The Contrasting Point of Views
The setting and point of view of a story go hand in hand. The setting gives you the description of the characters’ environment while the point of view may tell you the character’s feelings to their environment. However, not all point of views will tell you how a character inwardly responds to their environment. In Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery”, the objective point of view is used which limits the reader’s knowledge of a character to whatever they do or say, yet in Graham Greene’s “The Destructors”, the omniscient point of view is used to allow the reader an insight into the minds of three characters. Although “The Lottery” and “The Destructors” are extremely different in setting, moods or images gathered from
…show more content…
the title, and point of view, the point of views chosen, by the authors, adds the element of suspense to the reader. Published in 1948, “The Lottery” was placed in a rural village community where some traditions still thrive.
They had forgotten and discarded parts to the main ritual in the story (Jackson 6), the original box and the ceremony, but they still remembered the stones to use against the unlucky winner (Jackson 74). The reader is pulled away from being one to throw the stones or draw a slip out of the box; however, the reader is not just given a passing description of past events. Instead, the words imply that the objective point of view to allow the reader to watch the whole scene unfold. It’s as if they are watching a film or play in this point of view. Allowing suspense to grow and flourish throughout the whole piece, the outcome of the lottery drawing is kept unknown to the reader until the very end in order to keep the reader interested in the story. Even in paragraph 72, a first-time reader wonders what is going to happen to a member of the Hutchinson family and why Tessie is so nervous and unwillingly to open her slip (Jackson 72). Although the title, “The Lottery,” paints a picture of a happy event in the reader’s mind, yet tragedy is inevitable as a village is unwillingly to give up a tradition, as Old Man Warner points out in paragraph 32 (Jackson …show more content…
32). “The Destructors,” a story whose title contains no ironic meaning, was set in almost the exact opposite type of setting as “The Lottery.” Placed in the rebuilding city of London, following the second World War, the Wormsley Common Gang played in a “car-park” that had previously been bombed in the war. The word choice, by Graham Greene, gives an image of a street still containing shells of houses with one leaning house remaining intact, No. 3 (Greene 1). “The Destructors” was written in the omniscient point of view.
The narrator freely peers inside the hearts of Mike, Blackie, and Old Misery; nevertheless, the narrator never enters into T.’s, or Trevor’s, mind. Mike, Blackie, and Old Misery show different parts of the human life after seeing the effects of war. Mike portrays a child with his surprise at everything and simple enjoyment (Greene 1). Blackie resembles the older son in the family who has to learn how to provide for his family and take care of others suddenly. He understood that “he had responsibilities” as the leader of their small gang (Greene 1). Blackie also knew when it was time to be quiet and silently step away from the leadership position, yet he still was childish enough to wish the part doom of his friends at T.’s leadership (Greene 1). Old Misery was the generation which had seen the signs leading to war, survived the war, and was dealing with the effects the war had left in its wake. He held a certain wishful thinking. He held strongly to his belief that his house wasn’t going to be destroyed as it had somehow managed to survive the war (Greene 1,
4). Although set in different time periods and in different locations, “The Lottery” and “The Destructors” are two stories full of suspense and end with destruction. “The Lottery,” written by Shirley Jackson, keeps the readers on their toes as the end result is not revealed until the very ending. Furthermore, a human life is lost every year because of a tradition that began to provide a fruitful corn harvest (Jackson 32). “The Destructors,” written by Graham Greene, never reveals the major motive behind the destruction of Old Misery’s house. The motive is left to be pondered and interpreted by the reader; however, the story contains rising action, falling action, and a climax as you witness the struggle between the gang and the final destruction of a partially-destroyed home. Although these two stories seem unrelated and drastically different at first glance, they share the same end result of destruction and a mystery to be solved. Works Cited Greene, Graham. “The Destructors.” Perrine’s Literature: Liberty University Online English 102, by Greg Johnson and Thomas R Arp, Custom ed., Cengage Learning, 2018. Jackson, Shirley. “The Lottery.” Perrine’s Literature: Liberty University Online English 102, by Greg Johnson and Thomas R Arp, Custom ed., Cengage Learning, 2018.
Toward the finale of the short story, Shirley Jackson, the author of “The Lottery” declares, “Although the villagers had forgotten the ritual and lost the black box, they still remembered to use stones” (873). Many of the residents display no knowledge of the lottery and only participate because of tradition. In fact, only Old Man Warner recollects the authentic purpose of the lottery. He furnishes some insight behind the tradition of the lottery by declaring, “Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon” (Jackson 871). Old Man Warner reveals the original reason for holding the lottery, but Jackson clearly demonstrates that the original purpose no longer exists. The villagers comprehend the procedure of stoning the victim but nothing else. Nick Crawford articulates in an easy about “The Lottery,” “The most disturbing thing about Tessie Hutchinson’s unexpected demise is its...
“The Lottery” is a short story about an event that takes place every year in a small village of New England. When the author speaks of “the lottery” he is referencing the lottery of death; this is when the stoning of a village member must give up his or her life. The villagers gather at a designated area and perform a customary ritual which has been practiced for many years. The Lottery is a short story about a tradition that the villagers are fully loyal to and represents a behavior or idea that has been passed down from generation to generation, accepting and following a rule no matter how cruel or illogical it is. Friends and family become insignificant the moment it is time to stone the unlucky victim.
When writing literature, authors will adapt points of view to mold the perceptions of their readers. Three points of view that authors use to draw readers into their works of fiction are the limited perspective, the first-person perspective, and the objective perspective. Three stories will be examined and critiqued for their use of these narrative techniques. Of the three perspectives that will be examined, the first-person perspective is the most useful for sharing the authors’ vision.
Authors’ use of setting and point of view greatly affect a narrative because they form the readers’ image of the story. First person narration can cause questioning of the narrators reliability, but this bias view can help create more intimacy between the protagonist and the reader. A third person point of view is more objective and allows the author to create the voice of the narrative; the author shapes the story. Through whichever point of view, the author develops a setting. Setting provides tone for the story. A well-established setting can enhance the story’s overall meaning. The combination of setting and point of view in John Updike’s “A&P” helps develop the story’s emphasis on conformity versus nonconformity. Likewise, setting and
Many times in stories, authors will use the setting to set the stage for the story. The setting is like the foundation of the story, and without one the story seems merely lost. Quite often the setting will build up the story and affect the characters, and the characters behaviors. Against the backdrop of a Holocaust concentration camp, Ozick produces two static characters whose lack of development throughout the story emphasizes the theme of overwhelming hopelessness.
Compare and Contrast! Well, you use it on a daily right? The stories “The Lottery” and “The Landlady” are two stories that you can compare and contrast. Some examples of comparisons are that both of the stories use violence, and that they both end with a plot twist no one was expecting. One example of a contrast in both of these stories is that they use their imagery differently. How are these stories alike and how are they different?
The setting is an important part of any story. The setting can help paint a clear picture in order to establish what the characters are feeling, as well as setting the tone of the story. In the following stories, “The Destructors” and “The Most Dangerous Game,” Graham Greene and Richard Connell demonstrate the tone of the story by using Old Misery’s house and General Zaroff’s Chateau as the main focal point. While the two stories present differences in the tone of the setting, they both make a connection to the beauty that these two places possess. Greene uses Old Misery’s house to formulate the story that prepares the reader of how a post-war building and surroundings can have an effect on people’s behavior and feelings, while Connell uses General Zaroff’s Chateau in a way to deceive the reader from what is really happening in the jungle of Ship Trap Island.
The plot as a whole in “The Lottery” is filled with ironic twists. The whole idea of a lottery is to win something, and the reader is led to believe that the winner will receive some prize, when in actuality they will be stoned to death by the rest of the villagers. The villagers act very nonchalant upon arriving at the lottery; which makes it seem as if it is just another uneventful day in a small town. Considering the seriousness of the consequences of the lottery, the villagers do not make a big deal about it. Under the same note it is ironic that many of the original traditions of the lottery, such as the recital and the salute, had long been forgotten. All that the villagers seemed to remember was the ruthless killing of a random person. It also seems strange that they let the equipment for the lottery, the black box, get into such a poor condition.
The lottery consists of a black box full of blanks pieces of paper and one marked piece of paper. The person who draws the marked piece of paper is the one who endures the horrible fate of being stoned. This black box is very significant because it an s symbol of tradition. Just like tradition, it has been used for many years. Because it symbol in this story is the black box, which is used in the lottery process. . The box is a symbol of tradition and just like tradition; it has been used for many years. “ There was a story that the present box had been made with some pieces of the box that had preceded it, the one that had been constructed when the first people settled down to make a village.” It is old and needs to be replaced with a new one but none ...
Written by Shirley Jackson, “The Lottery” is a short story about a town that hosts an annual lottery that decides which person is stoned by the rest of the town. Jackson slowly and subtly builds the suspense throughout the story, only resolving the mystery surrounding the lottery at the very last moment, as the townspeople surround Tessie with their stones. The symbolism utilized helps demonstrate the overall significance of the story, such as the lottery itself. The lottery shows the way people desperately cling to old traditions, regardless of how damaging they may be. In addition, it can show how callous many will act while staring at a gruesome situation, until they become the victims.
Tessie Hutchinson was angry that her husband had gotten the lottery, so the family drew again. In the final draw, the crowd saw that Tessie had gotten the paper with the black dot. The instant the crowd knew who got the lottery, they began grabbing the stones the boys had piled up earlier. Formerly, Mr. Summers joined the crowd and said “let’s finish quickly” to be in time for noon dinner(Jackson, 7). At this instant, Mrs. Delacroix had “selected a stone so large she had to pick it up with both hands” for the ritual(Jackson, 7). This sentence shows how terrible the lottery is and how extreme it can get. Without delay, Tessie is standing in the middle of the crowd when “a stone hit her on the side of the head” and that was the signal to begin the ritual(Jackson, 7). The lottery is just a cruel thing to the victim and their family who have to watch and be a part
Change seems to be closer than expected. Many of the other villages changed their traditions and got rid of the lottery. This sparks some controversy in the society. Some villagers strongly believed that it was time for the lottery to end. Others did not want to part with their cultural traditions, some even believing that the lottery brought good harvest. Unfortunately for Tessie Hutchinson, the traditions do not change in time to spare her life. The author’s description of the symbols in the short story help to reveal the layers of the society in which the lottery exists. Throughout the short story, The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson, the author’s depiction of the black box, Davy Hutchinson, the main character’s son, and the lottery itself help to convey the idea that fear of change can impede evolution in a
In the stories of “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and “The Hunger Games” by Suzanne Collins, both authors deliver the dangers of blindly following tradition that can lead to death, fear and no advancement in society. In “The Lottery” their tradition is to kill a person that is randomly chosen by using a lottery. To compare, in “The Hunger Games” children are also picked out of a lottery from each district and if they are chosen, they need to fight against each other to death. Both stories share a tradition of cruel and murderous behavior but they have a slight difference in tradition.
The title of the story plays a role in how Shirley Jackson used some literary elements to help mask the evils and develop the story. The title “The Lottery” serves as an allegory. When people think of the lottery majority of people associate it with something good like the New York State Lottery where you can win some money. In the story it is used as a way to pick someone to be killed. In the story everyone gathers in the town square and the town’s people draw family names until a black dot is one the slip of paper. Which
The ability of the story to create suspense lies in the fact that the narrator never reveals what the characters are thinking. Therefore, the reader begins to wonder why the lottery box is black, and why the villagers seem to be afraid of it even when they seem excited about the occasion. The mention of chants and other forgotten rituals that had accompanied past lotteries further mystifies the event, but then Mrs. Hutchinson arrives late at the town hall with her lighthearted jokes, the scene again appears to be an ordinary lottery drawing. As the drawing begins, the villagers are suddenly "quiet, wetting their lips, not looking around" (NA, 784). The reader is left to interpret the somber atmosphere; humorless grins of the townspeople reveal little about the source of their nervousness, even though something seems amiss. The suspense quickly builds and the scene becomes ominous as Mrs. Hutchinson cheerful countenance suddenly gives way to anxiety when her husband draws the winning slip. The narrator's perspective reveals only enough to allow the tension to build until the reader finally comes to the shocking realization that the lottery is actually a ritualistic murder.