Compare And Contrast Japanese And Internment Camps

741 Words2 Pages

The Japanese attack against the United States in Pearl Harbor happened so quickly that most Americans were captured in the opening weeks of World War II. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941, President Roosevelt signed the Executive Order 9066. This order authorized the evacuation of all Japanese Americans on the west coast to be placed into relocation centers. After this, over 120,000 Japanese Americans were taken out of their homes, piled into buses and cars, and forced into internment camps. With ten camps in all, they were located in California, Arizona, Colorado, Wyoming, Idaho, Utah, and Arkansas. It is recognized, then, by all that even wars must have limits. The limits that must be applied are essentially in the Geneva Conventions plus other treaties of international humanitarian law. All the countries participation in WWII accepted these terms, however Japan failed to follow through and ignored the laws. The Japanese captured thousands of American soldiers and held them in Japanese camps. The Japanese held prisoners of war in horrible camps throughout Japan, forced them to work in horrendous conditions, and treated them inhumanely. The living For one, they were both relocation centers for groups of people during WWII. Also, campers were in unsanitary and overcrowded conditions where they were being mistreated for beliefs of nationality. However, the camps in Japan were much more brutal than the Internment camps in the US. In the Japanese relocation camps prisoners were not there for final execution like Americans seemed to be in the pacific. Nearly half were forced to work as slave laborers, and about forty percent of American POWs died in Japanese captivity. In America, after the war was over compensations were made to Japanese Americans and government officials apologized for what they put them through; however, no apologies or compensations were made to

Open Document