Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on dark romanticism
Contradictions of dark romanticism
Essay on dark romanticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The dark side of humans is revealed in both Poe and Oates stories as their characters move from an unrealistic view of their lives to a more realistic view. Dark Romanticism was a nineteenth century response to the Transcendentalist movement where Dark Romantic writers such as Poe and Hawthorne focused on the human nature predisposition to move towards sin and self destruction. The plots of Joyce Carol Oates’s “Where are you going, Where have you been?” and Poe's “The Cask of Amontillado” progress through the depiction of the aspects of Dark Romanticism and the power of human nature's dark side. In Oates’ story, Connie is a vain fifteen year old girl living in a fanciful world in attempts to break away from the struggles of adolescence she …show more content…
faces at home with her family. Her lack of identity and self is what leads her to feed off of the attention she receives from older men as a result of her desirability and sex appeal.
These quixotic ideals and expectations of Connie are what put her in a vulnerable position due to the unrealistic world of love and boys she lives in. Her adult like persona and constant need for validation from others of her beauty is what leads Connie’s “two sided” self to be disconnected from the harsh realities that come alongside being an adult. Connie is forced to face this harrowing reality when the malignant antagonist, Arnold Friend, decides to show up to her house one day while her family is away at a barbecue. Arnold is almost the personification of the Devil as he lures himself into a conversation with Connie through deceit and manipulation. At first Connie “couldn't decided if she liked him or if he was just a jerk,” this statement portrays her naivety and the imaginary world she lives in as she tries to flaunt her amorous attitude in attempts of playing hard to get with a complete stranger. To achieve his sinful desire to hurt Connie, Arnold disingenuously dresses younger than his age, stuffs his shoes to appear taller and manipulatively fakes sharing the same interest in music as Connie to achieve a false sense of comfort and intimacy with her. Connie is abruptly thrown into the reality of …show more content…
the situation as it dawns upon her that “he wasn't a kid, he was much older,” , Oates uses imagery to describe Connie's overwhelmed stream of consciousness as she comes face to face with evil in the form of Arnold. As Arnold threatens and forces Connie to come with him , she “cried for her mother,” which is symbolic that regardless of how Connie tries to act like an adult, in reality she is inexperienced and gullible, traits that lead her towards her own demise. In effect, Connie transitions from viewing Arnold in a falsely imagined light for the realistic personification of evil that he truly is. Edgar Allan Poe's, “ The Cask of Amontillado,” successfully illustrates the self-destruction of the antagonist by following the protagonist as he exploits the weak self-control of his nemesis and abruptly forces him into the sinful reality of his situation and eventual demise.
The irrational protagonist, Montresor, has vowed revenge upon his enemy Fortunato who has supposedly inflicted “thousand injuries” and “ventured upon insult” towards the narrator over the past years. The lack of details and vagueness in the beginning of the story is representative of the unrealistic view the narrator views his life in. In attempts to go through with his baleful plan of murdering Fortunato, Montresor “accidentally” comes across him at a carnival and lures him away with the promise of a divine wine known as “Amontillado.” As Fortunato mindlessly pursues his weakness and greed, he is thrown into a position of vulnerability that eventually leads to his demise. This succumbing to desire due to his pride on his “connoisseurship in wine” depicts an innate weakness of human nature to pursue his/her own selfish gain and interest without thinking of the consequences. This same greed and thought of Amontillado portrays both characters unrealistic and selfish perspective on life which Fortunato will ending up paying a hefty price for. Montresor's iniquitous motives and consummation by the thought of retribution is what leads him to follow his dark motives to manipulate and prey on Fortunato's
vulnerability for his own personal gain. In an intentional approach to exploit Fortunato's ego by making him feel weak through suggesting to “go back” , Montresor depicts the manipulative side of humans and how in Realism, man is evil and has a destructively selfish dark side. Fortunato's expectations and desire lead him down a path of being subjected to horrific evil, throwing him down a sudden shock from horrific reality. In both short stories, the characters are blinded from reality due to their individual character flaws and desires, leading them to be fatally taken aback when faced with the brutal reality of the evil in the human world. In Connie's case, her naivety lead her to be preyed on by a perverse, sinful man who forcefully lures her away into death and destruction. The same applies to Fortunato, as his greed for wine in his inebriated state blinds his sense of danger allowing Montresor to exact revenge by harnessing his gullibility and eventually murdering him. This brutally honest and realistic reflection of human nature portrays the power of a dark side and the pitfall of vulnerability.
Arnold Friend takes advantage of Connie’s teenage innocence for something of a much more sinister purpose. Connie thought she had it all figured out until Arnold Friend came into her life and up her driveway on one summer, Sunday afternoon and made her realize how big and scary the world can be. Arnold embodies everything that Connie has dreamed about in a boy, but is in the most malevolent form of Connie’s dream boy. She always wanted to get away from her family because she has always felt as if she didn’t belong and Arnold can make this possible just in the most predatory way. She always thought sex would be sweet (and consensual) and that she would be in charge of how it progressed, Arnold strips her of the authority she’s held in any other encounter with a boy. The moral of the story is always be careful what you wish
Connie has the need to be viewed as older and as more mature than she really is, all the while still displaying childlike behavior. She shows this childlike behavior by “craning her neck to glance in mirrors [and] checking other people’s faces to make sure her own was all right” (Oates 323). This shows that Connie is very insecure and needs other people’s approval. Although on one side she is very childish, on the other side she has a strong desire to be treated like an adult. This longing for adulthood is part of her coming of age, and is demonstrated by her going out to “bright-lit, fly-infested restaurant[s]” and meeting boys, staying out with those boys for three hours at a time, and lying to her parents about where she has been and who she has been with (Oates 325, 326). “Everything about her ha[s] two sides to it, one for home and one for anywhere that was not home” (Oates 324). Even her physical movements represent her two-sided nature: “her walk that could be childlike and bobbing, or languid enough to make anyone think she was hearin...
In the story, Oates presents the main character, Connie, as a somewhat bratty teenager that does not have a close relationship with her mother or sister. Her mother shows envy towards her daughter making comments to her such as, “ Stop gawking at
Through Arnold Friend, Connie learns that her rush to grow up is foolish and that she is trying to jump into a world that she knows nothing about and that could be potentially dangerous. She ultimately releases her dream and clings to her family as never before, realizing that their firm grasp on her is not for their benefit, but her own. Joyce Carol Oates?s vivid description of Arnold Friend carries the most emotional freight, as the evil behind his apparent glamor brings about Connie?s change. Though he takes the outer appearance of a normal boy, everything about his behavior suggests that he is the Devil himself in disguise.
Arnold Friend’s layers of deception. Connie’s blindness is the pretext of her loss of innocence
Joyce Carol Oates uses the description of the characters to reveal their purpose in the story and their affect on others. June portrays the family environment Connie lives in and the differences between her and Connie. This leads to Connie’s need for attention from others and acknowledgement of her beauty. She desires attention and to be an adult, but she is stuck in between childhood and adulthood with her daydreams about fanciful romance supplied by music. Arnold Friend causes Connie to confront reality and her struggle between childhood and adulthood. Oates is able to portray Connie’s move from childhood and fantasy to reality and adulthood through her willingly leaving with Arnold Friend – sacrificing herself for her family.
In her article, Renee utters that when the thought of vengeance build up in an individual’s brain, it coerces him insane and does not tolerate him to present it a second thought. The first sentence of the story, “The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge,” clearly describes the whole theme of the story as a deeply enrooted revenge in Montresor’s mind” which is an absolute portrayal of retribution that occurs due to arrogance and jealousy. Author sees himself as a superior individual and was victimized by a superiority complex which is quite visible through the phrases which he wrote in the story that Montressor expresses superiority as showed his victim as a foolish person by attributing weird physical appearance and dress appearance in which he described his dress code of “tight fitting parti striped dress and head was surmounted by the conical cap and bells.”
1. What can the reader infer about Montresor’s social position and character from hints in the text? What evidence does the text provide that Montresor is an unreliable narrator? We learned from paragraph 23 to 24 that Montresor owns a Palazzo and also has lot of retainers based on that evidence, the reader can infer that Montresor is a very wealthy and successful man. About his character, the reader can imply that Montresor is a heartless, cold blooded, sneaky, manipulative, and untrustworthy man, as well as a man who hold on to grudges. Moreover, Montresor is an unreliable narrator, because he reveals in the first paragraph that he intends to have a revenge on Fortunato, but he did not indicate or clearly prove to the readers how Fortunato
Oates takes us to a journey of rebellion as the protagonist sorts through self-created illusion in order to come to terms with her own sexual inexperience. Connie’s desires for attention from the opposite sex, her vanity and immaturity blind her to think of the real intentions of guys, in this case Arnold Friend. A character that many critics argue is real, yet, others argue it was created by Connie’s mind.
When approached by Arnold Friend at first, she was skeptical but was still charmed by him. As she began to feel uneasy, Connie could have used her intuition to realize that he was trouble. Once she had been engaged by Arnold, her life was over. The influences on Connie and her lack of instilled reasoning led to her down fall. Her family’s fragmented nature was echoed in her actions; consequently, she was unable to communicate with her parents, and she was never was able to learn anything of significance. She felt abandoned and rejected, because no one took the initiative to teach her how to make good decisions. Connie was unable to mature until she was faced with death and self sacrifice. In the end, her situation made it difficult for her to think and reason beyond the position she was in. By not being able apply insight, she fell into Arnold Friends lure. Misguidance by the parents strongly contributed to Connie’s
Connie’s clothes and infatuation with her own beauty symbolize her lack of maturity or knowing her true self, which in the end enables her to be manipulated by Arnold Friend. Connie was enamored with her own beauty; in the beginning of the story Oates states that Connie “knew
In Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Cask of Amontillado,” Montresor sets out on a vengeful mission that will end Fortunato’s life in an untimely fate. Montresor appeals to Fortunato’s love for wine to tempt the unsuspecting fellow to his impending doom. While Montresor tricks the foolish Fortunato frightfully, it is ultimately Fortunato’s pride that leads to his demise in the crypt. Poe uses several literary devices to foreshadow this murderous exploit of Montresor. Through the use of irony, symbolism, and imagery, the story entices readers to delve into the relationships and differences between Montresor and Fortunato.
As the story begins, Fortunato believes he and Montresor are friends or at the very least friendly. However, Montresor is secretly plotting Fortunato’s murder. Montresor believes that Fortunato has given a “thousand injuries” and it is not until he “insults” Montresor that Montresor springs into action. Unfortunately, it is never explained if these injuries and insults really happened or if they are a delusion. Montresor makes an unreliable narrator and one gets the feeling he suffers from a psychological disorder, such as delusional paranoid personality disorder. This disorder causes the victim to become obsessed with a delusion “involving a phenomenon that the person’s culture could conceivably regard as plausible.” They often believe “they have been injured by friends or strangers, and they tend to see other persons as enemies.” Montresor gives the impression he and Fortunato have known each other for an extended amount of time. Montresor knows more about Fortunato than Fortunato knows about Montresor; possibly because Fortunato is constantly drunk.
Rubin attempts to convey the idea that Connie falls asleep in the sun and has a daydream in which her “…intense desire for total sexual experience runs headlong into her innate fear…” (58); and aspects of the story do seem dream like - for instance the way in which the boys in Connie’s daydreams “…dissolved into a single face…” (210), but the supposition that the entire episode is a dream does not ring true. There are many instances in which Connie perceives the frightening truth quite clearly; she is able to identify the many separate elements of Friend’s persona - “… that slippery friendly smile of his… [and] the singsong way he talked…” (214). But because of the lack of attachment with her own family, and her limited experience in relating deeply to others, “…all of these things did not come together” (214) and Connie is unable to recognize the real danger that Arnold Friend poses until it is too late.
When Arnold and Connie’s eyes meet inadvertently, Connie sees “a boy with shaggy black hair, in a convertible jalopy painted gold” (Oates 371). To Connie, this was by pure chance and a pure stranger. To Arnold, Connie is his next victim. On the very next day, Arnold shows up at Connie’s house while her parents and sister are away at a family barbeque. Arnold entices her to go for a ride in his car by the use of appealing music and smooth conversation. However, taking an innocent girl for a ride in his car was the last of his intentions. Because of Connie’s lack of experience, curiosity, and inability to withstand peer pressure she succumbs to Arnold’s predatory hands. On that dreadful day, Connie lost her innocence and her