Comparing Hughes And Hurston

1017 Words3 Pages

Zola Neale Hurston and Langston Hughes are among the most revered and well-respected writers of the Harlem Renaissance. Harlem Renaissance is a transition period that took place in Harlem, characterized by cultural, social and inventive revolution between the ends of the First World War and in mid-1935. As such, the two writers existed during this period and excelled in writing similar themes portraying the events that took place then. Even though they covered the same issues such as racism, sexism, social injustices, and discriminations, more so against the blacks, their approaches and styles are radically different. For instance, Hurston and Hughes employ different approaches as regards depiction of African-American life the factor that makes them apart.
In his novel ‘Their Eyes Were Watching God’ Zora Neale Hurston talks about the kind of oppression and prejudice …show more content…

For instance, the poem “I Too, Sing America,’ Hughes talks about the oppression on racial grounds as experienced by the African Americans. In the poem, the protagonist complains about the unequal treatment he receives from the white, and thus an indication that the issue of racism dominates. Unlike Hurston, Hughes’ writings indicate some hope that the situation will eventually change for the better. For instance in the poem ‘I Too, Song America,’ the narrator hopes that the country will realize some transformation, which could restore equality and eliminate racism and other forms of prejudice (Rampersad). Nonetheless, the entire poem seems to depict America as a nation filled with racism and discrimination. Even though the two writers differ, one can note some commonalities, and thus an indication that the writers address the same issues. For instance, Hurston and Hughes affirm that the African Americans face discrimination on racism grounds, and thus making their lives miserable and

Open Document