Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast between my last duchess and the porphyria's lover
Explication essay on Porphyria's Lover
Compare and contrast between my last duchess and the porphyria's lover
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Love is commonly expressed through many forms of literature. Affection is compared and contrasted to many different things, in many different forms. Two pieces of literature that can be correlated to each other are Porphyria’s Lover and My Last Duchess. These two remarkable dramatic monologues portray love in a very odd way by the killing of their lovers. Each of the speakers in the stories have different motives, but ultimately executed the same deed. Porphyria’s Lover and My Last Duchess are two pieces of literature with many similarities, as well as differences.
The motives of the speaker in Porphyria’s Lover are much different than those of My Last Duchess. The man, and lover of Porphyria, opens the monologue in a dull room sitting by himself. He recognizes the weather outside as violent, which adds suspicion that something atrocious may happen. When Porphyria enters the room, she begins to add character to the scene. She starts a fire, and
…show more content…
attempts to start a conversation. The narrator gives her the silent treatment, hinting that he is upset at his companion. When the woman sits down next to him, she settles his head on her bare shoulder. At this point in the monologue, she has the upper hand in the relationship. She once again attempts to converse, but her suitor does not respond. Instead he begins to silently wrap Porphyria’s blonde hair around her own esophagus, and strangles her. The speaker suggests that she did not struggle at all, and that presents that she felt no pain. Now, after the “humane” murder was committed, the speaker begins to explain his actions. Previously in the couple’s relationship, Porphyria announced that she would be pleased to continue her happiness with her lover until the end of time. The insanity of the speaker is brought out, and he kills her so that she could be with him forever. “Porphyria’s love: she guessed not how her darling one wish could be heard. And thus we sit together now.” After this, the reader understands that the poem was written after the murder was committed, and Porphyria’s head lay on her lover's shoulder. The poem concludes after he has the high head of the relationship. The speaker in My Last Duchess has his sweetheart assassinated for a much different, and illogical sense. The Duke’s previous wife was a very beautiful human being. The Duke explains his reasoning to expose of her to an agent that represents the family of his soon to be, new wife's family. The Duke’s wealth is shown during his explanation of his old wife, and the painting that was being examined. He then continues to explain his motives of excluding his wife. “She had A heart-how shall I say?-too soon made glad, Too easily impressed; she liked whate’er She looked on.” The speaker continues to say that his ex-wife was just too joyful. The Duke suggests that she was killed for smiling too much. This is the evidence that he had his lover executed. My Last Duchess differs from Porphyria’s Lover because of the motivation behind the murder. Porphyria’s Lover and My Last Duchess also have multiple similarities.
The first, and completely obvious observation of their common characteristics is the cold, hard fact that each lover exterminated their significant other. Another affinity is the overall logic of doing so. “I gave commands; then all smiles stopped together. There she stands As if alive.” The narrator of My Last Duchess kills his lover because of her “extreme” joy. He ultimately states that she cannot be controlled, and that is why he had to assassinate her. The Duke loved her, and without being able to control her he did not want to lose her love. He executed his duchess because of her inability to be controlled or commanded. The speaker of Porphyria’s Lover is utterly insane. He strangles his suitor to fulfill a wish that she had made, but in a completely lunatic way. To allow for Porphyria to be with him for eternity, he kills her. What a looney! The logic of two murders is similar because of the fact to keep their woman controlled or for
eternity. My Last Duchess and Porphyria’s Lover are two dramatic monologues that can easily be compared and contrasted. The speaker of Porphyria’s Lover executed Porphyria to fulfill a wish that she had previously made. The Duke of My Last Duchess could not control his woman, due her happiness, so he had her executed. These two crazy lovers had motives that are somewhat similar. Each of these pieces of literature raise many questions about the insanity that comes with love. Should a man or woman drive their significant other crazy, does that show it is “true” love?
In the poem "Porphyria's Lover," the lover begins by describing the unfolding scene to an unidentified listener: "and from her form / Withdrew the dripping cloak and shawl, / And laid her soiled gloves by, untied / Her hat and let the damp hair fall" (10-13). The lover, left alone in the cottage, relates the events of the dark, stormy evening in which he anxiously waits "with heart fit to break" for his beloved Porphyria to enter. "Evidently, her absence is due to her attendance at a 'gay feast,' one of the 'vainer ties' which Porphyria presumably cultivated" (Magill 338). When she finally arrives, he tells the reader: "she sat down by my side / And called me. When no voice replied" (14-15). Porphyria speaks to him, "murmuring how she loved [him]" while the lover silently watches, becoming the mastered object to be petted and "loved." However, when he looks into her eyes, he knows that she loves him: "at last I knew / Porphyria worshipped ...
Love is heavily intertwined with being human. Indeed, everyone doubtlessly experiences some form of love in their life, be it towards objects or people. This love is organized into three types; eros, philos, and agape. Eros, likely the most common kind of love in western culture, denotes sexual desire, or lust. Philos covers love among friends, or love for the purpose to gain something. Agape, the rarest of all, encapsulates selfless love, or the willingness to die for another. All forms are present within the three works, Voltaire’s Candide, Cervantes’ Don Quixote, and in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, albeit in differing levels.
From the beginning of fiction, authors have constantly exploited the one topic that is sure to secure an audience: love. From the tragic romance of Tristan and Isolde to the satirical misadventures in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, literature seems obsessed with deciphering the mysteries of affection. The concept most debated is the question of where the line falls between lust and love and what occurs when the two are combined, and few portray it more clearly than Edmund Rostand in his French drama Cyrano de Bergerac. The influence of fickle physical attraction and deep romantic love on each other are explored by the interactions of the four main characters: De Guiche, Christian, Roxane, and Cyrano.
All three literary works seem to depict the struggle between genders. However, as Marcia Adair in The Young and the Restless pointed out that it is hard to interpret these historical love stories without looking at them through the lens of modern day perspectives. We need to take into consideration the time, culture, and society they were written in (6.12). These literary works are primarily concerned with love, courtship, affection, and desire. These themes are timeless and ever-popular because no matter which century we live in, we all have a desire to love and to be
Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, depicts an ancient feud ended by a pair of star-crossed lovers’ deaths. A lord and lady from warring families seek a forbidden love with guidance from a friar and nurse. Due to a tragic course of mischances and fateful errors, their attempt of eloping led the lovers to a tragic end. Because of rash decisions, the four characters are torn apart by miscalculating events and misunderstandings. Ultimately, the four characters encounter a heartbreaking ending, as a result of their hastiness.
In the widely acclaimed novel “Catching Fire”, the fictional character Peeta Mellark is quoted as saying, “I wish I could freeze this moment, right here, right now, and live in it forever.” (Collins). Coincidentally, that is what the unnamed lover in Robert Browning’s dramatic monologue “Porphyria’s Lover” aspires to achieve when he murders his beloved Porphyria, in hopes of preserving their intimate moment for eternity. At the start of the poem, Browning seemingly shows his audience a loving, romantic scene of Porphyria affectionately tending her inert beau. As the dramatic monologue progresses, it is learned that the originally envisioned romantic love story has transformed into a disturbing tale of a cruel lover’s massacre of his significant other. The moment the nameless speaker finally glances into his love’s eyes, he fully abandons his passive nature and reveals his true personality. The persona of Browning’s “Porphyria’s Lover” reveals himself as a sadistic and covetous lover who views Porphyria as a mere possession, and further illustrates himself as a delusional and selfish person. Browning overtly reveals the speaker’s character through proficient word choice, explicit imagery, and the clever use of irony in the poem.
In the poem Porphyria’s Lover, this desire for love is shown when Porphyria’s lover says, “Be sure I loo...
Eliza Haywood is a visionary. In her set of love letters, Love Letters on All Occasions, Haywood distinctly uses select words, such as metaphors, to subconsciously drive home the message to the reader. Whether it be re-enforcing the relationship between the two writers, or rather undercutting it, the reader understands their relationship more fully thanks to Haywood’s choice words. In Haywood’s collection Love Letters on All Occasions from her novel Fantomina and Other Works, two letters in particular, “Letter XXV” and “Letter XXVII”, Haywood’s use of metaphors and select word choices help to reinforce the sentiment between the writers to the reader.
Topic: Human nature and relationships between people –focusing on the idea of love in literary works: “Lady with the Pet Dog”, Anna Karenina, Pride and Prejudice.
In ‘My Last Duchess,’ the speaker is conveyed as being controlling, arrogant, malicious, and capricious. The Duke shows signs of jealousy and over-protection towards his first wife. On the other hand, the narrator in ‘Porphyria’s Lover’ is portrayed as who has lost touch with reality, someone clearly insane. There a few hints that this character may be lonely and withdrawn. After Porphyria enters the room he is in, the tension immediately drops and the mood warms.
A Comparison of the Dramatic Monologues of Porphyria's Lover and My Last Duchess by Robert Browning
Love has been expressed since the beginning of time; since Adam and Eve. Each culture expresses its love in its own special way. Though out history, though, it’s aspect has always been the same. Love has been a major characteristic of literature also. One of the most famous works in literary history is, Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare. This story deals with the love of a man and a woman who’s families have been sworn enemies. There love surpassed the hatred in which the families endured for generations. In the end they both ended up killing their selves, for one could not live without the other. This story is a perfect example of true love.
Robert Browning’s Porphyria’s Lover skillfully epitomizes the male desire to dominate women in all spheres of life during the Victorian Era. This power construct is foregrounded as the dominant reading through a range of literary devices in the poem, pertaining to gender roles. Originally, the dramatic monologue highlights Porphyria and her strong presence in contrast to her passive male lover.
The Victorian period was in 1830-1901, this period was named after Queen Victoria; England’s longest reigning monarch. Britain was the most powerful nation in the world. This period was known for a rather stern morality. A huge changed happened in England; factories were polluting the air, cities were bursting at the seams, feminism was shaking up society, and Darwin’s theory of evolution was assaulting long established religious beliefs. The Victorians were proud of their accomplishments and optimistic about the future, but psychologically there was tension, doubt, and anxiety as people struggled to understand and deal with the great changes they were experiencing. One of the authors known for writing during the Victorian Period was Robert Browning. Robert Browning was a poet and playwright whose mastery of dramatic monologues, which made him one of the Victorian poets. Robert died in December 1889. His Poem “Porphyria’s Lover” was published in 1836. This essay will explore three elements of Victorianism in Porphyria’s Lover by Robert Brown...
"Porphyria's Lover" is an exhilarating love story given from a lunatic's point of view. It is the story of a man who is so obsessed with Porphyria that he decides to keep her for himself. The only way he feels he can keep her, though, is by killing her. Robert Browning's poem depicts the separation of social classes and describes the "triumph" of one man over an unjust society. As is often the case in fiction, the speaker of "Porphyria's Lover" does not give accurate information in the story.