Comparing Marx And Hagel's Manifesto

1704 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Positives and negatives on the marxism perspective

THE TODAY OF HISTORY: ACTIONS AND IDEAS OF MANKIND HITHERTO.

“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.”
Karl Marx and Frederick Engels begin their Manifesto of the Communist Party with these words. Karl Heinrich Marx was a German philosopher, economist and a revolutionary sociologist. His works have formed the basis of various social and economic theories. Karl Marx, is known throughout the world for being the proponent of an ideology, which has shook the very foundations of world politics and economics: Communism. But all that Marx envisaged about the future of mankind stems from his views about the history of mankind. Karl Marx as means to understand our past and learn about the course of our future …show more content…

History, Hagel argued, is a dynamic process in which a dominant idea or the thesis is opposed by an anti thesis, which is another idea. The confrontation of the thesis and the anti thesis produces a third way – a synthesis. Here, the two opposing ideas are reconciled and the combination contains the elements of the original ideas in a way, which would lead to the advancement of the mankind in some manner. One of the key theories in Hagel’s dialectic is that mankind is separated or alienated from the Absolute, and the historical process is man’s gradual movement towards the Absolute, or, in Hegel’s mind, God (Shimp, …show more content…

By diving into the past, Marx observed a rudimentary pattern in the events and their outcomes. Of course, historical materialism cannot explain the past to the very last detail, but it for sure provides a broad framework of the same. But this fact in no way diminishes the strength of the theory. It is perfectly acceptable to agree with the principles of historical materialism without accepting the utopian vision of a future communist society (Runciman, 1983). Karl Marx’s message to humanity is quite clear – if we were to, in true sense, achieve freedom and equality, both economic and social, for all of mankind, then collective ownership and democratic control of all the resources and means of production is

Show More
Related

  • Inequality In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

    430 Words  | 1 Pages

    Marx sees history as a struggle between classes: “Oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended, either in a revolutionary re-constitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes” (Marx and Engles 14).

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Karl Marx's Writing Of The Communist Manifesto

    2472 Words  | 5 Pages

    Karl Marx 's writing of ‘The Communist Manifesto’ in 1848 has been documented by a vast number of academics as one of the most influential pieces of political texts written in the modern era. Its ideologically driven ideas formed the solid foundation of the Communist movement throughout the 20th century, offering a greater alternative for those who were rapidly becoming disillusioned and frustrated with the growing wealth and social divisions created by capitalism. A feeling not just felt in by a couple of individuals in one society, but a feeling that was spreading throughout various societies worldwide. As Toma highlights in his work, Marx felt that ‘capitalism would produce a crisis-ridden, polarized society destined to be taken over by

    Read More

  • The Communist Manifesto

    561 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Marx is living in a world he is not happy with, and seems to think that he has the perfect solution. I am a strong believer in his ideas. We are living in a time period with a huge class struggle. The Bourgroise exploits and the proletariat are being exploited. Marx did not like the way this society was and searched for a solution. Marx looked for “universal laws of human behavior that would explain and predict the future course of events" (36). He saw an unavoidable growth and change in society, coming not from the difference in opinions, but in the huge difference of opposing classes. He speaks of his ideal society and how he is going to bring about this utopia in his book The Communist Manifesto. I am going to share with you more on his ideas of this “world-wide revolution” (36) that would put an end to social classes and allow people to live with equal sharing which would result in a harmonious and much peaceful world.

    Read More

  • two ways of looking at history

    938 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Marx and Fredrick Engel are considered as the most influential figure in the history for the work in preparation of the Communist Manifesto during the revolution period in Europe. The manifesto was an analysis of the emergence of the concept of capitalism and industrial development. The aim of advocating for a communist society was to overthrow capitalism, which was prevalent in Europe, and overthrow it and adopt a communist society. They were right in advocating for a Communist society, a way of assisting and empowering worker to take over enterprises and the reins of the government, which was apparently under the hands of few people who were the owners of the factors of production. Their work was to describe a new society on the basis of their industrial revolution and describe inequality relationship that was prevalent among different social classes .

    Read More

  • The Gnostic Gospels

    2152 Words  | 5 Pages

    Kung, Hans. The Incarnation of God: An Introduction to Hegel's Theological Thought As Prolegomena to a Future Christology. T&T Clark, 2001. hard cover.

    Read More

  • Brave New World Marxist Analysis

    779 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Marx was a nineteenth century, German philosopher, economist, a revolutionary socialist whose philosophy known as Marxism became the foundation of communism. ”Despite Karl Marx stating social classes are the

    Read More

  • Comparing Marx and Freud

    901 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marx views history as being determined by economics, which for him is the source of class differences. History is describe in The Communist Manifesto as a series of conflicts between oppressing classes and oppressed classes. According to this view of history, massive changes occur in a society when new technological capabilities allow a portion of the oppressed class to destroy the power of the oppressing class. Marx briefly traces the development of this through different periods, mentioning some of the various oppressed and oppressing classes, but points out that in earlier societies there were many differentiations of social classes. Marx sees the modern age as being distinguished from earlier periods by the simplifications of the class conflict, splitting up society into two great hostile groups: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Karl Marx and Max Weber

    568 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marx’s perspective was not based on the conflict of ideas, but rather on the conflict of classes. This conflict is the results of a new mode of production. According to Marx, history would consist of epochs of modes of production. He states that these modes of production are: primitive communism, slave society, feudalism, capitalism, and then socialism and communism.

    Read More

  • Differentiating Marx and Rousseau

    2202 Words  | 5 Pages

    In his Manifesto of the Communist Party Karl Marx created a radical theory revolving not around the man made institution of government itself, but around the ever present guiding vice of man that is materialism and the economic classes that stemmed from it. By unfolding the relat...

    Read More

  • Consciousness In Karl Marx's The German Ideology

    870 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Marx 's famous; The German Ideology opens with a detailed summary on the Hegelian tradition 19th century idealist German philosophers. The Hegelian philosophers focused on consciousness. Marx distinguishes from himself with earlier historians, particularly Hegel, who insisted on the predominance of the idea in their understandings of history. Consciousness is considered to be from the beginning a social product and remains so as long as men exist. Karl Marx distinguished several theories on the creation of consciousness enabling mankind to better understand the society that they are a part of. He defined consciousness as the knowledge of knowing something; which was created by humans in order to understand their environment in which

    Read More

  • Communist Manifesto Analysis

    970 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’ The Communist Manifesto explores class struggles and their resulting revolutions. They first present their theory of class struggle by explaining that “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” (Marx 14), meaning that history is a repeated class struggle that only ends with a revolution. Marx and Engels’ message in The Communist Manifesto is that it is inevitable for class struggles to result in revolutions, ultimately these revolutions will result in society’s transition to communism.

    Read More

  • Rousseau's Theory Of Alienation

    1222 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marx, in his theory of historical materialism, advocates that political and historical events result from the conflict of social forces. His theory focuses on the class struggles and the human attempts to control and dominate the natural environment. Profits obtained by the capitalists are a result of the workers being exploited. This conflict will lead to a revolution in which the workers control the state. Thus, capitalism will be replaced by socialism. The result is freedom for all. In the Soviet Union, the lower class overthrew the ruling class and created a new mode of production. This new economic base then determined political, social and ideological changes in its society. The failure of the Soviet Union impacts the validity of Marxian historical materialism because it discredits materialistic

    Read More

  • Analysis on Marx’s Historical Materialism

    1246 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marx defined historical materialism in the preface of A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy that, “it is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, on the contrary, their social existence that determines their consciousness.” In contrast to idealism, which prioritized the value of human ideas, historical materialism insisted that the existence of human kinds pushed the productions; and mode of production shaped human consciousness in return. The contradictory between Idealism and historical materialism lie between whether it was evolvement of consciousness steering for societal changes or the other way around. While choosing one of them as individual political philosophy, it was very similar of answering question, “which came first, chicken or egg?” Personally, I favor for historical materialism for “consciousness is determined by your beings” seems rational as well as logical.

    Read More

  • The Sociological Contribution of Karl Marx to an Understanding of Contemporary Society

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    Now his work has also to a great extent the political forces of today all of which his work inspired. In my point of view it is no exaggeration to say that of all theorists of society Karl Marx is a revolutionary. and has deeply touched and affected all our lives. Our modern political field reflects his ideologies and is under much of his influence. The snare of the snare.

    Read More

  • Marxism And Marxism

    1266 Words  | 3 Pages

    Politics and many aspects of society today have been heavily influenced by political thinkers and scholars from ages before our time. Whether their ideas were implemented or avoided, society today has learned and grown from these influenced; there has been societal adaptions and changes with every success and failure. One important philosopher that is still widely talked about today is Karl Marx. His theories and ideas are still studies, discussed and utilized today. Some aspects of Marxism is relevant to modern day but there are still some major critiques to his opinions that prove there in inconsistencies with the relevance of Marxism. This is a result of his failure to predict how advanced and revolutionized society would be in modern day.

    Read More

More about Comparing Marx And Hagel's Manifesto

Open Document