Compare And Contrast Poe And The Cask Of Amontillado

901 Words2 Pages

The dark side of humans is revealed in both Poe and Oates stories as their characters move from an unrealistic view of their lives to a more realistic view. Dark Romanticism was a nineteenth century response to the Transcendentalist movement where Dark Romantic writers such as Poe and Hawthorne focused on the human nature predisposition to move towards sin and self destruction. The plots of Joyce Carol Oates’s “Where are you going, Where have you been?” and Poe's “The Cask of Amontillado” progress through the depiction of the aspects of Dark Romanticism and the power of human nature's dark side. In Oates’ story, Connie is a vain fifteen year old girl living in a fanciful world in attempts to break away from the struggles of adolescence she …show more content…

These quixotic ideals and expectations of Connie are what put her in a vulnerable position due to the unrealistic world of love and boys she lives in. Her adult like persona and constant need for validation from others of her beauty is what leads Connie’s “two sided” self to be disconnected from the harsh realities that come alongside being an adult. Connie is forced to face this harrowing reality when the malignant antagonist, Arnold Friend, decides to show up to her house one day while her family is away at a barbecue. Arnold is almost the personification of the Devil as he lures himself into a conversation with Connie through deceit and manipulation. At first Connie “couldn't decided if she liked him or if he was just a jerk,” this statement portrays her naivety and the imaginary world she lives in as she tries to flaunt her amorous attitude in attempts of playing hard to get with a complete stranger. To achieve his sinful desire to hurt Connie, Arnold disingenuously dresses younger than his age, stuffs his shoes to appear taller and manipulatively fakes sharing the same interest in music as Connie to achieve a false sense of comfort and intimacy with her. Connie is abruptly thrown into the reality of …show more content…

The irrational protagonist, Montresor, has vowed revenge upon his enemy Fortunato who has supposedly inflicted “thousand injuries” and “ventured upon insult” towards the narrator over the past years. The lack of details and vagueness in the beginning of the story is representative of the unrealistic view the narrator views his life in. In attempts to go through with his baleful plan of murdering Fortunato, Montresor “accidentally” comes across him at a carnival and lures him away with the promise of a divine wine known as “Amontillado.” As Fortunato mindlessly pursues his weakness and greed, he is thrown into a position of vulnerability that eventually leads to his demise. This succumbing to desire due to his pride on his “connoisseurship in wine” depicts an innate weakness of human nature to pursue his/her own selfish gain and interest without thinking of the consequences. This same greed and thought of Amontillado portrays both characters unrealistic and selfish perspective on life which Fortunato will ending up paying a hefty price for. Montresor's iniquitous motives and consummation by the thought of retribution is what leads him to follow his dark motives to manipulate and prey on Fortunato's

Open Document