Compare And Contrast The Daughters Of The Late Colonel And Atonement

1532 Words4 Pages

The Passage of Time The use of the passage of time in both “The Daughters of the Late Colonel” by Katherine Mansfield and Atonement by Ian McEwan, is not typical of the everyday story. The length of these two pieces contributes to their difference in the usage of manipulating time. “The Daughters of the Late Colonel” being a short story, has less to work with, and the plot line of the story is quite skewed. With a much smaller breadth, it has more of the beginning, middle, end feeling, of a typical story. In contrast, Atonement has much more to work with, being a novel, however this story 's plot line is more subtly shifted. Atonement contains three different time periods, and only in the end do we learn that they are all a recollection from …show more content…

The narrative ordering of the story has the beginning set in the middle chronologically, however in reading this for the first time, there is no inclination that it is indeed, set in the middle. This is an occurring theme throughout the short story as the narrative ordering and chronological ordering is hard to interpret between without close reading. The typical narrative follows a distinctive plot line, with the occasional flashback, this style of narrative does not require the attention to the text that “Daughters of the Late Colonel” does. The narrative beginning of the story triggers thoughts of the future, providing no information of the past, and in reading this gives an impression of starting at the chronological beginning: “This week after was one of the busiest weeks of their lives.” (Mansfield 230). Narrative wise, this works out, however chronologically the events would be much different, and would begin with the daughters still having their father alive. The chronological ordering instead begins with the flashback to tea with “dear Cyril” (Mansfield 240). The only part of the narrative order that does happen chronologically is the last few events concluding the story. This is important because for the reader to fully understand what is happening in the story, they have to slow down and process what is really …show more content…

Without fully understanding how the chronological order contrasts with the narrative, one misses how the events truly unfold. As there is no explanation for the reader on how to interpret the narrative events, as there is in Atonement, it can be easy to accept the narrative order as how events unfold, when that is not the actual case. In Atonement, though there is time lapses between character shifts, and a collection of flashbacks, the novel is not as confusing as “The Daughters of the Late Colonel”. The finale reveals the truth behind these flashbacks, and how it is all connected. This leaves it to the story, and not the reader to decipher, making it less of a guessing game. Both Atonement and “The Daughters of the Late Colonel” use the passage of time, in their own way, to build their stories around. “The Daughters of the Late Colonel” seems slightly more reliant on the passage of time, making the readers interpret events of the story, since the whole short story’s narrative is a jumbled mess of the chronological ordering. Atonement on the other hand, seems straightforward, in that the chapters are in certain character 's points of view. The flashbacks seem as memories, however there is some mysteries revolving around the snippets into the future. Finally we come to realize how all these events were through the mind

Open Document