Comparing Beowulf, Sir Gawain And The Canterbury Tales

1040 Words3 Pages

A quote from the great Robert Louis Stevenson says, “All human beings are commingled out of good and evil.” While many people in the world today would definitely agree with this, it is unclear how people during the Anglo-Saxon era and Middle Ages would think about this. Since we obviously cannot ask a living person from these time periods what they think about this, we can analyze their literature to discover what the common man thought so many years ago. The classic literature I have personally analyzed on this topic are as follows: Beowulf, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, and The Canterbury Tales. The first listed is an epic from the Anglo-Saxon time period, while the latter two are both stories from the Middle Ages. After thorough readings of the texts, it has become clear to me …show more content…

The author took an odd approach to describing the beast that took down our brave hero; the author barely even describes the dragon. All we can gather is that the dragon is a massive reptilian beast that breathes fire and is laying waste to Beowulf’s land. From this, the dragon is obviously completely evil, since there is not even a single description of the beast that gives him ny quality of goodness. This makes the third character from the Anglo-Saxon time period that is obviously either good or evil. In major contrast, we get the Middle Ages perspective of people. Another great example from The Canterbury Tales is the Skipper. He is an extremely skilled sailor, and “from Hull to Carthage there was none as great.” Chaucer seems to respect this character, and you could even go as far to say that Chaucer is fond of him. However, the Skipper is a rascal who stole wine from a sleeping captain’s cargo. He also appears to have a tendency to steal at times. So, once again, we have a character who is neither good or evil, but a mixture of both. This extra little bit of character depth helps us to relate to the story

Open Document