Comparing Marie De France 'Laustic And Susan Glaspell Trifle'

812 Words2 Pages

In Brian Sutton’s article, it summarizes the similarities in Marie de France “Laustic” and Susan Glaspell “Trifle.” “Laustic” derived from medieval literature around the twelfth century. This story mostly seen in the Norton Anthology of Western Literature. The short play “Trifle,” is birthed around the twentieth-century during the women’s right movement. Although both works come from different parts of literature, their theme reflects each other. When comparing their works, they both depict that wives have been oppressed and devalued by their husbands. The women significantly suffer from the lack of companionship, as well as depression. As a result, they are not satisfied with their homes and searched for a way to escape the madness.
The strange thing about this woman is that she appears to be married. She secretly dates the knight and becomes fascinated by his charms. She falls head over hills in love with the knight. The husband suspects the wife of being unfaithful in the marriage. So, he becomes jealous and obsessive which eventually leads him to monitor her every movement. Due to the fact, she is observed attentively; she is unable to date her secret lover. So, every night the woman would go to the window and secretly lays eyes on the man who she loves. The husband wanted to know why she spent so much time at the window every night. The wife explains to her husband the reason she goes to the window is to listen to “the beautiful sound of the nightingale.” (Sutton171) The husband suspects the wife is dishonest and he not oblivious to the fact that she continues to see the knight. The husband ordered his servant to set out traps to capture the bird. So, his servant catches the bird and return it back to him. “The husband takes the bird to his wife and before her eyes he killed it out of spite breaking its neck with his hands.” (Sutton 171) The blood from the bird splatters over her chest (Sutton 172). The woman is immensely saddening and depressed over her husband actions. She takes the slaughtered bird, wraps it up and sends it to the knight. The knight receives the bird and places it
Wright who is convicted of killing her husband. Mrs. Wright and her husband lived on an “isolated farm.” (Sutton 171) Mr. Wright was so cold-hearted that all of Mrs. Wright’s friend avoided being around her. Mrs. Wright was not happy at home, in fact, she was miserable. Due to her loneliness, she built an intense relationship with a canary bird. The canary bird gave her comfort and helped alleviate the pain she endured in her household. When Mr. Wright died, Mrs. Wright felt liberated and relieved. His death was gruesome, and he died with a rope around his neck. During the murder investigation, the women, Mrs. Hale, and Mrs. Peter found damning evidence to solve the case of the crime. They discovered the empty bird cage and noticed that the bird was gone. When they finally found the bird, it was dead, and its neck appeared

Open Document