson in “Los tres hermanos (The Three Brothers)” involves understanding that the characters involved failed to reflect on the needs of the thirsty, hungry and poor, the lonely, as well as the elderly and are ultimately fairly served by
When the man and boy meet people on the road, the boy has sympathy for them, but his father is more concerned with keeping them both alive. The boy is able to get his father to show kindness to the strangers (McCarthy), however reluctantly the kindness is given. The boy’s main concern is to be a good guy. Being the good guy is one of the major reasons the boy has for continuing down the road with his father. He does not see there is much of a point to life if he is not helping other people. The boy wants to be sure he and his father help people and continue to carry the fire. The boy is the man’s strength and therefore courage, but the man does not know how the boy worries about him how the boy’s will to live depends so much on his
Due to their surroundings, most children become what they see. If they see all the adults smoking marijuana freely around them, of course they’re going to think it’s okay to smoke marijuana. They believe with marijuana being illegal, it should be impossible for them to smoke weed. Once the child smokes illegal drugs, they’re no longer seen as innocent. They’ll be punished severely for their actions.
The author of this short story, Sandra Cisneros used this myth to make herself different from other American writers. She used ideas from things and stories she heard growing up as a Mexican-American woman, living in a house full of boys that got all of the attention (Mathias). Cisneros also grew up in the 19...
David Sheff starts the story of his family with Nic’s birth and goes all the way long to the present days when his son had survived several years of drug abuse, rehabilitations and relapses. Sheff confesses that his son started to use different kinds of drugs when he was very young. At the age of 11 he would try alcohol and some pot. “In early May, I pick Nic up after school one day …When he climbs into a car I smell cigarette smoke. I lecture him and he promises not to do it again. Next Friday after school…I am packing an overnight bag for him and look for a sweater in his backpack. I do not find a sweater, but instead discover a small bag of marijuana.” (Sheff, 200...
Junot Diaz's short story “Fiesta, 1980” gives an insight into the everyday life of a lower class family, a family with a troubled young boy, Yunior and a strong, abusive father, Papi. The conflict, man vs. man is one of the central themes of this story. This theme is portrayed through the conflicts between Papi and his son. Papi asserts his dominance in what can be considered unfashionable ways. Unconsciously, every action Papi makes yields negative reactions for his family. Yunior simply yearns for a tighter bond with his father, but knows-just like many other members of his family-Papi’s outlandish ways hurts him. As the story unfolds it becomes obvious that the conflicts between Papi and himself-along with conflicts between Yunior and himself-affect not only them as individuals, but their family as a whole.
This essay will concentrate on the comparison and analysis of two communist figures: Mao Zedong, leader of the Communist Party in China, and Joseph Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union. The main focus of this paper will be to explore each figure’s world view in depth and then compare and contrast by showing their differences and similarities.
With assertive shouts and short tempers, the prominent character, Ricardo, is characterized as a feisty townsman, doing nothing except trying to protect his town and its members from the judgments of the western world. For example, the characterization of the “‘…quaint’” man is exemplified through the simplicity of his life and the fact that he is “‘…employed’” and is full of knowledge, not a “‘cow in the forest’” (55, 29, 32). Ricardo desperately wants to establish the notion that he is not a heartless, feebleminded man, only an indigent, simple man striving to protect his friends and family from the criticisms of callous cultures. Incessantly Ricardo attempts to make it clear to the photographer the irritation elicited by his prese...
Drugs is one of the themes in this story that shows the impact of both the user and their loved ones. There is no doubt that heroin destroys lives and families, but it offers a momentary escape from the characters ' oppressive environment and serves as a coping mechanism to help deal with the human suffering that is all around him. Suffering is seen as a contributing factor of his drug addiction and the suffering is linked to the narrator’s daughter loss of Grace. The story opens with the narrator feeling ice in his veins when he read about Sonny’s arrest for possession of heroin. The two brothers are able to patch things up and knowing that his younger brother has an addiction. He still buys him an alcoholic drink at the end of the story because, he has accepted his brother for who he really is.
JJ is a 7 year old boy. He has post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder and impulse control disorder. He has been thrown out of numerous preschools and admitted to several hospitals for psychiatric issues. His mother has pursued all forms of medical and behavioral help for her son’s hyperactivity and aggressiveness. She came across medical marijuana while trying to research JJ’s problems and after discussing it with his doctors decided to give it a try. She took him off all his medications and put the marijuana in a muffin in amounts prescribed and monitored by the doctor. JJ’s behavior issues declined almost immediately. He is polite, eager to learn and interacts well with teachers and students at school. Now he talks through his questions and problems instead of acting out due to frustration. Marijuana has been used by people throughout the centuries and its use has provided many benefits. Therefore, it should be legalized for medical and recreational use in today’s society (O’Brien & Clark, 2002).
In our society today, a big debate has emerged. People are squabbling, arguing, deliberating and discussing on whether Marijuana should be legalized. In the United States, this debate is amplified because people think that illegalizing the substance does not fight its illicit use but only makes it more available and easily accessible. It also makes it “as a cool recreation drug” (Pi, 2007) for the young people. “It is actually easier for many high school students to obtain Marijuana than it is for them to obtain alcohol, because alcohol is legal and therefore regulated to keep it away from kids” (Marijuana, 1999). Debate about legalization of the drug is a significant issue that is socially important to our community and it should be analytically discussed in length. I personally believe that legalizing the drug across the United States of America would help fight its usage and save us a lot of cash (Marijuana, 1999).
Aside from the violence and costly attempts of control that accompany drug trade, there are severe social implications of the U.S war on drugs. One of the major social topics today is that of Marijuana use and punishment in America. Since 1937, over 26 million Americans have been arrested for Marijuana use. [2] The effects and harms are still debated today, yet many people serve time in jails and prisons, waiting to be released with criminal record that will follow them for the rest of their life. Further, those incarcerated are represented by a disproportionate amount ...
The use of drugs and mind-alternating substances has been a part of society for decades. The ‘high’ that people attain from the use of such substances is very attractive and exciting however, the effects of this use are minimized. Particularly for youth, a group of individuals who are seeking independence and experimentation, drug use represents the balance between taking risks and taking responsibility for one’s actions. However, the developmental processes of adolescents are known to not encompass the maturity required to fully think through such decisions. As such, the use of a ‘smaller-scale’ drug like marijuana is even more minimized. The purpose of this paper is to discuss what the risks of using marijuana are for youths, why they are the most affected, how this problem has progressed over the last three decades, and what preventative measures and treatment options are in place. It will also discuss what schools, parents, and government agencies could be doing to help improve the issue, and the impact that this issue is having on society.
Gabriel García Márquez is arguably Latin America’s most well known writer and socialist with Marxist ideals. His short story, Balthazar’s Marvelous Afternoon, is one that well exemplifies a few ideals of Marxism, without enforcing a political agenda, something only the greatest writers can achieve. One concept of Marxism is that capitalism can only thrive on the exploitation of the working class. This leads to economic conflict which creates class tension, this type of disputation is prevalent within Balthazar’s Marvelous Afternoon. To begin, the setting of the story is not clear, it is assumably in a small town since everyone is familiar with one another and the titles and careers of the characters are exposed in the story. One can also assume