Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The chaser by john collier literary device
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The chaser by john collier literary device
Characters in stories can be very similar and very different. The characters from the book, 50 Great Short Stories, Midge and Alan are both very alike. Midge, one of the main characters in the short story, “A Standard of Living” by Dorothy Parker, and Alan, one of the main characters in “The Chaser” by John Collier, are similar in how they are greedy, selfish, and they both focus on materialistic things. Both main characters, Midge and Alan are greedy. Midge is greedy for class, money and status, whereas Alan is greedy for love. Midge and her friend, Annabel, invented a game. This game is a game where they could buy anything they want at any price. The narrator explains the game that Midge had devised, “rather she had evolved it from an old one. Basically, it was no more than the ancient sport of what-would-you-do-if-you-had-a-million-dollars?” (28). Annabel and Midge are greedy for money, class, and things, so this is why they play the game. They devote their life to the game and worship it, even though everything is fake and imaginary. Alan is greedy as well. Alan Is greedy for love from Diana. Diana is the girl of his dreams. The old man is …show more content…
giving Alan a potion that will make Diana fall in love with him. He is only focused on her love though and not the consequences of the potion. Alan says to old man who is explaining how the potion works, “‘Wonderful!’…’That is love!”’ (559). He is so greedy and will do anything for her love. Both Characters are greedy in different ways. Secondly, Both characters are selfish. They both think only of themselves and not the people they are affecting. When Midge and Annabel were playing their game, Annabel said she would buy a silver fox coat. Midge went ballistic and shunned Annabel for it, “ When Midge recovered her breath she cried that she couldn't imagine how Annabel could do such a thing-silver fox coats are so common!” (30). Midge ignored her best friend because she did not like her opinion or decision in what Annabel wanted to do with “her” money. She is so selfish and self-centered, and she does not realize that this could have hurt Annabel. Alan is also selfish as well. Alan does not understand that when giving Diana the love potion, she will change completely. The old man is explaining how the love potion works and the consequences, but Alan is overlooking them. For example, the old man says “ Their effects are permanent…She will change altogether” (558-559). Alan is only thinking of himself when listening to the old man, and thinking of giving Diana the potion. He does not realize that she will not be with the person he fell in love with, only her body and not her soul. Midge and Alan are both very selfish and egocentric. Lastly, both characters focus on materials things.
When Midge plays the game with her friend they focus on the things they can buy and the things it will give them like class and status, and “They painted their lips and their nails…they wore thin bright dresses tight over their breasts and high on their legs, and tilted slippers, fancifully strapped. They looked conspicuous and cheap and charming (28). They focus on the attention of others and the things they can buy. Lastly, Alan focuses on materialism too. He focuses on Diana. After the old man gives him the potion he is so excited to use it on her, “‘ I can’t tell you how grateful I am’ said Alan’’’ (560). He is focused on her and her body, a materialistic object, and not her genuine happiness and love. Materialism was the main focus for both Alan and
Midge. Midge was greedy for objects and money, and Alan was greedy for love from Diana. Midge and Alan were also selfish because they only focused on themselves and not the people around them or the people they were affecting. Lastly, both were shallow and focused on materialistic things, like status and love. The two characters were from two different shot stories but were very similar.
As the reader follows the novel and reads deeper into the book, they find that the conflict is person vs. person, or the game itself, with the heirs trying to win the game. In the beginning, the heirs of Sam Westing started playing the Westing Game, and all the players, or heirs, got paired up with their partners that they would have for the rest of the game (38). With Turtle as the protagonist, she has the same predicament as all
Compare two characters – one from each work – who are similar in temperament or who seem to be in analogous situations.
have a different story behind them but share similarities, such as them being authors, the
The characters and society are similar even if the novels have a completely different story. They
... almost nothing alike from a superficial aspect. The stories have different historical contexts and they simply don’t have much in common to the average audience. It is easy to contrast the stories, but deep within certain elements, the stories can be linked in several ways.
The similarities are prolific in their presence in certain parts of the novel, the very context of both stories shows similarities, both are dealing with an oppressed factor that is set free by an outsider who teaches and challenges the system in which the oppressed are caught.
Firstly, the authors use the use of protagonists to show how they can present similar ideas in different ways. The two protagonists which the authors present are Keating from Dead Poets Society and McMurphy from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s nest. These characters have readers intrigued and on their feet from the beginning. These characters always keep the readers guessing what they’re going to do next for example when Keating says “No matter what anybody tells you, words and ideas can change the world.” The Protagonists are presented as very different people but are in reality extremely similar and serve the same purpose. The authors present them as
In the beginning of the novel, the main character, Georgie, is introduced along with his aunt, Miss Frobisher. The two of them live in wealth and prosper in the game of croquet. Georgie and his aunt spend a great amount of spare
In Fahrenheit 451 and Lord of the Flies, the characters are alike in some ways. In Fahrenheit 451 the characters are Montag, Faber, Clarisse, and Beatty. In Lord of the Flies the characters are Ralph, Piggy, Simon and Jack. Jack and Beatty, Ralph and Montag, Simon and Clarisse, and Piggy and Faber all have some similarities. Jack and beatty both want to take control over everyone and sells fear. Ralph and Montag want to move on and find a better plan to make everything work. Simon and Clarisse are Christ-figures. Piggy and Faber are very intellectual and are wise men. The books may contain different story lines but have very similar types of characters.
When comparing the characters in the book to real people, it is not hard to see the similarities.
For example Kate and Kat were similar as their both independent and intelligent individuals who go by their own morals and don't care what anyone else thinks of them. Bianca in both texts is seen as the object of desire' as of her submissive manner and good looks. I used similarities like these ones all throughout 10 things' with only making minor changes.
All of the inhabitants of East and West Egg use one another to get what they want, with little care as to how it will affect the people around them. Through the eyes of Nick Carraway, we see how the wealthy live: they live in a luxurious society surrounded by their own lies and deception. Looking in from the outside, their lives seem perfect; they have everything that money can buy, right? Wrong, the one thing that their money cannot buy them is happiness, and this is why each character deceives someone.
The first guest that the reader is introduced to in the story is Mr. Medbourne, who was known for his tendency to devise money making schemes. He proved himself to be the most prominent example of greed in the story. Greed, also known as avarice, is an intense selfish desire for something such as material wealth or gain. At the beginning of the short story, it was said, “Mr. Medbourne, in the vigor of his age, had been a prosperous merchant, but had lost his all by a frantic speculation, and was now little better than a mendicant.” (Dr. Heidegger 502). In other words, Mr. Medbourne had been his own demise and was now of little social stature as a beggar. Despite knowing this, when given the chance to return to his youth he goes straight back to scheming.
Funerals, the place where people go for money and free food. The Westing Game by Ellen Raski is a story of a mysterious man (Sam Westing) who is murdered and leaves a fortune to one of twelve heirs. They have 10,000 dollars to find out who killed Sam and the desire for the money. They all were put into groups of two and were given clues to find his murder. The whole concept of money blinds the heirs from what is actually happening in the real world. In the Westing Game, Ellen Raski uses money to act as a power to show how strong the value of emotional power is and how we get caught up in artificial power searching for emotional power.
Things that are similar about the two novels and how both of their dreams were crushed are both are groups of people who have these dreams and each finds or meets something that can help their dreams come true, the pearl and Candy. Furthermore, the realization of their dreams coming to an end is, in both books, caused by the death of someone who is a part of the dream, Coyotito and Lennie.