Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
George Washington's style of leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: George Washington's style of leadership
Kollan Luczejko-Reid
Period 4
1/15/16
Rev War Test Part B:
The Continental Army and The Minuten men
Back in 1775 when the colonist started the revolutionary war, two
great groups were created. The Continental Army (The army who fought for the whole country) and the Minute Men (Who fought for their own community). Now these two armies have very distinct differences and different views.
The Minute Men shall be the first for they were thought to show up on a minute’s notice (Hence their name, “Minute Men”). They were generally known as militia because they were local citizens fighting the British when they attack small communities. These were the type of people fighting at the battles of Lexington and Concord in 1775. They donned no uniforms and had no training in fighting compared to the British army and the Continental army. When the Minute Men went into combat, they were each expected to have a gun, some ammo, and their equipment. The towns would usually help each other out but that was as far as they went. Instead of the “Traditional Style” like the British used, these men used “Indian Tactics”.
…show more content…
This meant that they used the trees as cover and other things. These men had no central leadership, meaning that they lacked an officer to keep them in-check. Discipline was also missing. The Minute Men often didn’t have good or right equipment for their battles. Their main battle grounds were usually in their own local area. The Continental army was the staying power.
They followed and went wherever the battle went. These men had been enlisted or signed up and that meant they had to serve for a certain amount of time and they were to get payed for fighting. This army was generally made up of 2nd born sons who had no inheritance, men with no property, no skills or education, Immigrants, and very few women disguised as men. They fought and stayed together throughout it all. They had a structured leadership (Ex: General George Washington) and Congress supplied everything, including training. Congress often didn’t always supply tents and other supplies. At certain points, they starved and became sick and were sometimes unprepared. George Washington often tried to get the Continental army to fight the “Traditional Style” but it did not work out well and they switched to the typhoid
spreads. In the end, both of these armies had disadvantages and some advantages. Overall, both armies played an important role and both were needed to win the Revolutionary war.
The life of a common soldier fighting on behalf of colonial independence during the American Revolution was a difficult one. Recruiters for the Continental Army targeted young and less wealthy men, including apprentices or laborers. Some (like Martin) enlisted voluntarily, while others were drafted. Among the discomforts Continental soldiers suffered were shortages of food or other supplies, long periods away from home, sinking morale and the constant threat of death.
The American Revolution started in the year 1765, when the Colonists rejected the Parliament of Great Britain to tax them without representation and ended in 1783 with the peace treaty with Britain; Treaty of Paris. But a lot of major events occurred in the colonies before the American Revolution could be over and these events would result in series of social, political, and intellectual transformation in American history. In his book, The Minutemen and Their World, Robert Gross’s describes the lives of people in Concord, Massachusetts before, during and, after the American Revolution, where much of these events took place and changed the way of life people lived in Concord. He goes through a very brief detailed aspects of colonial life in
On the brink of revolution, the colonies were divided amongst themselves. Two factions with different ideologies “The Patriots” & and the “The Loyalist”, to know these factions we must first know another. Because both parties played a pivotal role in the “American Revolution”.
Gordon S. Wood, in The Radicalism of the American Revolution, discusses what it means to be truly revolutionary. In this work, Wood shares his thoughts on the Revolutionary War and whether or not it was a movement radical enough to be considered an honest revolution. Wood discusses the reasoning behind the views of those in favor of the war being considered radical, as well as the views of those who believe the American Revolution to be unfortunately misnamed. He claims that “the Revolution was the most radical and most far- reaching event in American history.” Wood’s work is a valuable source for those studying the revolution because it redefines what it means to be radical, but the piece is also limited by the lack of primary information
In the 1770’s the British army was well known for its monetary wealth and professional well trained militia. American colonists were slowly getting more and more fed up with the inequality and taxation under British rule so they took a stand. Americans known as Rebels or Patriots fought in the Revolutionary War to gain independence from Britain. Some colonists also known as loyalists, thought that the Patriots had no chance against the professional militia so they stayed loyal to the crown. Although improbable at the start of the American Revolution, the colonists were able to defeat the British army and formally gain independence because they had great leadership from George Washington, similar goals that created high morale, and aided from
From 1787-1790 the development of the American Constitution was a battle between two opposing political philosophies. America’s best political minds gathered in Philadelphia and other cities in the Northeast in order to find common ground in a governmental structure. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists had both some political thoughts that agreed as well as some political thoughts that disagreed. However, both parties would compromise and ultimately come together.
Proof of this new found unity comes in Richard Henry Lee's letter to Arthur Lee in 1774, where he states "all North America is now most firmly united and as firmly resolved to defend their liberties " As Americans they came together and fought for what they believed in and continued to do what was necessary to get their freedom and independence. Americans developed a sense of identity and unity through many factors such as: the variety and mixture of cultures in America, geography, and the political and economic hardships they endured. This is why by the eve of the Revolution, between 1750 and 1776, they had a strong sense of both identity and unity as Americans.
They were the people who actively participated and sacrificed their lives. Therefore the side they chose to fight on was heavily influenced by their “local interests, grudges, and unfulfilled yearnings [Page 87].”In summary, poor farmers, wanted political rights and land. For slaves they yearned for freedom. Women wanted to have the same rights as men. Native Americans wanted the colonists to stop encroaching on their land. Many of these desires coincided while other clashed. Therein lay the chaos that drove the American Revolution. While many of the people did not succeed the ideas they fought for became deeply embedded into
“Is there a single trait of resemblance between those few towns and a great and growing people spread over a vast quarter of the globe, separated by a mighty ocean?” This question posed by Edmund Burke was in the hearts of nearly every colonist before the colonies gained their independence from Britain. The colonists’ heritage was largely British, as was their outlook on a great array of subjects; however, the position and prejudices they held concerning their independence were comprised entirely from American ingenuity. This identity crisis of these “British Americans” played an enormous role in the colonists’ battle for independence, and paved the road to revolution.
British general Thomas Gage sent 700 soldiers to guns and all the colonists’ ammunition that Concord was storing. While Thomas was at it he was going to capture Samuel Adams and John Hancock. Before the British attacked Dr. Joseph Warren learned the British’s plan to attack Concord. He sent Paul Revere, a silversmith to warn Concord. Paul promised to warn them, but he didn’t know how to go about it, so he said he would hang two lanterns if the British are coming by water and one to tell the people they’re coming by land. On the evening of April 18th, the British troops were ferried across the Boston harbor to start there March on Lexington. Paul then hung two lanterns on top of the Old North Church steeple. Samuel Adams and John Hancock put together a group of Militia called the Minutemen. They were called the Minutemen because they needed to be able to attack on a minutes notice. Sam Adams planned an escape for him and John. By the time the British got to Concord both Samuel Adams and John Hancock were gone.
What makes or breaks a drum corps? Well, there are a lot of things actually; The Cavaliers and Phantom Regiment both take different approaches to the question. The Phantom Regiment and The Cavaliers are different as The Phantom Regiment has a lighter happier compilation of show music, while The Cavaliers have a darker compilation; as well as, The Phantom Regiment prefers an organic drill with little use of props, while The Cavaliers prefer harsh lines and base their shows around props. They are also similar as they both have a similar history.
Once the British troops arrived in Concord, many militias warned minutemen, men who were ready to fight at a minute’s notice, to rush to Concord and planned a surprise attack for the British when they were going to leave. 1,400 militia and minutemen surrounded concord loaded with weapons, ready to fight, led by General Gage and Earl Percy. When the British soldiers started on the trail back, they were attacked by many men very unexpectedly. But having the British not ready to fight back they retreated very quickly not wanted to cost anymore
The Federalist and the Anti-federalist argued a lot over what should be ratified or what should be somewhere and what shouldn’t. This caused many arguments between them. It all started because of the Continental Congress trying to create a new government. This didn’t go over well with the states though because of all of the arguments over how it should be structured. So they put forward the idea of the New Jersey and Virginia plan. These Plans did not workout out for both large and small states. But one day a man named Roger Sherman created the Great Compromise which satisfied both small and big states. Another argument between the Northern and Southern states came about when the Three-Fifths compromise started. This Compromise allowed ⅗
The French and Indian war was a war between the English and the French, alongside with the Native Americans. Ever wondered how the Native Americans helped Britain and France. Also, how the Native Americans were treated by the British and French. Did you ever also wonder how the war started and/or ended? You’ll find out now.
The French and Indian War, a provincial indication of the same powers and pressures that ejected in the European Seven Years' War, was, just, a war about colonialism. The French and the English were going after area and exchanging rights in North America; these strivings brought about a lot of questioned area, especially that of the rich Ohio Valley. Every country saw this region as indispensable in its exertion to build its own particular influence and riches while at the same time restricting the quality of its adversary. Despite the fact that the war itself in this way originated from a genuinely straightforward inspiration, its results were far- arriving at. The English triumph in the war chose the frontier destiny of North America, but