Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
AN essay about democracy in nigeria
Democratic rule in Nigeria
Independence of india- causes and consequences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: AN essay about democracy in nigeria
The Nationalism and decolonization movements happened between 1920 and 1960 in Africa and Asia. Ghana which was colonized by British in 1874, and gained their independence in 1960, Kenya was colonized by the British in 1895 gained independence in 1964, Nigeria was colonized by the British, and gained their independence in 1960, finally South Africa which was colonized 1854 gained their independence 1960, but later got controlled by white Afrikaners until 1994. Countries in Asia that were India colonized by the British until 1947, and Vietnam was colonized by France in 1887 and controlled by the Japanese during World War II, and gained their independence in 1954. The rights they did not get to have are not rule their own government, racism …show more content…
Britain controlled Ghana, the rights the natives didn’t have were not being able to vote and control their own selves. An example of the non-violent can be found in document #3. The document is written by Kwame Nkrumah, who was leader of the colonial gold coast, In Ghana 1949. The document was for members of the convention people's party to declare independence. Kwame Nkrumah wanted to control themselves because they are strong enough to govern themselves. The positive action campaign was made to fight imperialism through non violence. This was successful because no one was hurt, but still got to do what they wanted to accomplish, which was being able to gain their own government and independence. Nigeria was controlled by the British limited. The British limited their voting and government. An example of the non-violent being successful can be found in document #5. The document was by and Unknown photographer, in Nigeria October 1. 1960. The document was for people in Nigeria to inform them about their independence. The author wanted to show the government led by Nigerians. He shows an image of Nigerians speakers in a ceremony of independence. Some nonviolent actions that they took were making a protest for their government to become and building their freedom. This document was successful because they made their people be a part of the …show more content…
Militant action also forced white people to give them freedom. To conclude, Non-Violent actions examples all explain how countries wanted to gain their own independence and government by having things like protests and walkouts that didn’t involve violence. Militant action shows examples that explain things like fighting for their right towards freedom and independence by including violence. It's important to discuss the success rate of different actions taken during nationalism and decolonization because many people did different things to see right be done along with changes with their lives. During this time period a lot of Non-violent protest and militant protest are being taken to show that rights need to be made and changes need to happen. An event that is important today is the fact of Donald Trump as our president, some of the U.S citizens now face it with nonviolent actions and others with
When you are fight to get peace and fairness back to your government, does it involve nonviolent or violent acts to get what you want? When Gandhi came back to India after getting his law degree, Gandhi started a movement to bring peace and fairness back to their government. What made Gandhi’s nonviolent movement work? The reason Gandhi’s nonviolent movement worked was because he didn’t believe in segregation, didn’t follow the British’s rules for Indians, went to jail for his movement, and he was determined.
As the international shift towards nationalism and self-determination gained momentum in the years after World War II as a result to imperialism’s dangerous influence on the world during the war, decolonization becomes the inevitable truth for nations on both sides of the colonial relationship between an occupying country and a subjugated
It has been debated though out history whether or not nonviolence “works”. Many societies, and this without question includes the United States, have mostly relied on violent tactics. Many people believe that violence is the only way to stop wars, even though it creates war, and people tend to believe that violence is the one solution to many global and political problems. However, recent literature and research is starting to prove otherwise. Erica Chenoweth, a political scientist, recently published a book, Why Civil Resistance Works in 2011. The research highlights data that shows throughout history, nonviolent tactics are more effective than violent ones in various ways.
Gandhi once said “An eye for an eye and the whole world is blind.” This is true in most circumstances but there are exceptions. By comparing acts of nonviolent civil disobedience with acts of violent civil disobedience it is apparent that force or violence is only necessary to combat violence but never if it effects the lives of the innocent. A recurrent theme in each of these examples is that there is a genuine desire to achieve equality and liberty. However, one cannot take away the liberties of others in order to gain their own. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that political change would come faster through nonviolent methods and one can not argue his results as many of the Jim Crow laws were repealed. Similarly, through nonviolent resistance Gandhi was able to eventually free India from the rule of Britain. It is true that sometimes the only way to fight violence is through violence, but as is apparent, much can be said of peaceful demonstrations in order to enact change. Thus, it is the responsibility of we as individuals to understand that nonviolence is often a more viable means to an end than violence.
World War I, also known as “The Great War”, was a global war that revolved mainly around Europe. It took place from 1914 to 1918. This was a very brutal war that caused many casualties. The soldiers who survived experienced severe trauma and mental discomfort. This trauma was a direct result of the violence and agony they experienced during the war. Motivation for this war was the idea of nationalism and the pride in one’s country. This war was the cause of disillusionment among many of the soldiers that were involved in it.
types of nonviolent actions from not just the leaders, but the ones who follow them, show a true
Nationalism has a long history although most scholarly research on Nationalism only began in the mid-twentieth century. Some scholars point to the French Revolution of 1789 as the birth of Nationalism. The French Revolution is seen...
A. Adu Boahen's African Perspectives on Colonialism neatly classifies African responses to European colonialism during both phases of invasion and occupation during the 19th century with precise labels according to their nature or time period. However, the reactions can also be loosely grouped into two diametric characterizations: peaceful and violent. Although creating this dichotomy seems a gross generalization and oversimplification of the colonial African experience, it more importantly allows for a different perspective- one that exposes the overwhelming success of the typically peaceful or pacifist reaction in contrast to the little gain and large losses of the violent response.
Nationalism at its core is the support of a country. The goal of a country is to have some sort of resonance within the individuals that reside there that call themselves citizens. If the citizens don’t feel any connection with their country, they may move to find one that they feel closer too. Once found, they may support the country over others, defend it within conversations of politics or just find groups that have the same ideals they do about the country. This papers purpose is to illustrate the pros of nationalism as well as its cons.
Our government has gone through many changes in the years since the first president and with that modernization, the presidential election of 1912 has made a significant effect on how our county is run today. Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson debated a political situation that still effects government and industry in our nation to this day.
Violence of Decolonization Frantz Fanon argues the decolonization must always be a violent phenomenon because resisting a colonizing power using only politics will not work. Europeans justified colonization by treating it as gods work. They believed that God wanted them to occupy all lands and spread the word of God to savages of darker skin color. Fanon joined the Algerian Nationalist Movement when the Algerians were colonized by the French. Many examples of violence written in The Wretched of the Earth were taken from the struggle for independence in Algeria.
Nationalism has played a crucial role in world history over the past centuries. It continues to do so today. For many, nationalism is indelibly associated with some of the worst aspects of modern history, such as the destructive confidence of the Napoleon’s army and the murderous pride of Nazi Germany. Large numbers of people, descent in their hearts, have carried out unbelievable atrocities for no better reason than their nation required them to. Authoritarian and totalitarian regime have crushed dissent, eliminated opposition, and trampled on civil liberties in the name of the nation.
"The wind of change is blowing through this [African] continent, and whether we like it or not, this growth of national consciousness is a political fact. We must all accept it as a fact, and our national policies must take account of it" (Macmillan). This speech, made by the prime minister of England in 1960, highlights the vast changes occurring in Africa at the time. Changes came quickly and quickly. Over the next several years, forty-seven African countries attained independence from colonial rule.
The process of decolonization in Africa during the 1950’s through the 1970’s was a very smart yet risky idea. For some places independence was easily gained yet in other areas it was a battle. During the time periods where colonization existed, Africa was peaceful and kept things in order. People had control over their specific locations and there were no questions to be asked. Once it was decided to remove these rights, things got out of hand rather quickly. Violence was a main occurrence during the decolonization timeframe because rules, rights, leaderships, etc. got altered and drastically changed. Sometimes nonviolence was used but it usually wasn’t as effective. A major example of using nonviolence actions to gain independence is when Gandhi protested in India. African leaders have tried very hard to lessen the influence of Western powers and the broader international community but they’ve never been completely successful because they continuously needed support in state building, economic development, and public health initiatives.
Nationalism is self identification with one’s country. Nationalism is similar to religion in that it gives a person their self worth and sense of community. One source describe nationalism as as a bond and “awareness shared by a group” who feel “attached to not only the land, but also the culture, language, and history the people share (Brown). Nationalism is accompanied by loyalty and devotion of the people to a nation. Nationalist find great gratification in their history and traditions. With this sometimes comes the feeling that their nation is special and set apart from other nations, creating an atmosphere of superiority. Furthermore, through out history, the idea of nationalism has been the driving force behind those wanting to overthrow governments that are thought to be oppressive