Comparing Brutus And Mark Antony

1106 Words3 Pages

Brutus and Mark Antony are both major characters in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Brutus is a supporter of the republic who believes strongly in a government guided by the votes of senators. While Brutus loves Caesar as a friend, he opposes the ascension of any single man to the position of dictator, and he fears that Caesar aspires to such power. Brutus’s inflexible sense of honor makes it easy for Caesar’s enemies to manipulate him into believing that Caesar must die in order to preserve the republic. While the other conspirators act out of envy and rivalry, only Brutus truly believes that Caesar’s death will benefit Rome. Unlike Caesar, Brutus is able to separate completely his public life from his private life; by giving priority to matters …show more content…

In his speech, Mark Antony says, "He was my friend, faithful and just to me." ... "My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause til it come back to me." He genuinely loved Caesar, as did Brutus. In Brutus' speech he says, "If there be any in this assembly, any dear of Caesars, to him I say that Brutus' love to Caesar was no less than his," ... "Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more." Another thing they have is common is that they both want to appeal to "Romans". For example, in his speech, Brutus says, "Be patient till the last. Romans, countrymen, and lover!" In Mark Antony's speech he says something similar, "Friends, Romans, countrymen, land me your ears,". Lastly, both are using persuasive techniques in the way they speak in their speeches. "Who here so rude that would not he a Roman?" Brutus says in his speech. It is irony Brutus is saying, "Who would be a traitor to Rome?". Mark Antony uses persuasive techniques by saying, "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. Did this of Caesar seem ambitious?", Mark Antony constantly refutes Brutus' claim of Caesar being ambitious by giving examples as to how he wasn't ambitious. He asked rhetorical …show more content…

Firstly, Mark Antony uses pathos to emotion in his speech, "And men have lost their reason. Bear with me; my heart is in the coffin there with Caesar," ... "O now you weep, and I perceive you feel the dint of pity. These are gracious drops, kind souls, what weep you when you but behold our Caesars vesture wounded? Look you here, Here is himself, marr'd as you see with traitors." In Brutus speech he uses the logos appeal to logic. Brutus says, "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect for mine honor, that you may honor, you may believe." He wants people to believe he is honorable, because it is what he believes. Brutus says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but I love Rome more." He believed Caesars death was for the better. "Had you rather Caesar were living, and all die, than that Caesar were dead to live all free men?" Brutus said in part of his speech, he said this because he wanted to convince the people that Caesars death meant something. On the other hand, Mark Antony disagreed. He wanted to rally the crowd about Caesar's death, by using emotions against them. Although he may not have said go burn the traitors but he did make them feel the way they did for them to do it. He says, "You all did love him once, not without cause. What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?" Brutus believed Caesar's death was for the better of Rome, "Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar

Open Document