Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Different perspectives of William Bradford
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Discovering the new world wasn’t done at the same time by both William Bradford and John Smith; so there are bound to be differences and some similarities between their two writings. Which I will illustrate to you in the next paragraph.
Smiths and Bradford texts differ in the way that smith is writing as if it is supposed to be a novel. Saying things that are action scenes that actually keep the readers intrigued to continue reading. Meaning he is putting himself third person. Some evidence in the text that he uses to entertain readers is when he exaggerates the incident of when they have no food and he says “… when god, the patron of all good endeavors, [made the Indians give gifts of food to the settlers]. Which wasn’t even needed but he
…show more content…
did this to give a story like scene.To contradict smith’s text Bradford’s writing style is different in the way that he uses first-person narrative which shows his motives and feeling toward the other members in his short story almost like a biography. John Smith and William Bradford also differ in the way they try to persuade English citizens to come to the new world and the audience they try to persuade to bring.
To start off, Smith tries to the persuade anybody to come to the new world. He does this by exaggerating all the good thing about the new world. For instance when he says “What can be more [fun then being able to plant plants, fruits and herbs at your own leisure]. He totally avoids the point that there are Indians in this place, also, that they don’t even know if their friendly or not. This is a contrast in the way that Bradford tries to persuade the upcoming generation. He does this by giving his own perspective of what he is or has been going through. For instance when he tells about all the deaths that happened on the voyage on the way to the new world or the turkey diner they had with the Indians.
However, both writers do agree on one issue: the New World should be inhabited and settled, while hard-working white men should fill it. But both go in different directions of how the new found land should be used. John Smith dreams of making businesses and factories and conquering the Natives; on the other hand, William Bradford wants New England to be a place of refuge for his
people. To sum all up, Smith’s text and Bradford’s text are different because smith has more of an entertaining story while Bradford takes a real life approach off how the new world really is. On the other hand, they also have similar views on how the new land should be used to help to make the new colony… the united states.
The New England and the Southern colonial settlements were united in several areas that created the opportunity for each group of colonies to grow. However, these groups of colonies took divergent paths when it came to the founders’ motives to settle the New World, the importance of religious and social orientation, economic approaches and political developments. These different approaches were ultimately successful beyond the early founders’ expectations.
Thus, Smith was a very proud and boastful man. Before reaching 25, he battled in many areas, such as the Netherlands and Hungary. He fought at sea off the Atlantic coast, where he was captured as a slave. As a slave, he was rough and beaten. The Indians that captured him brought him to their leader named Powhatan. Powhatan didn’t like him, so he threatened him to death and began to plan his death. Powhatan’s daughter, Pocahontas, fell in love with Smith and gained her fathers trust. He soon became Powhatan’s son. Burned severely in a gunpowder explosion, Smith was sent back to England for recovery. He returns to America in 5 years, only this time to New England.
The Chesapeake and New England regions were settled by people of English descent, but by 1700, they had become two distinctly different societies. They had evolved so differently, mainly because of the way that the settlers followed their religion, their way of conducting politics and demographics in the colonies. Even though the settlers came from the same homeland: England, each group had its own reasons for coming to the New World and different ideas planned for the colonies.
Riches and materialistic things drew many people into the new land, but other people, like the settlers of Plymouth, were not drawn by materialistic riches, but by the riches of their religious faith and the freedom to practice what they wanted. Both colonies had many difficulties throughout their stay. Each settlement took their own approach at how to deal with things and how to overcome their own obstacles. They each saw their own way of finding space and because of that, both colonies were completely different because they each found a way to accomplish their goal and fulfill their
The Exploration Era was a time period when countries and people made journeys overseas to find “the New World.” With the help of the printing press, the discoveries of the Americas were known globally making people curious to explore it themselves. In the map “Distribution of Columbus’ Letter” (Document D), it shows where the letter was published and where it was translated to different. This is due to the printing press. Along with the many documents, the news of Christopher Columbus’ discoveries of “India” or the New World had sparked the curiosity of people all over the world. People became more interested in geography and seeing what’s out there along with the different resources. The New World discovery opened up a new trade route and different trade items. This would create pros and cons like economic growth and slavery. In addition the exploration of the Europeans helped us gain knowledge and get a picture of the Americas. In the “Henricus Martellus’ World Map, 1489” (Document E), it shows the world as they knew it with Europe, Africa, and Asia. The “Martin Waldseemuller's World Map, 1507” was an updated, more correct version of the world we see today. Waldseemuller’s map includes the Americas and was much bigger than Martellus’. The printing press had helped Waldseemuller use this new knowledge to create a map that would depict something
He talks about how Smiths strength and weaknesses had profound effects on Jamestown. What was an interesting fact about Smith, he actually arrived into the colony as a common prisoner and was still able to achieve a leadership role. Smith’s amazing creativity and knowledge in certain areas was what actually saved the colony from starvation and attacks. He gain support with his ability to deal with the native people. Price then goes into detail of describing the people that came here with John Smith. There were no women and the ships were not filled with many soldiers or hardworking men. Instead many of these men that came he with Smith were members of a class from England known as the Gentlemen. They relied on there their titles in life to make there selves wealthy. There main issue was they didn’t know the true value of hard work. This here set the platform for issues to arise. Coming to this new outpost, Smith failed to successfully lead these gentleman, and soon adopted the policy that of one does not work, does not eat. With this strong policy, along with his abilities in addressing, leadership, and organization, he was able to avoid massive failure in
Shannon L. Alder once said, “If you want to discover the true character of a person, you have only to observe what they are passionate about.” There are many ways to see the truth about a person whether it is through what they do or how they act. True colors often show when people least expect it and many would be surprised. In F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel, “The Great Gatsby”, Tom Buchanan and Jay Gatsby may seem like very similar people, but there is more than meets the eye.
During colonial times, European nations quickly colonized the New World years after Columbus’ so called discovery. England in particular sent out a number of groups to the east coast of the New World to two regions. These areas were the New England and the Chesapeake regions. Later in the late 1700s, these two regions would go though many conflicts to come together as one nation. Yet, way before that would occur; these two areas developed into two distinct societies. These differences affected the colonies socially, economically, and politically.
Each of these individuals did their part in making a historical effort on this time period. Their tributes to their communities helped form the nation we are still living in today. William Bradford was a natural born leader and assisted to better his colony in the best of his ability. He was very successful in his trials of teaching and learning as well. Jonathan Edwards was also authentically well in his purposes. From preaching impacting sermons regularly, to being recognized as one of the most prominent philosophers of all time, Edward’s left behind some very big shoes to fill. Bradford, leading his colony as governor in a more lenient matter, and Edward’s, was the stricter of the two. Their differences is what made them both so unique as authors, because their writing skills helped connect with their
They both did as they were told and wrote letters on their findings. The explorers had similar findings, such as, new inhabitant plants, animals, and indigenous people. Also, they reported layouts of the land as they traveled along. However, there were differences with the letters from Columbus and the letter from Cortes. For example, Columbus wrote to Louis De Santangel how the indigenous people were completely naked and were less advanced than the Europeans. Furthermore, the lands Columbus explored were mostly islands and didn’t have much rugged terrain. While, Cortes in a different mountainous area from Columbus saw and wrote to Charles V that the natives were not naked and had a variety of structures with diverse uses, such as, temples and houses for the nobility. Columbus had envisioned the lands for the Spanish colonization, on the other hand, Cortes went for the riches, such as, gold, silver, and other precious metals. Even though their perspectives for the lands were different, however, their Euro-centric perspectives distorted their views on
John Smith explains the hardships of the voyage in the “General History of Virginia” he and others endured. While finally landing on land and discovering the head of the Chickahamania River, The colony endured Disease, severe weather, Native American attacks, and starvation all threatened to destroy the colony. Smith talks about his accomplishments of being a “good leader” and how he helped in many ways. John Smith was captured by the Native Americans and brought back to the camp. Within an hour, the Native Americans prepared to shoot him, but the Native Americans done as Chief Powhatan ordered and brought stones to beat Smiths brains out. John Smith gave an ivory double compass to the Chief of Powhatan. The Native Americans marveled at the parts of the compass. After the Native Americans admired the compass for an hour Chief Powhatan held...
Of Plymouth Plantation by William Bradford and A Description of New England by John Smith are essentially irrelevant to one another in the way that each piece has a very different point of view. The author John Smith was a pilgrim who arrived in the Americas and wrote a description of the new land. William Bradford was also a pilgrim who arrived at Plymouth and wrote more about the realities of his personal journey. The purpose of this essay is to contrast the purposes of the writers, their intended audiences, and how each writer gives out a specific feeling.
The Letter to Santangel by Christopher Columbus proved to be invaluable in many respects because of its description and detailed account of Columbus's discoveries. This letter written after a monumental time in history was rare but provided information that delved into Columbus's intentions, his audience, his beliefs, and his expectations of the New World. Lastly, the letter is also useful as a primary source in history to contextualize Columbus's discovery in 1492 though bias, it is valuable to read from the individual himself.
Although Jonathan Swift and Oliver Goldsmith have two distinct writing styles, their passion for literature, their desire for a better world, and the underlying topic of their work are all strikingly similar. The lives of these two famous authors also resemble each other’s, starting in poverty, living through life’s hardships, and ending in success. Swift and Goldsmith were two of the most famous authors of the 18th century. I believe if Swift and Goldsmith had met, they would have made great friends. For the reason that, along with their passions, their lives were bursting with challenges. Both were born in poverty and underwent numerous challenges, including the death of loved ones and the loss of purpose in life. In addition, Jonathan Swift
When the first American settlement on Roanoke Island was established in 1585 it’s primary force, Sir Walter Raleigh, had no idea that this “New World” would evolve into one of the most powerful voices in the modern world. But before it developed it would have to shaped by it’s founders from the Western world. Two of the largest voices in America’s early development are John Smith, who with a group of English merchants, hoped to get rich in this new land, and William Bradford, a puritan farmer who was one of the most influential men involved with the Mayflower compact. In their two pieces they both convey America as a place to escape but fail to reach many other similar conclusions on what America was like at this time.