Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of minimum wage essay
History of minimum wage essay
History of minimum wage essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Comparing and Contrasting Holland and Patton’s Essays President Roosevelt signed the minimum wage act into law on June 25, 1938 as part of the Fair Labor Standards (PD). Minimum wage is a topic sweeping the country; some citizens want the minimum wage to increase while others want it to stay the same. Essays written by Joshua Holland and Mike Patton attempt to persuade readers into believing their side of the minimum campaign argument. Both Holland and Patton try to persuade the reader with facts concerning the minimum wage in their essays to support their view, they use different ways of approaching the subject such as their position and writing style. Both authors of the essay concepts of the subject matter is the same, they both are focused on the matter of minimum wage, influencining the reader by using facts to persuade the audience to agree with their opinions. In both essay’s Holland and Patton present both sides of the argument, for and against. Both writers quoted other sources, so the reader maybe encouraged conducting more research and seeking other opinions. Although both pieces of writing are persuasive, the essay by Joshua Holland was writing advanced style compared the essay written by Mike Patton. Holland gave facts that supported his opinion. He used argumentative words such as “ …show more content…
another argument, opponents also claim and but those .”He stayed on the topic and focused on minimum wage and did not stray to another issue. The reader is aware of Holland’s view throughout the entire composition because he did not sway from his analysis on the subject. The essay by Mike Patton was difficult for the reader to follow.
He stated his opinion with little facts to back his point. His idea’s jumped all over the place and he talked about a few things that were not about the topic of minimum wage. As an example, he wrote a paragraph concerning welfare does not help the U.S economy and minimum wage is not mentioned. . He confuses the reader, after he has made all his justifications concerning the topic by stating “Personally, I have no dog in the hunt. Although I do have an opinion after examining the facts, I have not bias on the matter” This statement leaves the reader bewildered and undecided on the authors
view. After reviewing both essays, the reader will discover two different writing styles from two different authors. One author, Holland writes a well developed, thought out essay concerning the subject of minimum wage and its effects on the lives and business in America. The author influences the reader with facts, statistics and does not focus on the history of wages, but gets to the point of the subject matter. The other author, Patton begins his essay, with the history of minimum wage, repeating himself several times. He also quotes facts and statistics but does not share his real opinion. He sometimes agrees with the subject, while other times he disputes the idea, leaving the reader baffled. Although there are many similarities between the essays, each composition has its own unique point of view of the topic of minimum wage. The essay by Holland was written at a more sophisticated level than that of the essay written by Patton.
Many people against raising the minimum wage create arguments such as, “it will cause inflation”, or, “ it will result in job loss.” Not only are these arguments terribly untrue, they also cause a sense of panic towards the majority working-class. Since 1938, the federal minimum wage has been increased 22 times. For more than 75 years, real GDP per capita has consistently increased, even when the wage has been
His conclusion, life is not fair. Boobie Miles, for example, is a High School student who has dedicated his life to football.... ... middle of paper ... ...
He makes some very valid points pertaining to the zero tolerance policy practiced by schools and how it has a negative effect on children in our school systems and essentially pushes them into our juvenile and prison systems. I am a firm believer that the zero tolerance does nothing good for students in school. In my mind it completely goes against everything our schools supposedly stand for. We tell kids to go to school to learn, but the first time they break a rule we suspend them and send them home or even worse we expel them for the entire year. I just don’t see how that isn’t setting kids up for failure down the road and neglecting them of a quality education. One statistic the author presented that really caught me off guard was when they said that when someone is suspended or expelled even once in their entire time in school their chances of ending up behind bars is increased at a rate of five times than that of someone who doesn’t get suspended or expelled. This made me really reflect on how many friends I had in high school that were suspended and ultimately flunked out. It made me wonder if the system truly wasn’t there for them to help them get an
4. He refutes the first argument of college grads making more money by saying that the job pool for college graduates is getting smaller because more people go to college, and a lot of college graduates still take lower paying jobs. He doesn’t refutes the second argument that said colleges are more about enlightening students rather than employing them. He simply just stated that it is a deception. I don’t think his refutations are effective because instead of giving facts to back up his argument he gave mostly opinions, or specific scenarios that might not apply to all people.
In conclusion, I felt that this column was written as a piece of trickery. It was devised to fool average people into agreement. I also felt that anyone with mild intelligence and critical reasoning skills could easily punch an incalculable number of holes in his arguments. So, did he achieve his goal? I believe that this piece of writing could easily win over half of the U.S population, but that doesn’t speak well for his writing necessarily. If I haven’t made it obvious enough, I disliked this column, and hope he can be more sly next time.
“Franklin Roosevelt’s 1937 impassioned speech calling on Congress to help the one-third of Americans who were “ill-housed, ill-clad, and ill-nourished” heralded in the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and with it a national minimum wage. Echoes of that speech are still heard today. Senator Edward Kennedy (1989: S14707), in his criticism of the most recent increases in the minimum wage, declared:
Minimum wage is a topic that has been popping up since the 1980s. From whether we should lower it, or even raise it, but now in the 2000s minimum wage has been the center of attention more than ever. There are two sides to this topic of minimum wage; whether it creates more jobs or does not create jobs. Those who argue that raising minimum wage will create more jobs will have a rebuttal which is that it does not only cause the loss of jobs but that it would make things much worse and vice versa for those arguing raising minimum wage will cause loss of jobs. There will be two authors representing opposite views, Nicholas Johnson supporting minimum wage will not cost jobs with his article “ Evidence Shows Raising Minimum Wage Hasn’t Cost Jobs”
basic charge of this criticism can be stated in the words of a recent critic,
The article discusses the minimum wage has not kept up with the current cost of living, and that it is
In an editorial written by Warren Buffett for the Wall Street Journal, according to S. Kumar in his article “America’s Workers Have Bigger Problems than the Minimum Wage” for Fortune Magazine, the problems that American workers face are far more than just attaining a livable wage. The three biggest problems that Americans face include the growing power of corporations, competition against technologies, and the growing income inequality that requires specialized skills where low-wage workers may not have education or capabilities to adapt. However, the minimum wage is still a serious problem, according to Roger Lowenstein. Lowenstein writes that the minimum wage does not provide a livable wage, which is a real problem when families are trying to survive on income that is too low even for an
Raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour has been extensively debated over the last year or so. Minimum wage is the undermost wage allowed by law to be given to an employee for their services. Introduced in 1939, its purpose was to stabilize the economy, which was healing from the Great Depression. Most importantly, it was designed to protect the health and welling-being of employees. Currently, the Federal Government 's minimum is $7.25 per hour ($14,500 per year). The ones in favor of the increase are saying that it used to be a living wage; however, now it is not and it now needs to be line with changes to the cost of living. In addition, an increase in minimum wage can increase the productivity and decrease income inequality and poverty. On the other spectrum, the ones who are against the increase are saying that the increased labor cost will drive up unemployment, affect small businesses negatively, and cause other workers from different
Gitterman, Daniel P. “Remaking A Bargain: The Political Logic Of The Minimum Wage In The United States.” Poverty And Public Policy 5.1 (2013): 3-36. EconLit. Web. 24 Oct. 2013.
According to Principles of Macroeconomics by Gregory Mankiw, “The U.S. Congress first instituted a minimum wage with the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938” (Mankiw 4-119). Minimum wage is used to set a limit of pay employers must pay their employees. Through the years the minimum wage has raised as productivity has raised. The minimum wage has constantly fluctuated and changed multiple times.
The first minimum wage was put in place by Congress in 1938 as part of the Fair Labor Standards Act. It was set at twenty-five cents. Since then minimum wage has continually fluctuated, and currently, it is $7.25, but Congress is now considering the Fair Minimum Wage Act (Whittner) which would, over the course of two years, raise minimum wage to $10.10 (Sherk). Adding almost three dollars to the United State’s minimum wage will most certainly have a large, positive impact on the nation. Congress should raise minimum wage because it would boost the economy, it would create jobs, and it would not be right to let people who work full time to live in poverty.
The people, who are for raising the minimum wage, are people who think that the reason for poverty is because of the minimum wage not being high enough. The first standard minimum wage is formed under the "Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, the nationwide minimum wage was designed to lift millions of American workers out of poverty and to stimulate the economy"(Wittner). Today the people that are in favor of raising minimum wage believe that there should be another "Fair Labor Standards Act" to raise the national minimum wage to ten dollars and seventy-fo...