Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Death penalty for crimes and punishments in medieval times
Society in the Victorian era
Society in the Victorian era
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Comparing A London Fete and Clever Tom Clinch Going to be Hanged
This essay will contrast the two poems ‘A London Fete’ written by
Coventry Patmore and ‘Clever Tom Clinch Going To Be Hanged’ by
Jonathan Swift. Both of these poems are about the hangings in the 17th-18th
century.
A London Fete was written in the 18th century, whereas Clever Tom
Clinch was written in the 17th century. This could have made a slight
variation in what the poet had written because of the time variation.
For instance nowadays we are more civilised because of the new laws
have been brought in.
Although both of the poems were written about hangings, A London Fete
was more persistent on the crowd’s behaviour and response rather than
the condemned man who was going to be hanged. In the poem it states,
‘They brought the man out to be hanged’ this is the only line, which
talks about the condemned man. I think that Coventry Patmore focused
on the crowd more because he might have been confounded by their
behaviour.
On the other hand the poem, Clever Tom Clinch Targeted the condemned
man and his physical appearance. The evidence to support this is, ‘
The hangman for pardon fell down on his knees’ this is the only line,
which does not talk about the condemned man. In my opinion I think
that Jonathan Swift concentrated on the condemned man more because he
might have wanted to tell the a true story that he might have seen
when he was still a young boy.
The title ‘A London Fete’ has not got anything to do with the actual
poem itself, because the word Fete means a carnival. A carnival is
known to be exhilarating and pleasing. Likewise inside the poem the
crowd retort as if, in my opinion, they were fighting each other to
get a mill...
... middle of paper ...
...cts on the crowd’s behaviour. The hanging influenced
all men, women and children. ‘A baby strung its doll to a stick; a
mother praised the pretty trick’. A mother has influenced the baby by
admiring the trick. In my opinion if nowadays such things did happen
the kid would get punished. Two children caught and hung a cat after
the hanging had taken place because they were adapted to that way of
living.
Although both poets had written about hangings they both had different
messages to convey to the reader. Coventry Patmore basically conveyed
that ‘violence would always lead to more violence’. Whereas Jonathan
Swift conveyed that ‘no matter where you are be true to yourself’.
Overall I think that A London Fete is better because it is much more
of a serious poem with serious thoughts. I think it has a kind of
story line, which made me carry on reading.
The Restoration Period (1660-1700) was a period of social, political and philosophical turmoil, which laid the foundation for future centuries. This period was marked by an advance in colonization and trade and by the birth of the Whig and Tory parties. In poetry, works of Alexander Pope and Anne Finch and a number of other poets distinguishes the Restoration. But, there are several objections from these poets; one particular opposition occurs between Pope’s The Rape of the Lock and Anne Finch.
Unsatisfied with conventional romantic poetry that overly idolized women, renowned satirist Jonathan Swift exaggerates the vanity of women in his poem “The Lady’s Dressing Room.” Swift consequently insults all women by portraying the female character of his poem as a vain and superficial figure who attempts to hide her more crude activities (such as defecating). Offended by the misogynistic tone of Swift’s poem, Lady Mary Montegu responds with her own poem “The Reasons that Induced Dr. Swift to Write a Poem Called the Lady’s Dressing Room,” which attacks Swift personally; she alleges that Swift’s attempt to embarrass Celia by exposing her messy room stems from his own embarrassment about failing to perform sexually during an engagement with a prostitute. Montegu’s structure parodies Swift’s, and she strategically inverts his form in places to reveal the sexist undertone of Swift’s poem. She thereby discredits his misconstrued perception of women. Through an analysis of these two poets contrasting portrayals of women, one can draw conclusions about the implications of gender in 18th century culture: women were not complacent in their constricted role in society, but instead were acutely aware of the power they possessed.
The Throne of Blood is a film that attempts to recreate Shakespeare's tragedy "Macbeth." This tale is one of greed, deception, and backstabbing traitors. It is the tale of a man prophesized to be king. Once king, he wants more and tries to get what he wants. However, his `trustworthy' friend stabs the king in the back and eventually dies himself. In the end, all that is left is a bunch of dead guys and a castle without a king; pretty tragic if you ask me.
In Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare uses foreshadowing from multiple perspectives to convey his message on how young love can be emotionally devastating.
Alexander Pope and Mary Leapor write of a common theme in their lodescriptive poems “Windsor-Forest” and “Crumble-Hall,” respectively. However, the two approach at very differently angles: Pope as if in nostalgia, remembering a place of Eden and a picturesque nature that flirts with human nature; and Leapor as if in a dream, describing what can be considered a place of wonder with vast halls and grandeur scenes. While the two poems share similarities, especially regarding the intense imagery, there are fundamental differences that seem to venerate key differences in the poets. Such differences as gender and social class, despite the gap between writing, lead to question the obvious extremes in views. It is also important when reading to consider the nature of Pope’s work, being written in two parts with the second portion following the Treaty of Utrecht, which tailor to a pro-British agenda (The Symbolic 1938). The major differences in Pope’s and Leapor’s works exist in the invocation of a muse, the use of language to generate emotion, and the use of symbolism to impose some bigger picture. There is irony between the two as Pope uses negatively to embellish beauty and Leapor uses beauty and imagination to mask slavery.
One literary technique that is used very frequently in this short story is the irony. The reunion with his wife with a bright white light shining is ironic. It is ironic because the white light is actually the noose breaking his neck while he is being hung. The soldiers that are hanging him is another use of irony. It is ironic because there are Union soldiers hanging a southerner in the Confederate territory. He had also said that while he was running his feet weren’t even touching the ground. In the end it is ironic because he was never really running at all it was all in his head what he was really feeling was himself hanging and swinging back and forth.
Jane Austen’s, “Pride and Prejudice” is set in the Bennett Estate, this book is in the English comedy genre. The Bennett family has five daughters; Lydia, Kitty, Mary, Jane, and Elizabeth. Mrs. Bennett desperately wants to marry them off. The arrival of Mr. Bingley causes the whole town of Longbourn to be excited and pompous. Mr. Bennett visits Mr. Bingley, which causes the Bennett family to be invited to a ball. At the ball, Mr.Bingley takes great interest in Jane. His mentor and friend, Mr Darcy disapproves the relationship and refuses to dance with Elizabeth. After meeting Elizabeth at many parties, he grows more and more attracted to her. Meanwhile, Jane’s relationship with Mr. Bingley grows.
This essay will be looking at Pride and Prejudice written by Jane Austen and its themes of irony. I will be looking at the passage focusing on Elizabeth and Charlotte discussing Jane’s relationship with Mr. Bingley and how after knowing each other for such a short time they are already falling for each other (Austen 22-23). The passage then relates this to how quickly Mr. Darcy has acquired feeling for Elizabeth as well (24).
Both Plautus and Terence are highly renowned playwrights, whose work has been passed on as an example of comedy in Roman culture. Plautus and Terence both pulled from the Greeks as inspiration, and although both authors’ work is humorous, they take different form. Plautus’ work is extreme, light-hearted and comical, while Terence’s work is more witty and realistic. This can be seen in Plautus’ play Double Bind and Terence’s work The Brothers. In both plays the authors have the same theme of moderation and use extremes to convey this message. Also both plays illustrate general confusion to create humor within the play. However, Plautus does not develop characters within his play, sticking with stock characters throughout the play. Instead Terence
“The Rape of the Lock” by Pope Alexander and “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift are two pieces of literature from the 17th century. The two pieces of literary work are in different genres: poem and essay respectively. They are classical examples of the use of satire to pass a message. Both works touch on the issues of class, gender and race. Swifts work clearly highlights the great divide among the poor peasants and the rich landlords. Swift ridicules the poor to portray the callousness of the rich, upper ruling class. On the other hand, Alexander’s poem is comment about society and is based actual events which happened. This paper shall look at both works (The Rape of the Lock and A Modest Proposal) and try to portray how the two works have highlighted issues of class, gender and race. Jonathan calls for the sale of the children of the poor
‘Monty Python’ is a male group of imaginative actors and script writers whose purpose is to entertain a wide audience with British comedy that contains both surreal and dark humour as well as satire for serious issues. Language features, techniques, devices and genre will all be applied to analyse a dialogue from a ‘Monty Python’ script, The Argument Clinic.
““For God’s sake, hurry up Francis,” he said irritably” (Orwell 99). This clearly shows he does not like his job at all and how he wants to get it done fast. The poking of the hanging man with his stick, and saying, “He’s all right” and checking the time represented just a tiresome inconvenience for everyone. The scene in the story doesn’t indicate feeling of sadness, but rather it has a disturbing meaning instead. It depicts the relief that the job is done (Rodden 75). The image of the hanging man seen from the distance reflects a strong symbol of how unethical and cruel cutting off somebody’s life is. Orwell’s scholar, Paul Melia in the “Imperial Orwell” states, “The laughter and the whiskey the servants of Empire enjoy postmortem may ostensibly be their means of dealing with their unease, but it made patently clear that the British and those Asians who serve their regime experience a privileged existence on quite different plane to the majority of the people” (Melia, 19). After the execution, almost everyone got drunk early in the morning. This way they are trying to dull their conscience and get rid of all the
exaggeration, but this may be how it seems to her, that all men want a
Do not be alarmed, my dear sister, on receiving this letter, for I only intend to warn and protect a younger sibling such as yourself from an ominous futurity that has been so promptly displaced upon our beloved family. I write without any intention of paining you, only as an act of utmost caution, a presumed obligation of mine while I have been so respectably placed in the guardianship of yourself since the tragedy our father's passing. You must, therefore, pardon with which I implore your absolute attention; by the power vested as your legal guardian and eldest sibling, I demand it of your justice.
In the short story “A Hanging” by George Orwell, an execution is about to occur in Burma. A man who is has committed an unnamed crime is about to receive the ultimate punishment of death. The story describes in great detail his short walk to the gallows where he will face his death. Everyone in the prison camp knows what is to come and all have a somber feeling in their hearts. The jail superintendent wants the death to proceed quickly so that the day can go on as normal. As a young magistrate watches the painful walk, he notices the prisoner walks around a puddle. At that point he realizes the prisoner is still human. “This man is not dying, he is just as alive as we are alive,” he says. After the execution, the men all share a drink in laughter with the body hanging only a few yards away.