Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Background of Korean war
A essay on the koreans war
The Korea War Of 1950 To 1953 Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Korean War was not only a battle between the communist and nationalist forces, but was also a battle between President Harry S. Truman and General Douglas MacArthur. The two individuals were very prominent figures in the Korean War, however both individuals were viewed differently in the eyes of the public. Truman was consistently failing as a result of his independent and pessimistic-like behaviour, while MacArthur was already successful due to his command in World War II. Despite the differences, the two individuals had more in common regarding their personality as they were both exiled from their position in power and they both had mutually assured public destruction and this was a result of the misconceptions of minor events during …show more content…
the Korean War, thus causing a disruption in the flow of events. Therefore, the events of the Korean War heavily contributed to the underlying tension between Harry Truman and General Douglas MacArthur by resulting in the dismissal of Douglas MacArthur’s command in the war. This is a result of the release of the press statements, the withdrawal of troops, and the wrong focus being on China and Formosa. Foremost, Truman and Washington held specific orders and that was to consult with them prior to the release of any public statements regarding the war. Meanwhile, the State and Defence department approved the idea of a peace initiative and concluded that it would be best to appeal directly to the Chinese. Despite the presidential request, MacArthur’s egotistical behaviour and his disbelief that the war would be less than a victory caused him to make an unauthorized statement criticizing the stagnation of the Eighth Army’s advance at the 38th parallel. On March 24, he proceeded to make another statement which would be later reprimanded by Washington and he taunted and threatened the Chinese implying that the war could expand to China and subsequently, three more statements would be obtained by the press on April 5, six days before MacArthur’s dismissal. As a result, this became the opposite of the US’ peace initiative and there was a potential buildup of Chinese and Communist air forces waiting to attack, thus not benefiting the UN ground forces and causing a possible, but unwanted World War. MacArthur “defied policy” and although he envisioned a possibility where China would surrender, his wish was not granted as a result of his continuous defiance behind the President’s back and his lack of ability to be obedient towards the peace initiative, Truman had no choice but to relieve MacArthur from his command. Therefore, the release of the press statements without getting approval from Truman contributed to the underlying tension between Harry Truman and General Douglas MacArthur by resulting in the dismissal of Douglas MacArthur’s command in the war. Moreover, Truman and Douglas consistently fought over Formosa, which is now addressed as Taiwan, because MacArthur believed that the US had shown too much of a concern for European Affairs and that the US had the obligation to preserve Formosa and its leader, Chiang Kai-Shek, against the possible attack by Communist China.
As a result, popular pressures provided the influence of expanding the war into China and to use atomic weapons, therefore MacArthur’s strategy against China became very clear and that was to: invade, blockade and bomb. This caused a disruption simply because taking “Korean action had become a war with Communist China” and the focus was not on Korea anymore and containing the spread of Communism. This event proves that “policy is made through politics” since the dire need to attack China was immensely present, it contradicted the peacekeeping policy regarding the Korean War and could have caused a WWIII. Ultimately, MacArthur had to be relieved of his command because not only did he have the need to attack China in order to prevent communist action and preserve Formosa, but his own purpose which was “to serve for the US” was persistently hindered due to the excess power he carried. This made it difficult for him to attack issues at an appropriate time rather than trying to concentrate on everything simultaneously. Therefore, the wrong focus on China and Formosa went against the nation’s foreign policy, thus resulting in the dismissal of Douglas MacArthur’s command in the
war. Additionally, the first issue that Truman had to face post-WWII were troop levels and he tried to slow the immediate post-war rush in order to downsize the army. However, MacArthur announced that only 200 000 troops were needed since occupation in Japan was going so well and individuals often thought that this was done on purpose. As a result, MacArthur got ahead of his plans and contradicted his own allies in Washington. As the war prolonged, MacArthur said he had more troops than needed and refused to take any troop suggestions from anyone else. Once the withdrawal of troops from the Peninsula took place, Stalin told North Korea to attack and a great deal of the criticism of the war resulted due to the limited war which the US failed to achieve. It was time to relieve MacArthur when he claimed he didn’t need troops and this goes to prove the very fact that people always had to play by his rules and he always had the need to be right. This often showed individuals that things can go wrong with democratic process and there would always be limits to the president. This decision made it impractical to clear North Korea due to MacArthur’s will to make his own decisions without observing future concerns and criticisms of the war, thus resulting as another reason to why and how MacArthur is abusing his position of authority. Therefore, the withdrawal of the troops contributed to the underlying tension between Harry Truman and General Douglas MacArthur by resulting in the dismissal of Douglas MacArthur’s command in the war. In conclusion, the events of the Korean War heavily contributed to the underlying tension between Harry Truman and General Douglas MacArthur by resulting in the dismissal of Douglas MacArthur’s command in the war. This became the result of the release of the press statements which was not approved or coordinated through Truman or Washington, the focus being on the protection of Formosa and the fight against the Chinese Communists instead of keeping the issues in Korea and the withdrawal of the troops at the wrong time resulting in a North Korean invasion. The reasoning behind these issues often lie upon speculations regarding their inherent characteristic and how these individuals had differences regarding how to approach and conclude the war, but these reasonings are likely to fluctuate as it passes on from different historians who each carry different interpretations. Despite that, one thing that was a fact and strikingly present was the lack of communication and effort to keep personal issues aside and have the nation’s interest first. In terms of potential wars in the future, differences have to be put aside when there are more important matters lying at stake.
Presidents Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower shared many similarities yet still many differences when it came to Cold War foreign policies. Truman’s foreign policies revolved around the Truman Doctrine, which stated that the United States would financially support Greece and Turkey . Despite Truman’s and Eisenhower’s differing political parties, the foreign policies of the presidents shared several similarities. The main differences between the two presidents can be attributed to differing circumstances during their years in office. Both Truman and Eisenhower sought to eliminate communism and support civil rights, but Truman emphasized international relations and the American economy while Eisenhower dealt more with domestic issues around civil rights.
There are many opinions surrounding the question: Was the decision by Truman to drop the atomic bomb ultimately the right or wrong decision? Not only can this question be answered in many different ways, it can be interpreted in many different ways as well. Overall, Truman ultimately made the right decision to drop the atomic bomb. This can be supported by the fact that the atomic bomb helped prevent the deaths of American troops, saved the lives of foreign citizens, and in comparison the atomic bomb was not as destructive as the firebombing in Tokyo.
Influenced by the fear of communism by American society and containment beliefs of people like George Kennan, who advocated that the US should use diplomatic, economic, and military action to contain communism, Truman established the Truman Doctrine, which stated that the US would protect democracies throughout the world, pledging the US would fight it around the world. This doctrine was an extension to both the Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary. In dealing with foreign policy, Truman did everything to protect nations of being consumed by communism, such as the Berlin Airlift, in which Truman decided to avoid the Soviet blockade of West Berlin and flew supplies directly over to the people in need. In Asia, Truman decided to use limited warfare, meaning the lack of atomic weapons, and was highly criticized by Douglas MacArthur, commander of the army, who he later dismissed for not following US policy.
The U.S. president is a person deemed to be the most fitting person to lead this country through thick and thin. It’s been such a successful method that it has led to 43 individual men being put in charge of running this country. However, this doesn’t mean that each one has been good or hasn’t had an issue they couldn’t resolve when in office. But no matter what, each one has left a very unique imprint on the history and evolution of this nation. However when two are compared against one another, some rather surprising similarities may be found. Even better, is what happens when two presidents are compared and they are from the same political party but separated by a large numbers of years between them. In doing this, not only do we see the difference between the two but the interesting evolution of political idea in one party.
There are few words in the English language that are difficult to define. Successful is one of those words considering everyone has their own definition of what it truly means to be successful in life. The word successful becomes even harder to define when paired with the word President. Every President had different qualities that made them successful during their terms. These qualities would be necessary in both times of peril and in times of peace. Americans tend to have a hard time trying to find the few genuinely successful presidents among the masses. Two Presidents that were truly successful were Thomas Jefferson and Harry S. Truman. These men had such an impact on politics on both the national and global levels. Jefferson and Truman
The Korean War changed the face of American Cold War diplomacy forever. In the midst of all the political conflict and speculation worldwide, the nation had to choose between two proposed solutions, each one hoping to ensure that communism didn?t sweep across the globe and destroy American ideals of capitalism and democracy. General Douglas MacArthur takes the pro-active stance and says that, assuming it has the capability, the U.S. should attack communism everywhere. President Harry Truman, on the other hand, believed that containing the Soviet communists from Western Europe was the best and most important course of action, and that eliminating communism in Asia was not a priority.
Truman and the general have many similarities. Such as they were both "determined" ("Cold War.") and made tough decisions with their "heads held up high" (The butter battle book). Another comparison can be when Truman had all of a "suddenly become president" (Mcdougal and Hought 603) during the war and how the general, had all of a sudden been "voted and made... a general" (the butter battle book) during the war. Lastly, both Truman and the general were doubted by their people that they could win the war. Soviet leader Joesph Stalin and VanItch both have many similarities. Firstly, both are represented as "a very rude" (the butter battle book) and "distrusting" (Mcdougal and Hought 604) person. Another comparison can be that Stalin and VanItch were determined to vanquish their enemies with much force. Lastly, Stalin and VanItch both have "boys in their back room" (the butter battle book) to invent and to keep up with the latest inventions. One last invention that caused major conflict in the war was the atomic bomb in the cold war and the Big-boy boomeroo in the Butter Battle Book. Both the atomic bomb and the Big-boomeroo can cause lots of damage that can kill "millions of civilians" (Mcdougal and Hought 623) and both are filled with "tons of TNT" (623) or "mysterious Moe-hacka-moo" (the butter Battle Book). Major conflicts should not be expressed through
His coercive and informational power, however, were not as effective. His coercive power and defensive approach made it challenging to connect with his civilian leadership, which caused many disagreements between the two. His informational power was the deciding factor for President Truman to relieve General MacArthur for insubordination. President Truman’s legitimate power and referent power were effective in that his subordinates respected him, and most of the time supported his decisions. He coercive power was effective in the end when he relieved General
Of the 44 Presidents of the United States, Ulysses S. Grant and Dwight D. Eisenhower had the most in common. Both graduated from West Point and became Presidents. They had been commanding generals of undefeated armies before entering politics. They had no political experiences or even held lower public office. They were Republican presidents who served two consecutive complete four-year terms. Their heroism in the wars settled the foundation of their political career.
Both Truman, and the U.S. Joint Chief’s of Staff (a collection of high ranking officers from all of the armed forces) disapproved of MacArthur’s actions, but were reluctant to do anything about it because of his tremendous popularity. In Tokyo, MacArthur met with diplomats from Spain and Portugal, and made it clear he wanted war with China. The diplomats related this to their home governments in telegrams that were intercepted by the NSA (National Security Agency). This was reported to Truman and he knew that MacArthur needed to be fired. The problem was that Truman could not report that the US had been listening in on other countries secret communications. So Truman was forced to wait until there was another reason to let MacArthur go, one that could be published and not embarrass the US.
Offner, Arnold. “‘Another Such Victory’: President Truman, American Foreign Policy, and the Cold War.” Taking Sides: Clashing Views On Controversial Issues in United States History. Ed. Larry Madaras and James M. SoRelle. 14th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. 291-301.
Truman was born on May 8, 1884 in Lamar, Missouri. Truman was a member of the National Guard. In 1917, his unit was called up into regular service during World War I. He served from August 1917 until May 1919. He was made a commander of a Field Artillery unit in France. In 1944, Truman became nominated for vice president against Henry Wallace, a very unpopular candidate for vice president to Franklin D. Roosevelt. On January 20, 1945, Truman was sworn in as Vice President of the United States. Sadly, his vice presidency only lasted for just 82 days before Roosevelt suffered a massive stroke. On April 12, 1945, Truman was brought up to govern the world, and to somehow end World War II.
The Truman Doctrine and the Development of American Foreign Policy during the Cold War On March 12, 1947, President Harry S. Truman defined United States foreign policy in the context of its new role as a world superpower. Many historians consider his speech to Congress as the words that officially started the Cold War. The Truman Doctrine was a major break from U.S. historical trends of isolationist foreign policy. His speech led to the Cold War policy of containment.
To see that the security of our country and the free world is not needlessly jeopardized and to prevent a third world war.” (history.com) However, MacArthur believed without further aggression against the Chinese, the war was “only endless destruction and the pointless loss of American lives.” (McGovern, 164) He also believed that the press was using him as a scapegoat for the American losses during the war. Many believed this led him to become more aggressive toward the Chinese. MacArthur had asked the administration for permission to bomb communist China but was denied. He then leaked the news that he planned to use nationalist Chinese forces from Taiwan against China to a Congressman and without consulting Washington, he decided to send an ultimatum to China. Although MacArthur knew this would anger Truman, “In
Events that took before the war were what had initially sparked the rancor between both nations of Korea. Despite the fact that World War 2 just ended, tension between North and South Korea remained heated. Causes of the Korean War can mainly be broken down into two different categories; ideological and political reasoning. The Soviet Union, China and North Korea, the communist side, ideologically wanted to secure the Korean peninsula and incorporate it in a communist bloc. This “domino effect” feared individuals such as Harriet Truman due to the fact that the potential danger of other countries such as Japan and Korea becoming a communist bloc was definitely not something Truman had hoped for. Politically, the Soviet Union considered the Korean peninsula as a springboard to attack Russia and asserted that the Korean government should be “loyal” to the Soviet Union, this was where the United States stepped in, realizing that they were in a competition for world...