Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on symbolism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When people read books, they often get into them and some can even change their views on life. Certain books can have assertainable stories that are strongly appealing to others mentality. If a person is going through a problematic period and they read a book where the main character is in a predicament that is similar, that reader might connect to that book/literary piece and it may transform their views on life and the world around them. With the literature that I have read this semester, there were times where they made me think about life and how it truly is. Some of them even made be see the world and society differently. The two literary pieces that we read this semester that changed my observation of the world was William Goldings book, the Lord of the Flies, and Henrik Ibsens playwrite, A Doll’s House. When I finished reading William Goldings, the Lord of the Flies, I actualized two things; …show more content…
Torvald after he confronts Nora about the letter, he tells her that they can go on living a regular life to society even though they have this problem and it will never be the same with their relationship again. This message in the play makes me aware that people’s mental psychology can trick them into believing different things when all they want is to look good for society. An example of my awareness is if an individual has a terrible life at home, where they get abused by their parents and don’t eat often, but they tell their friends that their family just went on vacation and they had a huge dinner with their family. It is upsetting to actually grasp this because the people that you pass on the sidewalk or at work, may be just like this and you would never
In the play, the audience sees it from Nora’s perspective. Nora is Torvald’s little squirrel, his little, insignificant squirrel. Nora is worthless to Torvald and she only realizes in the end how foolish she is to think that he will
Title Sir William Golding has constantly been a man who sees nothing good in anything. He examined the world to be a dreadful place due to the people who has populated the Earth. In order to display how he observes the world which was around the period of the second world war, he came to the decision of producing a novel. His novel was titled “Lord of the flies”. In the novel, William Golding familiarized his audience with three groups of boys; the hunters, the younger children and the gentle boys.
William Golding's Lord of the Flies "In 'Lord of the flies' Golding is clearly seeking to explore
The novel “Lord of the Flies” was written by William Golding to demonstrate the problems of society and the sinful nature of man.
Lord of the Flies provides one with a clear understanding of Golding's view of human nature. Whether this view is right or wrong is a point to be debated. This image Golding paints for the reader, that of humans being inherently bad, is a perspective not all people share. Lord of the Flies is but an abstract tool of Golding's to construct the idea of the inherent evil of human nature in the minds of his readers. To construct this idea of the inherent evil, Golding employs the symbolism of Simon, Ralph, the hunt and the island.
"The cost of freedom is always high. One path we shall never choose is the path of surrender and submission." - John F. Kennedy. Often in works of literature protagonists must overcome obstacles throughout their life/story. The Book of Negroes by Lawrence Hill and A Doll 's House by Henrik Ibsen are no stranger to this story telling design. It is clearly composite within The Book of Negroes as well as A Doll 's House that the protagonists of both works run through a parallel of obstacles which lead them both to the same hierarchical understanding, and end. Throughout both works it becomes evident that Aminata and Nora are both being suppressed by outside figures. As the stories progresses, it becomes more apparent to the reader that both Aminata and Nora are not genuinely satisfied with their lives. When it is realized by the protagonists that their
Torvald is the typical husband of the time of the play. He tries to control his wife and expect her to submit to him. He manipulates her through many different ways. First, he calls her pet names such as "little lark" (3) and "squirrel" (4) and speaks to her in a condescending tone, as if she is a child. He then tries to control her habits so he will not let her eat sweets or spend too much money. In fact, all the money she gets comes from him. He demands that she is subservient and treats her as almost a dog later on in the play. At the end, when Nora's secret is out, he lashes out at her and kicks her out of the house. When he wants her back after he realizes that he will no longer get into trouble for what she did, she does not want to come back, he finally realizes that she does not love him anymore and that his manipulation of her is over. This leaves him in a pickle because he now has to take care of his children without Nora, hardly a good position for him.
To start, Torvald’s definition of “human being” is someone who does what they are told and are submissive to authority. During the 1800’s, men were the primary leader of a household, and this book demonstrates this well. Torvald is very fixated with keeping up an image of class and sophistication, and he runs his family to be “human beings” under his definition by only allowing certain things. At the beginning of the story, Nora is secretly eating macaroons because if Torvald knew, he would discard them immediately. He desires a wife who is “perfect” in looks and mannerisms because that portrays the image of the quintessential family. He also avoids providing h...
Works Cited Golding, William. The. Lord of the Flies. New York: Coward-McCann, 1962. Print.
This primarily highlights Nora’s all-encompassing love for Torvald that allows her to believe in him despite his subtle flaws, underscoring the irony of her viewpoint as Torvald utterly fails to act selflessly in the end of the play. Moreover, Nora emphasizes to Krogstad that “[he’ll] see, [he’ll] see,” depicting her trust in her husband to stand resolute against Krogstad’s threat (88). From this, Nora’s belief only further promotes the irony of the situation, as Torvald quickly succumbs to selfish desires and immediately sacrifices Nora instead of himself when presented with Krogstad’s demands. With the entire conversation highlighting Krogstad’s complex character and Nora’s blind faith, the play portrays Krogstad as a potential foil for Nora, as both committed the crime of forgery, and Krogstad depicts Nora’s possible future where she, due to her crime and disillusionment with her husband, now looks down upon those who act like
Moreover, Nora emphasizes to Krogstad that “[he’ll] see, [he’ll] see,” depicting her trust in her husband to stand resolute against Krogstad’s threat (88). From this, Nora’s belief only further promotes the irony of the situation, as Torvald quickly succumbs to selfish desires and immediately sacrifices Nora instead of himself when presented with Krogstad’s demands. With the entire conversation highlighting Krogstad’s complex character and Nora’s blind faith, the play portrays Krogstad as a potential foil for Nora, as both committed the crime of forgery, and Krogstad depicts Nora’s possible future where she, due to her crime and disillusionment with her husband, now looks down upon those who act like Torvald. As hints of Krogstad’s moral nature reveal themselves to the audience beneath other character’s demeaning insults about his character, the play presents him not as a stock villain, but as a mirror of a feasible future for the protagonist, contributing complex characterization that adds realism to the overall
"Review: Second look at William Golding's 'Lord of the Flies'." All Things Considered 29 Mar. 2004.Literature Resource Center. Web. 8 May 2014.
People in the novels Brave New World, A Tale of Two Cities, and the play A Doll House show similar interests about becoming individuals and wanting freedom from a dominate figure in their life, and those characteristics seemed to be a repeating pattern among all three books. Respectively, each book has a sort of uprise from the oppressed demanding the authoritative husband, nation, and even society to provide that party a better life unlike the one they live presently. From A Tale of Two Cities the Marquis explains, “Repression is the only lasting philosophy, the dark deference of fear and slavery...will keep the dogs obedient to the whip” (A Tale of Two Cities p. 128) and this is what I challenge. If repression is the only lasting philosophy,
The ability to create characters of depth plagues many a contemporary writer. Many of those writers should look to William Golding for expertise on this issue. Golding diverges from the path of contemporary authors and sets an example of how character development should be accomplished in his novel, Lord of the Flies. Golding's Ralph exemplifies this author's superior style of character development in this novel.
Lastly, the amount of deception and dishonesty between Nora and Torvald would have broken the marriage even without Krogstad’s extortion plot. Both Nora and Torvald are living in a world of lies, and both of them are not honest with each other and themselves. In the beginning of the play, Torvald and Nora are portrayed to be a perfect couple with a perfect life. Nora is seen returning home after a day of shopping and is greeted lovingly by her husband. Even though they seemed to have had some financial troubles in the past, Torvald just received a new job as a bank manager and everything seemed to be alright, but behind the scenes nothing was alright.