Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative study of religion
Compare and contrast world religions
Comparative study of religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and The Creature have a long and tragic history, as creator and creation. Similar to this relationship, is the relationship between God and the fallen angel Lucifer who attempted to claim Heaven’s throne. In comparing both Victor and The Creature on the outside, there is little doubt that Victor would be similar to God and The Creature to Lucifer because of their creator and creation relationship. However, a closer analysis would show a great irony with the common associations of Victor to God and The Creature to Lucifer, as the inner personalities of the two simply do not match the relationship that God and Lucifer have. Ironically, Victor, the creator, has more in common with Lucifer, …show more content…
God’s creation, and the Creature, the creation, has more in common with God, the creator. The Creature believes himself to have fallen to evil and to have become a malignant devil like Lucifer, but The Creature could not be more wrong.
The Creature’s situation is closer to that of God than of Lucifer; comparing himself to something so sinful exemplifies his regret for his actions, something Lucifer never did. The Creature’s thoughts on page 213, when he compares himself to Lucifer, demonstrates that although the Creature truly believes himself to be evil, he shows a regret that the fallen angel Lucifer never demonstrates. Despite being a creation, the Creature’s situation follows that of God’s own history. Similar to God, there is no equal for the Creature, no being to match him in any way “But… the fallen angel becomes a malignant devil. Yet even that enemy of God and man had friends and associates in his desolation; I am alone” (pg 213). The Creature chooses to help the weaker and lesser beings around him, such as collecting firewood for DeLacey, Agatha, and Felix and helping the drowning girl, but each and every time the Creature provides aid, he is scorned, chased, and attacked due to his appearance, which is paralleled by how people believe God constantly helps humans but despite …show more content…
his help he is still scorned by atheists, other religions, and even some Christians and Jews. The Creature recognizes his own evil due to the innocent deaths he has caused, but just as God smited those associated with Lucifer and how sin cannot exist without the devil, the Creature killed those related to Victor, for the dreadful circumstances about the Creature’s creation. Mary Shelley was raised in an atheistic house, and married an atheistic man, needless to say, atheism has had a profound impact in Mary Shelley’s life; upon first inspection her inclusion of God and his parallel to the Creature in her novel does not match her upbringing. However, by further analysis, the Creature’s actions demonstrate Mary Shelley’s atheistic upbringing clearly, as the Creature’s choice to murder William Frankenstein was a choice that was crafted from rage. Simply hearing that William was related to Frankenstein caused the Creature to abandon his objective of raising the boy to become his friend and switch to trying to kill the boy for having an association with Victor. The Creature’s choices reflects Mary Shelley’s opinions of God’s actions during the flood, as God flooded the world to clear away the traces of Lucifer in humans, abandoning all hope of redemption for humans and smiting them for associating with the enemy. Mary Shelley’s portrayal of the Creature’s tragic path is of the characteristic of divinity, not evil, but the atheistic influence of Mary Shelley drove the Creature’s divinity to evil. Mary Shelley’s logic follows that if God is real and His flood be true then he would be a greater demon that Lucifer, for smiting those that simply associate with the enemy. The Creature, although fitted to match Mary Shelley’s version of a wicked God, does not match the situation of the fallen angel Lucifer, despite the similarities of their births. While the Creature’s existence does not entirely match the history of God, he does follow Mary Shelley’s atheistic perspective of God; there is an undeniably connection between the Creature and God in Frankenstein. That connection builds understanding of Mary Shelley’s outlook on Christianity and God, but does not provide any evidence towards the correctness of the Creature’s comparison to Lucifer. Similar to the Creature’s parallel, Victor does not perfectly parallel Lucifer.
However, through his disruption of natural laws and repeated acts of defiance against nature, an undeniably connection links Victor and Lucifer together. Lucifer’s tragic flaw, just like Victor, was hubris. Lucifer desired a greater and higher throne than even God as Lucifer said himself, “I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God; I will sit on the mount of assembly on the heights of Zaphon; I will ascend to the tops of the clouds, I will make myself like the Most High" (Isaiah 14:12-14). However, Lucifer’s defiance ended in failure; Lucifer was banished from God’s garden for his sins and left to suffer. Victor’s experiment defied God’s natural laws, and he was punished accordingly by the very Creature Victor defied the natural laws to create. Victor dreamed of reaching power over nature that only God himself controls, and just “like the archangel [Lucifer] who aspired to omnipotence, [Victor became] chained in an eternal hell” (p. 203). Victor understands the sin he has committed and is permanently condemned for his sins, as quoted by he, "I did confess, but I confessed a lie. I confessed, that I might obtain absolution; but now that falsehood lies heavier at my heart than all my other sins. The God of heaven forgive me! Ever since I was condemned, my confessor has besieged me; he threatened and menaced, until I almost began to think that I was the monster
that he said I was” (pg 84). Victor begs for absolution of the sins he has committed, and just as the fallen angel’s request for forgiveness goes unheeded, Victor is denied redemption for his crimes against God; Victor’s despair and act of remorse very much mimics the actions taken by the fallen angel’s punishment in the book of enoch, as “[Lucifer] will have neither rest nor mercy, nor the granting of any petitions, because of the wrong which [he has] taught, and because of all the works of blasphemy and wrong and sin which [he has] shown to the sons of men” (Enoch 13.2). Victor’s plight against nature bears a grand resemblance to Lucifer’s fight against God, for even the messages found in the punishments of Victor and Lucifer hold the same contents: those against God shall be severely punished. Innumerous pieces of evidence can be found that relates Victor to Lucifer, and the Creature to God, and this evidence clarifies that Lucifer’s comparison to Victor has a connection of greater coherence, than to that of the Creature. Thus, despite the obvious difference of creator and creation, the connection between Victor and Lucifer can be supported with substantial evidence that the Creature’s parallel to Lucifer simply does not contain. Victor Frankenstein paralleling the greatest creation, and the Creature paralleling the greatest creator, a greater example of irony would be difficult. Due to his appearance and acts of hatred against Victor, the Creature claims that he must surely resemble the fallen angel Lucifer, but the Creature’s actions against Victor held a greater correlation to God’s actions. In fact, Victor’s acts significantly resembles Lucifer’s actions, as his deeds against God’s natural realm were of the very same nature as the fallen angel himself. Thus, although the Creature’s malignity during his revenge against Victor do not match the conventional version of God that many people know Him by, Mary Shelley’s atheistic influence allows such a possible version of God to exist. In fact, one of Mary Shelley’s main messages in Frankenstein demonstrates displeasure with God’s harsh punishments for associating with the enemy, which is exemplified by the Creature’s murder of a sweet innocent child and a helpless sleeping woman. Mary Shelley portrays the Creature as someone who gives into their rage and hatred when something associates with Victor, which very much resembles an atheistic viewpoint of God and Lucifer. So by representing God as the Creature, Mary Shelley is able to drag down God’s divine aspect to show how his actions are influenced by human emotions through presenting him as a human-like being. Shelley’s parallel of Lucifer as Victor, and God as the Creature, demonstrates a unique, new perspective on the Christian God from the viewpoint of an atheist. The irony in analysis of parallels in Frankenstein is found in the fact that Victor, a great creator, parallels Lucifer, the greatest creation, while the Creature, a great creation, parallels God, the greatest creator.
rabbit’s gains him a lot of sympathy from the reader as it is the kind
In her novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley and the film Edward Scissorhands by Tim Burton their creations have a desire to be loved. Which leads them on a journey of acceptance for themselves and others. Everyone has felt the need to find why they are here on earth; we all search for answers we are no different from them.
1. He came like a protecting spirit to the poor girl who committed herself to his care.
Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, illustrates the Romantic idea of the sublime naturalworld as an emotional experience for the characters of the novel. Within the text, Shelleyutilizes an allusion to the John Milton’s biblical story, Paradise Lost, to make a parallel betweenthe characters. Within the passage, the monster compares himself, as well as his creator, Victor,to the characters Adam and Satan. He comes to realize that he is more similar to Satan;ultimately, leading him to his reign of terror and the revenge he wishes to impose on Victor. Themonster realizes that he is similar to Adam in Paradise Lost in that they both do not want to bealone. The monster also realizes that there is good in the world that is deeply contrasted with
The most important religious comparison in Frankenstein, are the outstanding similarities between Victor as God and the monster as Lucifer. This idea is proven by the monster in the quote where he states, " I am thy creature; I ought to be thy Adam, but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed." Broken down, this quote shows us that the monster feels that he is the neglected creation and that he has been created to be unhappy, although he has committed no wrongdoing, and he doesn't deserve to be mistreated by society. As it goes in the bible, God created Lucifer as the most brilliant and beautiful angel in the sky with good intentions, but Lucifer turned his back on his creator and began a notorious streak of evil as the "malignant devil." Now if the role of God is switched with that of Victor, and the role of Lucifer is switched with that of the monster, the story is retold in almost the same context. Now to prove that this is not just farfetched speculation, the monster even says in his quote that he ought to be Adam, God's successful creation, rather than the fallen angel (Lucifer). Among other quotes in which the monster deigns Victor as [his] creator, this is a powerful novel reference and this quote beautifully shows the direct motif of religious role-playing in Frankenstein.
Frankenstein is a fictional story written by Mary Shelly. It was later adapted into a movie version directed by James Whales. There are more differences than similarities between the book and the movie. This is because, the movie is mainly based on the 1920’s play, other than the original Mary Shelly’s book Frankenstein. A text has to be altered in one way or the other while making a movie due to a number of obvious factors. A lot of details from the book were missing in the movie, but the changes made by Whales were effective as they made the movie interesting, and successful.
Most Americans have some idea of who Frankenstein is, as a result of the many Frankenstein movies. Contrary to popular belief Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a scientist, not a monster. The "monster" is not the inarticulate, rage-driven criminal depicted in the 1994 film version of the novel. Shelley’s original Frankenstein was misrepresented by this Kenneth branagh film, most likely to send a different message to the movie audience than Shelley’s novel shows to its readers. The conflicting messages of technologies deserve being dependent on its creator (address by Shelley) and poetic justice, or triumph over evil (showed by the movie) is best represented by the scene immediately preceding Frankenstein’s monster’s death.
Mary Shelley's Presentation of the Relationship Between Frankenstein and the Creature 'It was on a dreary night of November that I beheld the accomplishment of my toils.' These are the famous words of Mary Shelley that foretold the birth of Frankenstein's monster. A tale of catastrophe, love and endless yet hopeless toil; the tale of Victor Frankenstein is a perfect example of early gothic literature. Born on a dreary summer in 1816, his story has been immortalised in not only the pages of many books but also on the silver screen. Like many of its genre, Frankenstein is a terrifically dark yet pioneering story.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and the monster that he creates are very similar. For example, Victor creates the monster to be like himself. Another similarity is that the anger of both Victor and the monster is brought about by society. One more parallel between Victor and the monster is that they both became recluses. These traits that Victor and the monster possess show that they are very similar.
The monster also made this same pact with himself that he would get back at his creator no matter what. He shows this is full effect when after Victor kills his "Eve" the monster goes and proceeds to kill victors wife.
..., this self-justification and rationalization is a way of him saying, I am justified, which is an innate human quality. This representation is very different from what most people are used to seeing, which results in the reader relating to him and viewing him as victim because we identify with him. The humanizing aspect of Satan in the poem to have an initial reaction and say I am wronged in this situation is identical with our innate reaction to similar incidents. Even though we are different than Satan in many ways, we usually do not take accountability when we are expected to. Thus, we sympathize with Satan in this poem because we also rely on self-justification to avoid taking blame for our wrong doings and accept that we are sometimes wrong. Hence, since we understand his situation due to the way it mirrors our human nature, we consider Satan to be a victim.
As creators of another creature, God and Victor Frankenstein are very similar, in that they both lose part of their "family," and they let the war between them and their creations go on too long. Victor says, " I collected bones from charnel houses; and disturbed, with profane fingers, the tremendous secrets of the human frame." This shows that he creates the monster out of corpses, just as God creates Satan. Furthermore, Victor is disgusted with his own creation, "the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart." Victor rejects the monster, similar to God's disgust with Satan's pride. The monster wreaks havoc on the Victor's life, "; I called myself the murderer of William, of Justine, and of Clerval," leaving him with a burden of guilt, just as God loses his angels to Satan, Victor loses his family and friends to the monster. Victor at some point feels even more guilt because he didn't destroy the monster earlier. If God could so easily order the fallen angels to be pushed out of Heaven, why did he let the war go on for three days? This truly is remarkable, two novels of different time periods, with characters of startling resemblance.
In the novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the Creature's only need is for a female companion, which he asks Victor Frankenstein his maker to create. Shelley shows the argument between the creature and Frankenstein. The creature says: "I demand a creature of another sex, but as hideous as myself " (Shelley 139). Shelley shows what the creature wants from Frankenstein and what his needs are. Shelley gives us an idea of the sympathy that Frankenstein might feel for the creature even though he neglects him. The creature confronts Victor demanding his attention and expressing his needs. I feel a lot of sympathy for the creature based on him being able to forgive Victor for abandoning him and being able to communicate with him.
In conjunction, Frankenstein “infuse[d] a spark of being in the lifeless” (Shelly 58) the same way that Prometheus gave fire to mankind. Both creators strove to make their beings the best they could and suffered for their achievements.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Robert Louis Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde reveal the links between the complexities of human nature and the procurement of knowledge. Humans are inevitability drawn to intelligence; their desire to reach beyond human capabilities in the pursuit of knowledge is a key theme within the novels. Shelley and Stevenson explore the human condition and its potential to create both illumination and destruction in efforts to pursue the path that fuels their fire. This is mirrored in Shelley’s presentation of Walton and Frankenstein as a doppelgangers, with both characters’ curiosity and insatiable thirst for knowledge proving to be a dangerous force. These figures term knowledge as a concept that