Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical appreciation of leo tolstoy story
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical appreciation of leo tolstoy story
What would you do if you knew you were dying? Some people go out and do crazy things with their last days on earth. Other people spend time making their lives right and spend time with family or friends. To be honest, I am really not sure what I would do. In this paper, I am going to compare Leo Tolstoy’s title character in “The Death of Ivan Ilyich” to Chi Tien-Hsin’s unnamed character in “Man of La Mancha”. Both men are faced with death. Ivan knows for certain that he is close to death. On the other hand, the guy in “Man of La Mancha” does not have a chronic illness. The way that these two men behave when they are thinking about dying is completely different. The way they act shows their overall character, and it shows what kind of person …show more content…
He stopped sleeping and had to start taking opium and morphine. “The dull depression he experienced” (Puchner 765) effected everyone else. He then began to stink. He eventually could not even go to the bathroom by himself. He had his beloved servant Gerasim carry him to his couch. He then had Gerasim elevate his legs and sit and talk to him. Gerasim was the only person who Ivan could stand being around. Everyone believed “that he was not dying but was simply ill” (Puchner 766) and all he needed was peace and quiet. Ivan wanted to tell his family to stop lying to themselves, but he could never work up the courage. Another reason I believe that Ivan Ilyich was not a great man, is because of the type of relationship he has with his wife. Ivan hates his wife “with his whole soul” (Puchner 769). She does not even spend time with him during his illness. Anybody who can be that cold towards someone they supposedly love, is not a good person in my book. Praskovya sometimes asked Ivan how he was feeling, but she only asked “for the sake of asking” (Puchner 770). All she cared about was herself. She just wanted people to think that she was a devoted, loving wife to her dying …show more content…
He had an arrhythmia. Our guy started feeling badly one morning, and ended up going to the hospital. This is when he started contemplating what would happen if he were to die. He thought through where he wanted to be, what he wanted to be wearing, and what he wanted to have with him. The first thing he wanted to change about his life was his wallet. He threw out a bunch of old junk because he did not want people to know “how shabby” (Puchner 1237) he was. He also made sure that he put his name and information in it because he had no official identification. Then our guy decided to change his underwear. He did not want to be found in dirty, tattered, underwear. He believes that underwear prove a lot about the person. This leads him to go out and buy some brand new Calvin Klein boxers. Then he began to worry about the location in which h would be found. He knew a guy who was found in a sex sauna, and nobody could explain why he was there. He was determined to avoid “vulgar, tasteless” (Puchner 1239) areas. He avoided certain quaint alleys because he was “afraid that my significant other would suspect…an illegitimate child or…and old flame” (Puchner 1239). He tells us that he is a little bit jealous of old people and people who know that they are dying. He says that they have time to get rid of all of their embarrassing things, and get their lives
The Death of Ivan Ilyich by Leo Tolstoy tells the story of Ivan Ilyich, a man who deals with a mysterious illness through introspection. Until his illness, he lived the life he thought he was supposed to live. Like Candide, he was living in blind optimism. He assumed that what he was doing was the right thing because he was told as much. He had a respectable job and a family. Happiness, if it did occur to him, was fulfilling his duties as a husband and father. It was his sudden illness that allowed him to reflect on his choices, concluding that those choices did not make him happy. “Maybe I have lived not as I should have… But how so when I did everything in the proper way” (Tolstoy 1474)? Ilyich had been in a bubble for his entire life, the bubble only popping when he realizes his own mortality. This puts his marriage, his career, and his life choices into perspective. Realizing that he does not get to redo these choices, he distances himself from his old life: his wife, his children, and his career. All that is left is to reflect. This reflection is his personal enlightenment. He had been living in the dark, blind to his true feelings for his entire life. Mortality creates a space in which he can question himself as to why he made the choices he made, and how those choices created the unsatisfactory life he finds himself in
He realizes that he is dying from this illness by himself. Since this is the case, he begins going through the stages not whenever the doctor says “you only have x amount of time to live”, but whenever the doctor avoids giving him a definite answer to his question if the illness is dangerous or not. This is where Ivan starts his stage of denial. Even the narrator foretells this denial by the satirical comment about Ivan’s life: “and it was all very well.” (pg. 22) After he sees the doctor it is written that Ivan says: “maybe in fact it’s all right…” (pg. 25) He begins to be interested with other people’s health, and “tried to make himself think that he was better.” (pg. 25) A sign that we see Ivan’s denial clearly is from his action of “constantly consulting doctors”. (pg. 26) Kubler-Ross said that a patient “went shopping around” for different doctors. Through his denial, he began also to have fits of anger. These would continue to happen until shortly before his actual death. The biggest torment for him was that everyone was living a lie. No one would acknowledge that he was dying and he and they both knew it. Another thing that caused his anger was when someone (usually his wife) would disturb his peace. If they took him out of his pleasantness, it reminded of him of his illness and then would get agitated. The anger continued to grow. He even got angry at
Though illness stripped both Morrie Schwartz and Ivan Ilych of their hope for survival, their dissimilar lifestyles led each to a much different end. Morrie found himself in an overflow of compassion while surrounded by family, friends and colleagues. Ivan, on the other hand, found only the obligatory company of his wife and the painful awareness that no one really cared. Both characters ended their lives the way they lived them, as Ivan acknowledges: "In them he saw himself" (Ivn, 149). While Morrie poured himself into every moment of life and every relationship he pursued, Ivan skirted the dangers of emotion to live "easily, pleasantly, and decorously" (Ivn, 115). In the spirit of such an opposition, the two stories become somewhat like responses to each other. Morrie Schwatrz, proclaimed...
Leo Tolstoy as one of Russia’s great writers, wrote marvelous pieces looking at societal questions and playing with the minds of his readers. The Death of Ivan Ilych is one of Tolstoy’s best written short stories and a popular story for the world on the topic of death and the process of dying. This story is about a man confronting death and in a way bringing life to him during the process of his death. Ivan Ilych fell onto the inevitable trail of death and had realized the true meaning of living along the way. The concept of writing about death is not in any way a new concept nor was it obscure to read in Tolstoy’s era; what makes this short story special is the way that Tolstoy illustrates his character. Ivan Ilych goes through a journey of discovery while he is dying. This story attempts to tackle the questions that cannot be answered; what makes a man happy in life, what makes life worth living?
The short story “The Death of Ivan Ilych” is about a man who realizes he is dying and that no one in his life cares about him. Even more disappointing for Ivan is the realization that besides his success as a high court judge, he has done nothing else to make his life worth saving. The death of Ivan Ilyich, sadly, comes as a release of stress to all. In the end, Ivan is soothed by the release of death, his family and friends are relieved of having responsibility of Ivan taken off their shoulders, and the reader is released from the stressful journey. Tolstoy teaches the audience through the structural elements of the “black sack” metaphor and pathos about the unavoidability of death and the relief of accepting it.
The Death of Ivan Ilyich is a story written by Leo Tolstoy in 1886. Leo Tolstoy was born in 1828 into a Russian society. Tolstoy had a rough childhood growing up. By the age of nine, both of his parents died and he was force to become an orphan. As Tolstoy grew older, he became known for being a womanizer and gambler. He engaged in premarital sex with prostitutes and these women became his downfall. Then he went under an acute conversion. Although Tolstoy converted, he did not adapt the traditional beliefs of a Christian conversion. He rejected the idea of afterlife which plays a role in Death of Ivan Ilyich. This story is about the life of an average man named Ivan Ilyich, who faces the fact that he is eventually going to die. Death is very
They are surprised by his death, but immediately think of how his death will affect their own lives, but more importantly, their careers. “The first thought that occurred to each of the gentlemen in the office, learning of Ivan Ilyich’s death, was what effect it would have on their own transfers and promotions.” (pg 32) As a reader, you have to wonder how Ivan must have had to live in order for people close to him to feel no sadness towards the loss or even pity for his wife. In fact, these gentlemen are exactly like Ivan. The purpose of their lives was to gain as much power as possible, with no regard for the harm that was caused by their selfish endeavor.... ...
Ivan has a strong disconnect with his family and begins feel like he is always suffering, while beginning to question if his life has been a lie. An example of this for prompt number three is when we are giving the quote "Ivan Ilych's life had been most simple and most ordinary and therefore most terrible." Leo Tolstoy implies through the quote that even though he lives an ordinary
Ivan Ilych was a member of the Court of Justice who was "neither as cold and formal as his elder brother nor as wild as the younger, but was a happy mean between them—an intelligent, polished, lively, and agreeable man” (Tolstoy 102). He lived an unexceptionally ordinary life and strived for averageness. As the story progresses, he begins to contemplate his life choices and the reason for his agonizing illness and inevitable death. “Maybe I did not live as I ought to have done, but how could that be, when I did everything properly?” (Tolstoy
Although we as a society have advanced and made people’s lives easier, our mental suffering is as present as ever, due to our incessant need to have everything perfect. We seem to forget that the fascination of living comes from the imperfect and the unexpected. In her essay “On the Fear of Death” Elisabeth Kubler-Ross suggests that the modern age, while increasing life span and ease of life, has at the same time given way to a “rising number of emotional problems,” amongst the living (Ross 407). She also suggests that because of modern society’s progress, there has been an increased anxiety towards death. While Ross is writing for twentieth century society her ideas apply to the nineteenth century as well, when Tolstoy wrote The Death of Ivan Ilych.
Growing up, Ivan lived the life trying to be respectful of others, but always remembering his place in the world. He excelled in school, went on to excel in Law School and then during his career. As he looks back on his life he sees that he was never true to himself. He never accepted his own morals, but instead lived his life by the rules and expectations of others. He lived his life according to what others expected of him. Even though he was awarded great power in his career, he treads carefully to never abuse his power, but instead to follow those who lead by example. He allowed his career to consume him, as he married for the wrong reasons. He married because someone of his statured was expected to get married. He wanted a comfortable life and to be respected. After his wife fell pregnant with their first child she changed and he did not want to spend a lot of time with his family any longer. They became distant, as his career flourished. Ivan was always careful to keep his personal life separate from his professional life. Thi...
In his novella, The Death of Ivan Ilyich, Leo Tolstoy satirizes the isolation and materialism of Russian society and suggests that its desensitized existence overlooks the true meaning of life—compassion. Ivan had attained everything that society deemed important in life: a high social position, a powerful job, and money. Marriage developed out of necessity rather than love: “He only required of it those conveniences—dinner at home, housewife, and bed—which it could give him” (17). Later, he purchased a magnificent house, as society dictated, and attempted to fill it with ostentatious antiquities solely available to the wealthy. However, “In reality it was just what is usually seen in the houses of people of moderate means who want to appear rich, and therefore succeed only in resembling others like themselves” (22). Through intense characterizations by the detached and omniscient narrator, Tolstoy reveals the flaws of this deeply superficial society. Although Ivan has flourished under the standards of society, he fails to establish any sort of connection with another human being on this earth. Tragically, only his fatal illness can allow him to confront his own death and reevaluate his life. He finally understands, in his final breath, that “All you have lived for and still live for is falsehood and deception, hiding life and death from you” (69).
In contrast, some people are open and inviting of death. People who are terminally ill are more aware of the inevitable fate of death, some who are permanently hospitalized due to illness for the rest of their lives may wish for a quicker end as they have no reason to stick aro...
This point of the story is indirectly brought out in the very beginning when Ivan's colleagues, and supposedly his friends, learn of his death. The narrator states in paragraph 5:
According to Kubler-Ross’s theory, the first cycle is denial. Denial in this case is the individual denying that they are dying. When the individual resists the reality that they are going to die. “Then where shall I be when I am no more? Could this be dying? No I don’t want to!” (Tolystoy, “TdofII” p127), Ivan may have felt that he would be leaving too much behind if he were to die: worrying about where he’ll after he dies and refusing to something that cannot be stopped. Concerned mostly about losing his luxuries, he was clearly afraid and couldn’t accept he was dying as shown in this quote. “In the depth of his heart he knew he was dying, but not only was he not accustomed to the thought, he simply did not and could not grasp it.” (Tolystoy, “TdofII” p129).