Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stephen crane biography
Stephen crane biography essay
Stephen crane biography essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stephen crane biography
“A man said to the universe: Sir, I exist! However, replied the universe, this fact has not created in me a sense of obligation” (Stephen Crane). Crane’s immortal words perhaps perfectly encapsulate the true message of naturalism, a literary philosophy in which nature is a cold and foreboding presence for which a mere ant and intelligent human being are one and the same. This revelation began in the late nineteenth century after the idea of realism had outgrown itself. Prominent authors such as Jack London and Stephen Crane were publishing stories and novels with the overarching theme of nature’s indifference toward man. Two of their most famous works, London’s “To Build A Fire” and Crane’s “The Open Boat,” were both about men who tried to …show more content…
The protagonist, as the narrator remarks, is a shortsighted man who “was quick and alert in the things of life, but only the things, and not in the significances” (London 651), and is instead wrapped up in him-self. His ego is so large that he even ignores the very important advice of never traveling alone in “below seventy-degree weather” (London 653). This man believes himself to be very strong and capable, but the environment around him debunks that sentiment when his dog falls into the river the two companions are walking along. In trying to save the dog, the man takes off his gloves and shoes, which prove to be a big mistake for him. Because it is so cold, his fingers and toes freeze, and he is unable to get a fire going. His inability to understand nature and even perhaps believe that nature is something to be appreciated causes him to essentially lose his life. This series of events proves that nature does not care how capable or intelligent a human may be. Nature does not care that the man saved his dog from dying. Nature does not care what man has accomplished. For nature, humankind is simply another one of its creations. Because the protagonist takes his survival for granted and believes that the cold weather will not affect him, he gets taught a very brutal …show more content…
Out of the four men who are on the dinghy, it is easily argued that the oiler, Billy, is the strongest and most hard working. In fact, the narrator of the story describes him as “busy” (Crane 605) several times. When the men are swimming to safety, it is the oiler who swims with the hardest strokes. However, of the four men, the oiler is the only one who dies. This sudden change in events only reiterates one point: nature is indifferent. Had nature cared, the oiler would certainly have not been the one to die, based on his accomplishments and skill. It is surmised that nature is uncaring of who she kills. To her, our merits are
As a chechaquo, or newcomer to the land, and this being his first winter, he should have listened to the advice of the old-timer at Sulphur Creek, who told him men should not travel without other men when the temperature is seventy-five below zero. When man is seemingly successful and boldly thinks, “Those old-timers were rather womanish, some of them” (London 553). This shows that the man is trying to challenge nature simply by defying the word of more experienced men. In such harsh climates, men truly adapt to nature out of the necesitity to survive.By defying the word of an experienced traveler, the man is attempting to challenge nature by changing the ways men have adapted to it. Next, the man ignores his only traveling companion, a dog. While the man regards the dog to be inferior in every way, he overlooks a crucial piece of evidence- the dog is naturally suited to the environment. The dog’s survival instinct is shown to be of value when the man misjudges the temperature to be fifty below zero, a cold but normal temperature to be outside, when in reality it is seventy-five below zero, a temperature where travelling should not occur. London expresses the misguided superiority by stating, “This man did not know cold. Possibly all the generations of his ancestry had been ignorant
Stephen Crane’s short story, “The Open Boat” speaks directly to Jack London’s own story, “To Build A Fire” in their applications of naturalism and views on humanity. Both writers are pessimistic in their views of humanity and are acutely aware of the natural world. The representations of their characters show humans who believe that they are strong and can ably survive, but these characters many times overestimate themselves which can lead to an understanding of their own mortality as they face down death.
Stephen Crane’s “The Open Boat” has long been acclaimed as a fascinating exemplar of Naturalism, generating many studies that range from the indifference of Nature to the “psychological growth of the men through the experience” (466). The psychological growth happens to every man on the boat, yet is mostly depicted through the voice of the Correspondent and in the form of his questioning and contemplating their desperate situation. Being a correspondent, who is innately able as well as inclined to interpret and communicate ideas, the Correspondent is singled out to articulate the mind of his three fellowmen and of Stephen Crane himself, should the story be seen partly as a journalistic account of his own adventure. Therefore throughout the story, the Correspondent takes the mediating role between the men and the outside world, combines a spokesperson with an interlocutor, and reflects the men’s growing awareness to the indifference of Nature.
"I am absolutely confident that beyond the motif itself, there is no similarity of treatment whatever" (544). Jack London, writing in December 1908, was responding to an inquiry from the Richard W. Gilder, editor of Century Magazine. Gilder, having just published "To Build a Fire" in his magazine, was worried when he came across another version published 6 years earlier. London's explanation was that the first story was for boys and the new one was for men; the only similarity being the motif itself. Through careful analysis of the two stories, in light of this letter to Gilder, and another letter to Cloudesly Johns, it is apparent that although London claims no similarities (besides the motif), they definitely exist.
In the short story “ The Open Boat,” by Stephen Crane, Crane does an outstanding job creating descriptive images throughout the entire story. With saying this, Crane uses symbolism along with strong imagery to provide the reader with a fun and exciting story about four guys who 's fight was against nature and themselves. Starting early in the book, Crane creates a story line that has four men in a great amount of trouble in the open waters of the ocean. Going into great detail about natures fierce and powerful body of water, Crane makes it obvious that nature has no empathy for the human race. In this story, Crane shows the continuous fight that the four men have to endure in able to beat natures strongest body of water. It 's not just nature the men have to worry about though, its the ability to work together in order to win this fight against nature. Ultimately, Crane is able to use this story, along with its vast imagery and symbolism to compare the struggle between the human race and all of natures uncertainties.
Naturalism was a literary movement that took place from 1880s to around the 1940s. This movement used detailed realism to propose that social conditions, genetics, and the environment had unavoidable force in shaping human character. According to Zhang, “Naturalism was first proposed and formulated by French novelist Emile Zola, and it was introduced to America by American novelist Frank Norris.”(Zhang par.1) The term naturalism defines a type of literature that attempts to apply scientific principles of objectivity and detachment to its study of human beings. Naturalism writers often used the regularly ignored lower to middle classes backgrounds for characters in their stories. Naturalistic authors believe that the laws behind the forces that govern human lives might be studied and understood through the objective study of human beings. Natur...
The external conflict of man against nature and the internal conflict of man against himself play a huge role in the whole story, leading to the fateful outcome of the man. The man fell victim to the struggles the conflicts presented, majorly impacting the story. "To Build a Fire" encompasses the idea of man becoming his own enemy and people remaining insignificant to forces of natures. The conflicts presented in the story embody the aspect of nature as an unstoppable, unpredictable, and powerful force that easily overtakes man. That thought shows how one man has little effect on nature, and in the end, does the most harm by subjecting oneself to nature's fury. The story, "To Build a Fire" by Jack London truly shows how weak an unprepared person compares to the unruly forces of nature.
As the plot unfolds, I feel the story's protagonist falls victim to several factors brought into play at once: his inexperience with the severity of the Klondike winters, his inability to envision the possible consequences of his decision to travel alone in such weather, a series of unfortunate events during his trip, and the misjudgment exercised in his attempts to survive those incidents. Though quick and alert, the man's lack of imagination renders him unable to visualize what might happen to a man traveling without a companion should adverse circumstances arise in such severe weather in an uninhabited landscape. When he indeed finds himself in dire straits as a result of getting wet in the brutal freezing weather, he once again fails to imagine how quickly the cold will threaten his life and consequently misjudges the severity of his situation. His poor judgment causes him to make one mistake after another until he finds himself incapable of extricating himself from his situation. It seems obvious that had he made himself more familiar with the culture of the land and paid attention to the warnings of the old-timer on Sulpher Creek, he might have chosen to delay his trip and live to travel another day. Had he understood the importance of fostering a relationship with the dog, a native Husky with inbred instincts regarding the native climate, the dog would have interacted differently with him, maybe warning him of the danger of the weather through its actions or perhaps providing help, either by sharing its body heat or by going for help. However, instead he held little regard for the dog and the dog reciprocated: "there was no keen intimacy between the dog and the man.
... out that nature, although it does impact the men's lives, does not have any connection to the outcome. With his short story, Crane challenges the idea that men and nature are connected spiritually. He even challenges the idea of religion by leaving the outcome of the men simply to the experience that they have. The boat, an oar, and some directions from their captain save the men from death, not a divine guide. One man simply does not make it to the shore alive. The view of man and nature within this story is somewhat pessimistic, pointing to the philosophy that we are hopeless in the face of circumstance. The point Crane makes in the end is that although people are often victims of circumstance, humans have one another to help survive difficult experiences.
When the narrator introduced the main character of the story, the man, he made it clear that the man was in a perilous situation involving the elements. The man was faced with weather that was 75 degrees below zero and he was not physically or mentally prepared for survival. London wrote that the cold "did not lead him to meditate upon his frailty as a creature of temperature, and upon man's frailty in general, able only to live within certain narrow limits of heat and cold."(p.1745) At first when the man started his journey to the camp, he felt certain that he could make it back to camp before dinner. As the trip progressed, the man made mistake after mistake that sealed his fate. The man's first mistake was to step into a pool of water and soak his legs to the knees. This blunder forced the man to build a fire to dry his wet socks and shoes so his feet would not freeze and become frostbitten. When the man began to build a fire he failed to notice that he was doing so under a large, snow laden spruce tree where he was getting his firewood. When the man had a small fire that was beginning to smolder the disturbance to the tree caused the snow to tumble to the ground and extinguish the fire. "It was his own fault or, rather, his mistake. He should not have built the fire under the spruce tree. He should have built it in the open."(1750).
A leader and a fatherly figure, the Captain serves as the men's compass and keeper of order. His firm navigational commands and calm demeanor make the men a “ready-to-obey ship's company” regardless of their lack of practical experience. Ironically, the Captain is also the most physically useless man on board. Injured from the sinking, the Captain is filled with a quiet despair over his own ability to survive. A hardened seaman, he believes in the idea that a captain should perish with his ship -- to live at sea and to die at sea. The Captain even clings to the dinghy upon being rescued as if he feels a sense of obligation to remain with his boat in the briny deep. Though distraught over the fate of his ship and crewman, the Captain takes solace in providing for the dinghy’s survivors. Occupied with the well-being of others, the Captain does not contemplate his purpose or circumstances in life; he uses his energy to protect his crew and vessel, finding a renewed sense of meaning in this lesser form of leadership. Even when a callous seagull attempts to nip his open wounds, the Captain gently waves the bird away, respecting its life. The Cook on the other hand, attempts to swat it with an
Overcoming Human Nature “The Man in the Water” by Roger Rosenblatt discloses the event of a plane crash on the East coast of the United States. How the plane descended into the icy river water of Washington D.C nor the cause of the sudden crash would mark the crash as memorable or distinct. The event would not begin to be remembered until one passenger did the unthinkable; he defied human nature by suppressing his need to survive. It is no lie to say that humans are programed to “survive,” meaning we would do all we could in order to keep ourselves alive.
Life is a serious of events. Each person comes and goes from one activity to another, a run to the Starbucks on the corner for a morning brew or the boarding of the evening commute back home. In the genre of realism, these every-day monstrosities are explored. This concept, combined with the “scientific principles of objectivity and detachment” (Campbell), creates the style of naturalism in literature. Through his detailed usage of realism, the author Stephen Crane is often portrayed as one of the leading founders of naturalism in American literature. Having been raised in a religious family during the rise of Darwinist ideals, Crane uses the trends of the times and the world around him to create works that are celebrated by critics as some
One characteristic of Naturalism in literature is that the characters in a story are described as being conditioned or controlled by the environment in which they are in; in essence man versus nature. In “To Build A Fire”, the man travels in the Yukon at a bone-chilling 75 degrees below zero. The environment in this story is used to portray a harsh, unforgiving landscape that can ultimately control ones fate if they don’t take the necessary precautions as the man did in this story. He didn’t think the environment could pose such a danger that any situation he encountered in it would get out of his control. Even with the advice of an old-timer to the area who advised him to take a partner at 50 below 0. It illustrates that the environment may seem under ones control, but one should never let their own perception of control interfere with the realization of the reality that no one runs nature other than “mother nature”. This is not to say that the environment was set out to hurt the man, rather, the environment was indifferent to what was going through it and ultimately what happened to the man. In essence, nature is revealed in this story to have no heart, compassion, or emotions regarding its actions. In this quote nature can be seen to control an action which is out of the individuals control: “In a seemingly safe, solid spot, the man falls through the snow and wets h...
The “Open Boat” and “A Mystery of Heroism” are both fantastic displays of Stephen Crane’s mastery with naturalism. The first depicts the struggles of four men trying to survive the open ocean, the latter a commentary on the obscure requirements of heroism. Both stories shared similar characterization by letting the reader decipher the protagonist through their actions and thoughts. The themes of the two stories differed, one emphasizing the indifference of nature and the other musing the ambiguity of what constitutes a hero. The conflicts also shared a likeness, with the power of repetitive nature of waves connecting to the force and persistence of artillery fire. The values of the stories still hold prevalent to modern society. Wars still rage on, many heroes are lost and forgotten, and nature still holds her unrelenting grasp on human complexion.