Comparing A Pocket Full Of Rye And A Dog's Purpose

713 Words2 Pages

Over the course of the first marking period of 8th grade, I have read two books that seem to be completely different. The first one is titled A Dog’s Purpose, written by W. Bruce Cameron. He is not only a creative writer but also an avid dog lover. The second book is called A Pocket Full of Rye, by the well-known mystery writer Agatha Christie. Like I mentioned before, these two books do seem very different when one first sees them placed together. A Dog’s Purpose has a dog as a narrator, while the other is written from a third person’s point of view. A Dog’s Purpose is about a dog that reincarnated several times, while A Pocket Full of Rye is about investigating a murder case. These two books do not seem to have any similarities, yet they actually do. To begin with, they are both fiction books. This is actually a fairly obvious similarity. Both books also have contents about a murder case. A Pocket Full of Rye I do not …show more content…

A Pocket Full Of Rye starts off by introducing the reader to the victim of the murder case and later explains how the detective eventually figures out who the murderer is. This book is completely fictional since the murder case in the story has never happened before, though it may in the future. The murder case mentioned in the book is about a young housemaid assisting a murderer without even knowing that she is involved in a murder case. The story makes both the reader and the character feel emotional, especially towards the end. This becomes evident when the author describes a character called Miss Marple’s actions on the last page of the book, “The tears rose in Miss Marple’s eyes. Succeeding pity, there came anger-- anger against a heartless killer.” This entire story is intense and constantly keeps the reader thinking and suspecting all the characters. It is almost impossible to put the book down since events and clues come one after

Open Document