More handpicked essays just for you.
Short summary about nirvana
Introduction to hinduism and buddhism comparing and contrasting
Introduction to hinduism and buddhism comparing and contrasting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In both Hindu and Buddhist philosophies, they follow and focus on similar yet different concepts of liberating themselves from ‘Samsara’ and the suffering that comes with it. Samsara in both Hindu and Buddhist philosophies is the endless cycle of death and rebirth. So, the end goal is to work towards the enlightenment from this cycle. Though the two concepts are similar in that the goal is the same, the two have distinctive and important differences on how they view this “release” from the rebirth-death cycle; they both follow different paths to reach that end goal which, in basic terms, is to live a happy life. In Hinduism philosophy, the term used for the liberation from the cycle is known as Moksha. “Letting go” is quite literally the …show more content…
This is known as “nirvana”. Nirvana means the ending of all suffering; a state of supreme bliss. So, it is not only the release from samsara, it is the end of all suffering as well. Being that it is the highest level of the philosophy, it’s the goal of all followers. Since the goal is to reach this level of bliss, all anger, ignorance, and desire (called trishna) has to be eliminated. These feelings are the root of suffering for Buddhist followers. When these negative feelings and emotions are realized and eliminated, nirvana and the escape from the death and rebirth cycle would then be reached. It’s an inner-awakening of the self and a realization of what reality truly is, and it is then one becomes enlightened as a Buddha. Though both Hinduism’s moksha and Buddhism’s nirvana are more or less synonymous, they both hold distinctive differences in the path that leads followers to the end goal of enlightenment from samsara. In Hinduism, “letting go” or releasing from samsara by way of the realization that “atman is Brahman” is what moksha is defined as. Contrastingly, Buddhism involves extinguishing feelings that cause suffering and thus, achieving …show more content…
Eliminating all causes of “suffering” would not only be unenjoyable, but would be a long process. Whereas, when achieving nirvana, opportunities would arise continuously throughout the life and death cycle to have experiences with Brahman. In a world where distractions are quite literally heavily ingrained into everything we do and see (by way of advancements in technology, especially), I believe the difficulty of achieving the highest level of Buddhism that is nirvana, in comparison to Hinduism’s moksha, would be much greater. The traditions and values of Hinduism and Buddhism when speaking of the liberation of samsara hold many similarities and distinctive differences that highlight the values of both philosophies. Though the path to having a life full of happiness may be different, the end all goal of their respective ideals is to free themselves from the cycle of life and death and have a satisfying experience doing
By learning from the Dharma, understanding The Four Noble Truths, three jewels, living by the five precepts, and following the eightfold path will assist to the completed path of enlightenment. Nirvana, which means to extinguish or unbind, is when a Buddhist has reached a state in which he has gained knowledge and freedom from what ever has bound him from reaching nirvana. Whether it be passion, desire, jealousy, egotism, or ignorance. When nirvana has been reached then there will be complete release from the samsara and karmic cycles.
Buddhism’s approach to ethics and practices are centred upon the principal beliefs of; the Four Noble Truths, the Noble Eightfold Path and the Five Precepts. By adhering to these guidelines, Buddhists are ensured that they are taking a step closer to escaping Samsara, and attaining the revered state of Nirvana,
Similar to Hinduism, the cycle of rebirth is undesirable and life is marked by suffering in Buddhism (p.177). Suffering is referred to as dukkha and Buddhism seeks to end suffering through nirvana.While techniques vary, Buddhists share common core beliefs. Suffering is the problem and nirvana is seen as the
Buddhism teaches that humans have a repetitive cycle of birth, life, death, and rebirth. Each reincarnated life is decided into a better, worse, or a similar life, depending upon the person's Karma. The goal is to escape from this cycle and reach Nirvana, and once this is attained, the mind is free from suffering. Buddhism teaches a lesson through its followers in order to make them fully understand that one lives for a reason, which is to eliminate all their desires. Document 6 it quotes,
There are three motives followers of Buddhism have lesser, middling and great motivation. Mainstream Buddhism has middling motivation and Mahayana has great motivation. Mainstream Buddhism end goal for the majority of its followers is to become an arhat who is a worthy one or the small minority that want to become a Buddha. Mainstream Buddhist have been known to lead the more selfish path since their main goal is to achieve nirvana for one self and stay there. The path to either becoming an arhat or Buddha varies in length. Becoming a Buddha is said to have a more difficult and long journey than one of an arhat. Now Mahayana Buddhist follows the Bodhisattva Path, which can take up to an aeon to complete and when embarking on this path one first accepts the bodhisattva vow. A reason so many are motivated to accept the bodhisattva vow is to avoid bad karma and the penalties that come with it like the five realms of hell. The main goal in Mahayana Buddhism is to attain Buddhahood which, is when one does not reside in nirvana, they wish to pursue other realizations and they come back down out of nirvana to help other beings attain nirvana this is called a Bodhisattva. Since Mahayana Buddhist return from nirvana they remain in a state of samsara till the end. The nirvanas Mahayana and Mainstream
This paper is a comparison between two very different religions. Specifically Christianity and Buddhism. Coming from opposite sides of the globe these two religions could not be any farther apart in any aspect. I will discuss who Christ is for Christians and who Buddha is for Buddhists. I will also get into the aspects of charity, love, and compassion in both religions and I will be looking at the individual self and how christians see resurrection where the buddhists feel about the afterlife. One thing to keep in mind is that the two religions are very different but they seem to have a very similar underlying pattern. Both believe that there was a savior of their people, Buddha and Christ, and both believe that there is something good that happens to us when our time is done here on earth. This is a very generalized summarization but in order to go in to depth I need to explain the two religions more to fully convey this theory.
Buddhism and Hinduism share many similar beliefs. The idea of being reborn after death until one reaches a certain point to which they reach their Nirvana, or Moksha as they refer to the action of being set free of the life, death, rebirth cycle. Both of these religions share a belief in karma being one of the defining factors of a person’s place in the world. Similarly, both religions advocate for nonviolence against all living beings. In Hinduism and Buddhism there are many different levels of heaven and hell and higher or lower worlds. Each of these religions practice spiritual meditation, concentration, and cultivations of special states of mind. The idea of detachment, or the renunciation of worldly life being a precondition to enter the Nirvana or spiritual life is shared by both religions as well. Desire is considered to be the main cause of suffering of people and each religion aims to teach their followers to shed the want and desire out of their lives in order to get closer to attaining Nirvana. While there are many similarities in both religions, they each contrast each other in many ways as well.
Throughout the history of humankind, man has always searched to find answers to the many existential questions. Numerous different religions and denominations have developed around the world over time. Though, most wonder about the origin and purpose of our existence. Buddhism was founded on the teachings of Siddhartha Gautama about 2,600 years ago in India. After he had experienced that everyone was subject to “birth, sickness, death, and old age”, he tried to find a way to break from the cycle of rebirth (Bloom). Siddhartha Gautama experimented with a number of methods to find the cause of suffering which led him to what he called the Middle Way – a path between “licentiousness and extreme mortification” (Bloom). Once he achieved enlightenment, he turned into ‘the Buddha – the enlightened or awakened one’. Christianity is one of the largest and most prevailing religions of the world and largely based on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ. Christians trust that Jesus was sent by God to save humanity. Therefore, the faith of the followers of the Christian belief is primarily based on the preaching of Jesus and later the spreading of those by his disciples. Although Buddhism and Christianity show several parallels, their three key differences are that Buddhists do not believe in one divine being, and have different views about both the purpose of life and the concept of afterlife.
In modern times, both Hinduism and Buddhism are practiced by millions of people all around the world. Although Hinduism and Buddhism are practiced in different ways, they both share mutual ideas. For example, in both religions, they believe in the idea of Karma. According to Brodd et. al (2016) “Karma is the law of actions and their consequences.” (p.139). In each religion, Karma has a different meaning. In Buddhism, “karma is the law of actions and their consequences” (Brodd et. al, 2016, p.147). In Hinduism, “karma determines the nature of one’s incarnations in samsara” (Brodd et. al, 2016, p.147). Samsara is another important concept shared by both Hinduism and Buddhism. The concept of Samsara is defined as “The continuing cycle of birth,
Moksha is defined by Dictionary.com as freedom from the differentiated, temporal, and mortal world of ordinary experience. Moksha originated from the Sanskrit word mokṣa, meaning liberation or salvation. Moksha is one of the most basic principles of Hinduism. One must obtain Moksha if one wants to escape the cycle of reincarnation. Once one escapes the cycle of reincarnation they will know the Truth. And when one knows the truth, they will be one with God. Originally moksha was attainable in one’s life time, however the definition was changed. Because Hinduism does not have a central text or any organized and standardized principle the idea of moksha can change over time, and from person to person. The idea of moksha can be complex; it can also be very simple. That is why it has survived thousands of years.
230). There are two main “types” Buddhism that are practiced around the world. The first is Theravadin, and the second is Mahayana (Smith-Stoner, 2005, p. 228). Buddhism contains a “message of salvation” that considered the “Four Noble Truths” (Leming & Dickinson, 2011 p. 134). They are, the truth of suffering, the truth of the cause of suffering, the truth of the end of suffering, and the truth of the path that leads to the end of suffering. Leming and Dickinson (2011) describe how the combination of ethics and meditation are the eightfold path to enlightenment (Leming & Dickinson, 2011 p. 136). The author believes it is important for practitioners to recognize the increasing numbers of people practicing Buddhism in the United States in order to enhance their ability to care for end of life needs in this population. Smith-Stoner (2005) states that Buddhism is one of the fastest growing religions in the United States and that Colorado is one of the main population centers (Smith-Stoner, 2005, p. 229). In Buddhism, it is extremely important to be able to tame emotions and the mind which is done through meditation. The author thinks it is pertinent to know the
They define a state which is beyond the ordinary which can only be characterized by achieving a particular spiritual state. It is notable that Moksha is a common belief in the Hindu religion and it describes a state where one’s soul connects with god’s soul. On the other hand, it can be noted that Nirvana can be obtained by individuals who detached themselves from sin. However, it is clear that both require an individual to remain steadfast in their pursuit for spiritual liberation while abandoning the earthly life and desires. Reincarnation is a consequence of life that moksha and nirvana believers wish to avoid in order to overcome the suffering in the death and rebirth cycle, samsara. Hence, the practices have more similarities that
Unlike Hindus, Buddhist follow Buddha’s four noble truths. The four noble truths provide a pathway to enlightenment; they teach what causes suffering in life and how to stop it. The noble truths are very simple and easy to understand. The first truth is that all existence will suffer no matter what, the second truth is the understanding of craving, the third truth is the cessation of suffering, and the final truth is following the noble eightfold path. Practicing Buddhism isn’t complex or difficult, unlike Hinduism. As long as one gives love and acceptance to everyone and everything, is mindful, practices Ahimsa, and detaches themselves from materialistic items one can be a successful Buddhist. Unlike the simplicity of Buddhism, Hinduism is very strict and complex. It is male oriented and difficult to follow through. To practice Hinduism one must follow the four stages of life. The first stage is being a student and study the Vedas. The second stage is being a house holder; support a student and have a family. The third stage is being a Hermit; withdraw from family for many months and prepare to become an ascetic. Finally, the last stage of life is becoming an ascetic. These stages are only allowed to be done by men and an extremely small percent of
A comparative analysis of salvation in Christianity and Buddhism exposes stark contrasts between the grace of Jesus Christ and the self-saving action and enlightenment of Buddha. I attempt to compare the Christian and Buddhist concepts of salvation in this essay to emphasise on the significance of each founder's roles in salvation, and to extract similarities and differences between them both.
Hinduism lays out two paths one can take to fulfill the ultimate desires of mankind, the Path of Desire and the Path of Renunciation. However, only one path truly leads down the path to the true goal that all of mankind actually holds and the other path only leads to fleeting superficial feelings of happiness. It’s important to know which path leads to realizing and achieving which goals in order to have a satisfying and rewarding life. The Path of Desire is the path that ultimately leads to superficial feelings that fade with time, only leaving one to crave for more.