Comparing Data
As a piece of Statistics coursework, I have decided to compare two
items of data, in order to prove, or disprove my theory: "A country's
position in the Commonwealth games varies accordingly to that
country's population size."
My theory is that a country's position in something such as the
Olympics or Commonwealth Games is proportional to that country's
population size. I say this because I believe that if a country has a
large population, there will be more potential athletes to choose
from.
I am doing this because I would be genuinely interested in finding out
whether or not this theory is true, and I believe that it is a theory
that many people reading this essay would be curious in finding out.
In addition, I am comparing the results from the Commonwealth Games,
instead of something as renowned as the Olympic games because the
Commonwealth Games are dominated by countries with very different
traditions and cultures. Conversely, countries that dominate the
Olympic games are countries such as France, England, or Germany, and
are all countries that live a very western way of life similar to
ours.
In order to do the comparisons that I will need to make properly, I
will use three different occasions of the Commonwealth Games, and then
make an average for the number of medals awarded for each country. I
will use the most recent of games - 2002, 1998 and 1994. I will do
this, as the data collected from these three games, will contain the
data from each of the countries that enter, since in the first games
in 1930, only a fraction of the countries that enter now entered. I
will also use fifty different c...
... middle of paper ...
...bados
1
276,607
Jamaica
11
2,680,029
Anguilla
0
12,446
Grenada
0
89,211
Turks & Calcos
0
18,738
Trinidad & Tobago
2
1,163,724
Wales
21
2,903,085
Malta
0
397,499
Isle of Man
0
76,535
Gibraltar
0
27,714
Jersey
0
89,775
Northern Ireland
6
1,685,267
Cook Islands
0
20,811
Norfolk Islands
0
1,866
Niue
0
2,134
Vanuata
0
196,178
New Zealand
40
3,908,037
Solomon Islands
0
494,786
Nauru
8
12,329
Tuvalu
0
11,146
Fiji
2
856,346
Now I must compare this data. In order to this, I will do a scatter
graph.
Above is my original data. In the graph, it can be seen that there are
... a theory should be able to explain a wide variety of things, not just only what it was intended to explain.
Comparing Two Sources There are disagreements and agreements between source A and source B. Source A was from a report written by a journalist Humphrey Tyler, who worked for a South African magazine. The report was written later on the same day that the shooting occurred. Source B was from an English newspaper, published the day after the shooting. Source A and source B both agree and disagree with each other over different things.
There are many definitions to theory. According to Akers (2009) “theories are tentative answers to the commonly asked questions about events and behavior” (Akers, (2009, p. 1). Theory is a set of interconnect statements that explain how two or more things are related in two casual fashions, based upon a confirmed hypotheses and established multiple times by disconnected groups of researchers.
believes it. There are also a few objections to his theory that raise questions as to if it can
If I were to evaluate a theory and choose the one that I had to accept then I would take away something from all of the theories that we learned about. Theories are created through existing data. However, a theory may not necessarily be correct but it does give us a better understanding of concepts in that it gives people to either prove them correct or wrong. All in all, understanding is being created. Plus, our book stated that “the best available explanation of personality comes from using the best of all the theories rather than attempting to use one or a few of them” (531).
Essentially this theory states that a theory, once the hypothesis has been made, should go through rounds where the scientist must try to prove the hypothesis false, or null. If the scientist is unable to do so, then the theory must be true.
published the article stating this theory. He has since been discredited and it was recently
Therefore, I cannot agree with your conclusion even if some of your theory is solid.”
Both of their theories have similarities but as life keeps going they start to differ from each others theories. Parts of their theories have helped find the correct information for what actually happens in human life development.
Theory is based on the fact that for a reaction to take place, it is
There are two basic formats to Comparing or Contrasting two items. If one were to compare apples and oranges, for example, we would consider the fruits the items, and qualities such as flavor, color, texture, "juicability" and the like as the aspects.
If a theory is able to account for and predict the trends for many crimes, then it is more probable that it is true.
As you can see the theory I’m OK in, however it’s the synoptic ideas I
My null hypothesis is that there is no statistical difference in the ability of each treatment to relieve pain in an affected dog. My alternate hypothesis is that there is a statistical difference in the ability of each treatment to relieve pain in an affected dog. I conducted an unpaired t-test to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the mean length of medication use of the two treatments groups. This test is appropriate because I want to know whether the two population group means are different. I used degrees of freedom of 31 for this test because my total sample size was 33. There are three assumptions that have to be made to be able to use this test. The first is that the data in this study are independent